ReadThisNamePlz

Okay. I will unban you when I am home tonight.

I'm still waiting for more feedback before I decide on a trial or not @Skyflieger

I actually need to rewrite what I put, so it doesn't seem like I jusst threw my colleagues under the bus. I did hype the vote up, in hindsight. Although unintentionally at the time, I see how it could have been perceived as Hype. I however, did not really mean I was going to make a second vote. I was completely okay with it, though. I did call for one. Though when I did, I was trying to be joking with it, though I did not have an issue with the idea, at all. I was okay with the idea because of the fact that most players were not aware of the changes, and a few wanted a revote.

No, not really, but, okay. If you haven't noticed yet, I am a very vocal person in OOC, about literally anything. "Hyping" it up, was not something I did. Atleast, it was not my intention. Regardless, I have nothing else to say here.

I didn't make the new vote, I simply made the mechanics change known. I joked about making a new vote, but ultimately did not. I am not sure why I am in this.

Hi, I am the person who will be handling your application. Please give me an additional 24 hours to decide on a trial for you. While you wait, please advertise your app and seek feedback.

Trial accepted

It's not hard written, but I discussed it with the other admins in our chat. I'll see if we can get something made to specify this policy clearly to the playerbase. Regarding your question on the RD suggestion, I said to rework the character, you can easily change them up to have had a history with NT, make them older, etc. Or, just pick one of the two jobs and scrap the qualifications of the other job. It's your character, you are free to do what you will. As long as it obeys the rules and policies we have, of course.

Right, hello. I'll be posting my ruling now. @ShesTrying was enforcing a policy that we have in place, to prevent power-gaming. Having a character, that can work as a roboticist and a scientist, just isn't acceptable OOCly. It opens up too many doorways for possible power-gaming. While you presented many good points and have clearly thought this character out, icly. OOCly, we just don't allow it. @Aboshedab put it into words, better than I ever could. While yes, it is possible, it just isn't believable here. Why would NanoTrasen hire you as a Scientist/Roboticist? Why not just make you an RD? Regarding the part about the conversation being ended abruptly, an Adminhelp (ticket) is not meant for conversations, or arguments. Overall. We're going to continue following our policy. You will need to rework your character, and pick one of the two jobs, or just make them a Research Director, via command whitelist application. I am going to leave this open for the next twentyfour hours, but my mind is not going to change on this. Enjoy your day! ^-^

I'm waiting for a response from @ShesTrying before I do anything.

Hi, I will be handling this complaint.

I will be granting you a command whitelist trial, during this trial, be active, gather feedback, and do your very best to play command throughout the week. Trial begins [OCT/17/19] Trial will end [OCT/24/19] Enjoy!

Hello, I will be overseeing your application, I will come back within 48 - 72 hours with an answer on whether I will grant you a trial or not. In the meantime, continue to gather feedback.

Hello, as per the message @Datamatt sent, I will be closing this complaint. Thank you all for your time.

Hello, @Datamatt and I will be taking this complaint. For my sanity, and Matt's. Please keep your posts short and concise. I do not want to read a 1000+ word essay each time I look at a post on this.

Hi, I have spent time considering this. I'm going to have to deny this trial. I want to see more improvement over a longer period of time regarding your ooc behavior, along with ic behavior. I will contact you over discord, explaining the ic portion of this if you want me to. Please feel free to re-apply at a later date. Thank you!

Hi, there is a disturbing lack of feedback here. Have you been advertising your app?

I will unban you. Sorry for this delay.

Alright. I'm going to grant you a trial, try to collect feedback throughout your trial. Trial Begins (AUG/21/2019) - Ends (AUG/28/2019)

I meant nothing else, the only issue I really saw was how blunt they were. No other staff member will be taking this, because I am closing the complaint. I have addressed the issue/issues at hand, and given you my response to them. I will talk to TT about being overly blunt, and that is it. It was an IC issue, staff are not required to give you context of anything. You could have sought out the context yourself, as a ghost. Telling you to find out icly is a legitimate response to something you could find out on your own. TT conducted themselves properly here, and nothing else needs to be addressed. I am sorry you did not agree with what happened here, but there is nothing else to discuss. If you wish to make a complaint regarding this resolution, go for it. Have a good one!

My mind still has not changed on this, and I still feel TT did their job properly. You may not feel that way, and we're not going to reach the same agreement. So, I'll tell you what. I will tell TT to be less blunt in tickets, such as this one. But that is it. No action will be taken against them for anything, as they did nothing wrong. It was an IC issue, and it wasn't something that required a long or even usual time investigation. I'm not touching anything else you said, as it will just lead us into a merry go round of brick walling. I have justified my thoughts in my previous posts, and do not need to do it again. I am sorry you feel that you were ignored and that TT was too obtuse/blunt with you. I will talk to them about being so blunt. Anything else before I close this complaint?

I'm sticking to the reason for your complaint. It was near the end of the round, they did answer your questions. "Find out icly". I also believe that TT did not do a sub par job. If this was a ticket that I handled, I would have done the exact same. Anything else you said, was not really relevant to the complaint. TT conducted themselves perfectly, investigated efficiently and handled it in a timely manner. I'm telling you that the resolution was fine, and that TT did nothing wrong here. What else do you want? You were not ignored.

It was investigated. Staff members are not required to tell you the lengths of the investigation. I spoke to them, they investigated, and they deemed the Berko thing an ic issue, which does not require much investigation. I am agreeing that it is an ic issue, and have decided that they have investigated well enough. You were a ghost, you could have scrolled up an searched for context if you really wanted it, but TT is not required to give you context/ic information.

I'm going to deem TT's actions valid in this complaint. "Find out Icly" is not mean spirited or intentionally obtuse, the staff member at hand does not have to give you context of anything. I assure you your frustration was taken seriously. TT handled the baldie comment, but the second "issue" was not an ooc issue. It is the same as someone walking up to you and saying your name repeatedly to annoy you. If I went "Ornias, Ornias, Ornias, Ornias" repeatedly, it'd annoy you. here is another example of annoying someone by saying their name/title repeatedly. Here I have nothing else to say about this complaint. I will be locking and archiving within the next 24 hours, unless you have anything to add.