ReadThisNamePlz

Hello, sorry for the extremely late response. I've been busy all day. So, let me explain what I was told my multiple witnesses, including a Primary Admin [mention]Alberyk[/mention] Witnesses saw you escape/get released by the mercenary, and as the mercenary was leaving (this is shown in the logs you posted "Bruce Chamberlain begins climbing up the ladder") you went into comms, commented on how he's mean, and put yourself in even more danger for a backpack that spews water- which, breaks our character preservation rules. I.E, avoid pain and play a relatively sane character. After this comment, you picked up an energy carbine- Which I'd imagine an everyday Janitor wouldn't know how to use considering there are two settings and all that. You then chased after the mercenary and gunned him down using the carbine, while being shot by lethal rounds from the mercenary. This goes back to ignoring the character preservation rules. The specific ones that you broke (in my mind) are- 1. Take into account your character's comfort, while this deals with hardsuits mainly, I can assure you, being shot multiple times is not comfortable. 2. Avoid pain. A sane, well-rounded character would not engage in actions that are overly painful, or put themselves in harm's way without consideration. You had a chance to escape the situation, but instead you decided to hunt down the mercenary after they were trying to relocate, and you then gunned them down, while being shot multiple times as well. In which you completely disregarded the pain from being shot several times, the merc emptied a magazine into you. 3. Additionally, keep your character's goals in mind. You were playing a janitor. Not a security officer, not a Head of Security or any kind of security member. A Janitor. You should have ran the moment you got the chance to, not stick around and fight. This also, in some sense, breaks immersion. 4. Generally, avoid playing hero. There are certain opportunities every character can seize to overthrow an antagonist, but going rambo on syndicate ops as a frail, unarmed medical doctor constitutes a failure to roleplay and will likely end with you getting shot. Also, if you are unarmed, and being held at gunpoint, it is generally expected for you to comply with your captor, or risk suffering the consequences. Specifically concerning melee combat: knowing advanced close quarters combat moves requires legitimate training, having it as a hobby or some such for a character who then uses this knowledge to expertly dislocate limbs will not fly. Unless trained, you should restrict yourself to standard punches, kicks, shoving, and grabbing/throwing. The forth one is very important, you are a Janitor. You should not be attempting to evacuate a bar full of people while a known threat is down there. If I remember correctly, an ERT was inbound and was prepared the handle the threat. Not only that, but you completely ignored the fact that you lacked any kind of protection when you picked up the carbine and engaged the mercenary who had ballistic weapons and other weapons at their disposal. You were not banned unjustly, I even asked for a few other opinions from staff that were online at the time, to make sure I wasn't banning you for no reason. A water backpack does not constitute the complete disregard for your characters well being. There are more than one on station, and you surely would have gotten it back once the ERT had handled the remaining mercenaries.

I've edited this to be a spoiler until the round is over. I won't delete your post, but do not remove the spoiler until the current round ends. Update: Spoiler removed, but do not post during the same round that this took place in.

Definitely a +1 from me. This application is nearly flawless. I absolutely believe she should get her whitelist, if she ends up not living up to the expectations, it can always be revoked. She is good with Roleplay, her characters are usually well thought out and played very well. I'm Avery, and I approve of this message. +1

Appeal denied due to the player disappearing.

Hello, [mention]Alberyk[/mention] and I will be taking this complaint as well.

Hello, [mention]Alberyk[/mention] and I will be handling this complaint.

Wow! Sorry for the late response. It has been a while, but you were ban evading it seems. Hence why your new account was banned. However, I will lift this, in about two weeks since you were ban evading, on the condition that you will follow the rules to the T. And you will not be hostile towards staff in the future. Deal?

Hello, I'd like to throw my two cents in considering I was the person who allowed Resilynn to actually go through with this. I gave them the go ahead after they ahelped requesting permission because you were, Joking about going to work with the intruders in a situation, security was busy dealing with the intruders or they were incapacitated/dead. And apparently teasing them from what Resi and you have both said. Those are the two main reasons I cleared this as an IC issue. Doc merely reinforced it. Now, I was not aware the CMO didn't talk to you or provide any real RP when they were sedating you, etc. I was under the impression that they would have provided some sort of RP, and according to you, they did not. Maybe that is my fault for not reinforcing it to them in the ticket they opened. I'm not handling this complaint, I just wanted to put the reasoning that this was decided to be an IC issue by myself. (Edited to make it a bit more clear that I got the teasing thing from the complaint.)

Hey there, I'll be 100% honest with you, I can't recall a single thing from this round. I do, however want to point out, that this shouldn't have any sway on their security ban, considering they were a Captain at the time, not a Head of Security or and security position at all. I'm fine with the warning being removed early if it wasn't warning worthy. It could have just been a large mistake on my part.

https://pastebin.com/HkX5rcpk Applicants interview

Hello, I will be contacting you on discord soon for your interview.

Hello there! I'd like to ask if you could go through and make the questions Bold for us, it makes it easier for us to read. Character names: This is just an example. Thank you!

Hello there! Sorry for my delayed response, I wrote one out earlier but didn't upload it, then I closed my browser and lost it T-T Allow me to dive into this, I received an ahelp regarding the chaplains religion, I took it and thought Schev said Captain. I simply misread that, my apologies. Now, onto the actual issue, I spoke to the chaplain about the religion, and they explained to me that it was not about memes, but instead memetics. Which, in his words are photo's that have special power to them to cause someone to stop breathing/stop a heart. Which, to me sounded like a sound thing to worship considering the game literally has sun gods, moon gods, space Jesus, a giant demon named Nar'sie, etc. I figured it'd be okay for him to worship something like that as long as his behavior followed the rules. I explained that the name "memeism" is not okay and he needed to change it, he agreed to that and we wrapped it up. No harm done really. I closed both tickets and thought nothing else of it. Now, regarding the chaplain causing issues and such, being disruptive, etc. I had no idea any of this was happening in the round, I was not paying attention to the chaplain, like, at all. While this is a mistake on my part, there were several new players and a lot of things going on in the round, so please forgive me and my lack of attention. The chaplains behavior was not ahelped a single time that round, only ahelp I received about the chaplain was from Schev. No one mentioned to me that he wrote a vulgar note in the brig, or tried to break into areas. While, I should have noticed this, I had other things going on in the game that I had to pay attention to. This is a very short version of my original reply, I'm just tired and don't have the energy to write the entire thing again.

Hey there, edit your original post with the format please.

+1 Very good at Role play and I'm willing to bet she will handle her command duties appropriately.

After some long and thought out discussion, [mention]Coalf[/mention] and I have decided that Tbear's ruling is faulty. However, he has admitted to this, and the complaint seems to have fixed itself on it's own. So, we will be removing any notes, warnings, etc that were received in the interaction (if any) and we hope both parties can move on comfortably and continue to enjoy the game-play on our server. No punishments are being applied to either player. Locking and Archiving.

Alright, after some little digging and some log pulling, I've come to the conclusion that you were indeed PM'd several times. I also do not believe an (ex)Admin would lie about you unloading on yourself. So, my conclusion is this - Appeal Denied. The earliest time you can re-appeal without it being auto denied will be the 29th of May 2018. " Please tell the truth next time, lying get's no one anywhere.

Alright, mind telling me why you needed to reload the pistol in the first place?

Hey there! Unfortunately the Admin that banned you has retired. So, I will be taking over this ban appeal. You've got a few notes regarding greytide actions. Dragging punpun and killing them with a knife, beating yourself while trying to get into a windoor, etc. I understand you're new and joined on the 11th of May 2018, you were permanently banned on the 13th of May 2018. The reason you were banned is because you logged off after being winded for an attempted suicide as a security cadet. The reloading claim doesn't really mix well with me. The reason for this is - I contacted the banning admin and they told me that you ignored multiple PM's about wearing a softsuit helmet while holding a baton, and when they continued to PM you, you continued to pull out your gun and unloaded into yourself, you then after running out of ammo for the pistol, took your taser and began to Taze yourself, you then logged after being banned. Do you still stand by your claim that you were trying to reload?

Hey there! I understand the struggle, ban lifted. Welcome back!

I'd like to throw in that I was the head of personnel during this round. I was also a vampire during this, I ended up claiming attempted murder/being attacked at surface cargo after the second vampire (Aziri/Kaed) attacked me and was showing no real interest to work with me. So that is where that charge came from, you also killed a Cargo Tech in front of me. This is just to explain the charges/warrant. I have nothing more to add.

A frat house IPC? God save us... +1 Unique story, I greatly enjoy the idea and he's not horrible at RP. If he ends up being horrible, his whitelist can always be removed.

Interview!

I will be contacting you over discord soon to conduct your interview. Thank you for your patience!

Alright, Appeal Denied, it has been nearly two days and you haven't said a thing here. Feel free to re-apply. Please follow my tips!