-
Posts
3,165 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Skull132's Achievements
Faithless (37/37)
1
Community Answers
-
did u konw. that with this september. Aurora has turned 11 yeas old. Woooo!
-
I wonder: has anyone written lore using ChatGPT yet?
- Show previous comments 11 more
-
What a disturbing thought from someone who was once in charge of Aurora's lore. That sort of thing might be fine if you are writing something that will only be seen by yourself (though I'd still argue it does nothing to improve your skill as a writer, and is ultimately a crutch), but as a lore-member you are writing things that will be used and interpreted by the community. I prefer to approach lore in a holistic manner - that is, all of the individual components matter, and should be used to bolster and improve the greater concept they contribute to. To say any part of it doesn't matter or is frivolous makes me think we're writing from two entirely different viewpoints. Players have shown that they will use every little bit of lore you give them, and that a lot of them like the little nitty gritty details. Even if they didn't, making sure what you write clicks together cleanly is just good practice. Again, I find this attitude very strange for someone on the lore-team. I do not think you should be using AI.
-
For the sake of clarity, I will say that most wide-spread large language models or art generation models that exist currently are probably responsible for a wide array of copyright and intellectual property breaches in their training. But, hopefully in the not-so-far-future, more localized and sanitary models come around...
But if even the concept of AI is reprehensible, what about resources like algorithmic (fantasy) name generators? Or using writing reference materials from other fictions?
While I get the pride element of not using AI -- I don't use it either, for often similar reasons, but I don't mind if my colleagues or subordinates do (unless they leak IP/confidential info or I see them emitting AI garbo in their final output) -- what I don't get is just outright saying it's not an even acceptable tool.
-
Everyone writes considerably differently and tackles things in their own ways. I often used name generators, but couldn't exactly get it to produce what I wanted and that is when AI comes into play. You can refine it with your own thoughts, and it spits out small details that you yourself might struggle with coming up with. Dionae are a unique species with a significantly more alien feel that I've ever written for. I disagree with using it for writing something that could ultimately have a greater impact on the lore, but for things that I believe are small, I see no reason why they can't be used like how name generators have been used. I have used it to create Skrell names (darn their q's, u's and other things), making up names for ship classes that I then build a description off of. I don't see why 'name generators' are an acceptable tool, but artificial intelligence is not.
I've already brought it up with the Lore Team, and there is a desire for a policy to be set.