Jump to content

Juani2400

Members
  • Content Count

    276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Juani2400

  1. I am also interested in learning the ropes of DM coding, so sign me up.
  2. This appeal has been denied as per the reasons stated above.
  3. Hello. You were spoken to or punished about the reason of your final ban 9 times before it happened. You evaded, in fact, a permanent ban on your previous account, which is what lead to this accumulation of notes and various punishments. You bypassed the system and kept doing the same with the newer account, which made you end up here. What makes you deserve a tenth (tenth!) chance at it? You were already explained how what you were doing was completely against our rules, and our staff was already pretty lenient with not perma-banning you earlier. I am not completely closed to unbanning you under severely strict conditions, but I will need some time to discuss this with some people first. I will be back at some point this week.
  4. Trial will be granted. It will start today 07/MAR/2020, and will end in a week, on the 14/MAR/2020, inclusive. Good luck!
  5. Hello. I will be handling this application. Please continue to gather feedback. You can expect a review of this application through the next week, before weekend. Cheers.
  6. Alright, then the trial will be extended for 72 more hours, starting now, until wednesday, 4th of March.
  7. Reporting Personnel: Kilqrr'Quraqk Xiiqrxum. Job Title of Reporting Personnel: Head of Security. Game ID: b5W-dgbl Personnel Involved: - Holiday Lynn (visitor), offender. - Riori'Uptari Nunuz, (captain), witness. - Quintin Copperfield (visitor), witness. Secondary Witnesses: (Name, Job Title: Short description of what they witnessed) - Katherine Linenbord, Security Officer: potentially was aware of Mrs. Lynn's takeover. Was not present for the slander. Time of Incident: ~12:00-13:30 aprox. Real Time: 00:00 UTC, 01/MAR/2020 aprox. Location of Incident: Non-relevant. Nature of Incident: [ ] - Workplace Hazard [ ] - Accident/Injury [ ] - Destruction of Property [ ] - Neglect of Duty [ ] - Harassment [ ] - Assault [ ] - Misconduct [X] - Other: Regulations breach Overview of the Incident: As you may be aware, such shift was a problematic one given the arrival of a ship from the People's Republic of Adhomai full of hostile robots. Hostilities among the crew arose, and by the end of the shift, our Captain was physically incapacitated. They were still concious. It was at this moment when, Mrs. Lynn, who had been with the Captain as a visitor at all times during the shift, decided to take justice by their own hand and take over the Captain position. Mrs. Lynn is hired in the position of Captain for the NSS Aurora, but this time they were just visiting. They did not seek the approval or even mentioned the take-over to the Captain or the rest of Command. They acquired Captain-level items (including, but not limited to: Captain headset, Captain-level ID card), and started to exercise their authority over the rest of Command staff and crew, including over myself. They fully expected to be complied with their orders, and did not think twice of insulting my management of the situation after being in the position for less than twenty minutes, suffering from asymmetrical information and lack of situational awareness herself, due to not being kept in the loop with the previous events or the on-going tasks and orders of the Security team. They did so in the open, with several other visitors who she invited into the shuttle's cockpit, among them, Quintin Copperfield, and at least one more whom I can't get the name of. I felt slandered at the time, unable to defend myself over the very resounding arguments and attitude she was having. You must know, it is strictly prohibited, under company policy, to be assigned a position if the subject's status on-board is nothing but a visitor. Only the Captain, under extreme circumstances, is allowed to circumvent station's policy in this regard, and they did not do such. Even more, when they took over without authorization or approval from anyone in the Command team, they did so with their implant off, which could have resulted in catastrophe would they have been in the position for longer, as they may have incurred in wrong decisions against the interests of the Corporation. Charges of Mutiny, Grand Theft and Slander on a Head of Staff may apply. Submitted Evidence: No physical evidence is available. Did you report it to a Head of Staff or a superior? If so, who? If not, why?: It was not reported to a superior due to lack of time. Actions taken: None. Additional Notes: Please consider that Quintin Copperfield's statement may be biased due to openly siding with the offender at the time. I have no more names of the staff present during the slander situation. As for the acting captaincy, several other crew members are surely aware of this happening, but I do not have any concise names to give.
  8. Hello. Since you are arguing a decision on the highest level of the hierarchy, that has not only been reviewed already a few times, but has also involved discussions in the administration team as a whole, we will not be reviewing this complaint. The ban will be kept in place indefinitely. Following discussions made some weeks ago, the ability to make appeals and complaints by proxy will be removed. Community-bans are already discussed widely among the modmin team and we feel that this process is enough to guarantee the fairness of the procedure since consensus needs to be reached. Closing and archiving this complaint.
  9. Hello. First of all, apologies for the slight delay in handling this. I have been reviewing the rounds you've been playing, and it looks like the feedback just stops after a certain date, but you've kept playing the character and the role after that time. Not only that, but you have also played the Chief Engineer role with a different character than the one in the application. Is there any reason for that happening? You are expected to play a consistent Command character through the trial, in order to aid the feedback gathering process. I have no particular issues with the feedback given; it is mostly positive, but since it's a bit vague, I'd have loved to see a bit more of it. I'm considering extending this trial for a bit longer to see if you can gather a bit more of feedback. Would this be convenient for you? Cheers!
  10. Feedback is quite positive and uniform, and I have also personally seen you play and interacted with your Consular. Trial passed.
  11. @Boggle08 @Lemei @Screemers @Skyflieger It still exists, but it is not very active. It's still reccommended for every whitelistee to have access to it, since CCIA sometimes post stuff in there. Please PM me via Discord or forums your whitelist application from the archive and your forum name if interested, and I will get you sorted in no time.
  12. I'm content with the new answer, and the grammar and format have improved significantly. I'll be granting you a trial that will start tomorrow 18/FEB/2020 and will finish on the 25/FEB/2020, inclusive. Please remember that you'll need to continue to advertise your application (preferably after each round of Command played) so the people who have interacted with you can leave feedback. If not enough satisfactory feedback is gathered, there's a risk of the application being denied at the end of the trial. Also, please, try to maintain the effort toward grammar correctness. No point in fixing it in the app if no result is seen in-game, which is where it really matters. Good luck!
  13. As per recent events, this complaint will be locked and archived. This will be reviewed privately, still.
  14. Alright! Your trial will be starting tomorrow, 17/FEB/2020 and will be active until Monday, 24/FEB/2020 inclusive. I expect to activate your whitelist by the late European afternoon/evening, so don't expect it too soon in the day. Remember that you'll need to continue to advertise your application (preferably after each round of Command played) so the people who have interacted with you can leave feedback. If not enough satisfactory feedback is gathered, there's a risk of the application being denied at the end of the trial. If you are unable to be active during the period, we can cancel the trial and reschedule at another time, if needed. Contact me if that's the case. Good luck!
  15. Hello! I'm not particularly familiar with any of your characters specially (besides one of the vaurca), but I am confident your ability to RP is on-par with what is required from you, as that is what I am hearing from these people. In any case, since your Ta has not lived in Tau Ceti and it has not directly affected them yet, how about you tell me about what they can expect as a Vaurcan Ta in the system? How do you think this experience will impact them? Do you think they will feel similarly treated as the rest of Vaurca, or will get treated in a different way due to their position? Please include your availability for a trial in your response, since you've told me you are not available at certain times of the week. It will last for a week, and we can start it at anytime it feels right for you, if the answer to the questions above is satisfactory.
  16. Hello. First of all, sorry for the delay, since I've been unable to work on this earlier. Getting to the point, I have no issues with what I know about your RP, but I do have certain issues in regards to your application, and thus I would like you to ammend them before continuing: Format. The format is a bit fucked up, specially in the initial part of the application. No biggie, but given that we are going for a set of corrections, I'd prefer if you repaired it. Grammar and capitalization. This one is particularly important since you are going for a Command position. The ability of the player to type correctly and to capitalize letters as required is pretty important, in my opinion. No one likes a head of staff who can't type correctly, they simply don't inspire trust or seem rather new. Consider that all we see from a player in-game is the text they write, so I think it is an important point to take care of. I don't know if you are a native speaker or not, but I'd rather have you work a bit on this aspect and ensure you can transmit IG what a whitelisted player is supposed to. Just fix your application and make the effort to maintain the level if your trial is given. Answers. All the answers are pretty okay and you answer what you're expected to. However, I would like you to clarify a bit on "Could you give us the gist of what is currently happening in Tau ceti and how it affected your character and their career?" question. The second paragraph is a bit confusing, and I don't know how it gets to affect the character entirely. Try rewording it a bit to see if you can project your initial idea a bit better. I'm available in Discord for any specific questions you may have about what I asked here. Please post on this thread once the editing has been conducted. Again, sorry for the time this took. I will get back to you soon. Cheers.
  17. Hello. I will be handling this application. Please ensure you gather enough feedback before I review this application, which should happen over this weekend, hopefully.
  18. Hello. I will be handling this application. Please ensure you gather enough feedback before I review this application, which should happen over this weekend, hopefully.
  19. This seems like non-issue, probably coming from isolated situations. When a ticket is closed without any answer is normally because: 1) We are bulk-closing a bunch of them. Normally we'll contact you if the ticket is relatively recent or there was a resolution pending (in the latter case, normally we just go by 'handled' or similar), otherwise it is pointless to ask if anything else is needed for a ticket that was taken 20 minutes ago. 2) You were not an involved party in a process, and just a witness. This sometimes happens when we are wrapping up a situation and we simply asked you what you saw, or whatever. Sometimes we'll just forget thank you for the help and just close the ticket together with the rest of the open tickets of the situation. 3) The most common one: we forget or don't notice. Normally we'll wait a bit or be clear that we are concluding the ticket ('thanks for your time','have a nice round') and wait for a response, but mods and admins are humans too and we are not always on the same mood, or always remember to do it. Sometimes we have limited time, as well, due to external circumstances. If you feel you have something more to add, or want to express your gratitude, or whatever, you can always create a new ticket or just say 'thanks X' over OOC. We will not punish you for it unless you are just arguing for the sake for arguing after being told something was over. I do understand having to retype the whole thing is a pain, but unfortunately that's how the mechanic works. We try to remember to give enough time, but it is not always possible due to everything I said above. I'll be voting for the dismissal of this proposal, since it has no possible implementation from the policy side, and is also unneeded.
  20. This is really not the place to argue this matter, as neither I or the admin subject of the complaint have any relation whatsoever with the thread or the handling staff. You are free to talk about this with the headmins for a solution, or with the handling staff (which are Abo and Cnaym).
  21. Sorry, I was referring to the ban request that was recently archived. Staff is still working on it despite the OP requesting its withdrawal, as several other people raised various points. Since it may affect how this complaint is handled, we will wait until it's been resolved and then start the process with this one.
×
×
  • Create New...