SierraKomodo

Just to clarify: Is this going to be using a custom sprite or just the sprite of a pink screwdriver with a custom name?

I'd personally suggest using a regular charger instead of a heavy duty charger. Why should mining get better chargers than engineering and security get?

I'm not an official developer (Although I do contribute occasionally), but I can also say I wouldn't feel like shifting through Bay's code to grab the relevant stuff, make sure it works with our changes, etc etc. If it's so easy, what's stopping you from going in and making the adjustments and testing it yourself, then sending a pull request? https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora

I'm no longer going to be working on this; Another DO wil take over when (and if) they decide to do it.

TO: Sura Cantara, NSS Aurora FROM: Jonathan Rase, Duty Officer, NMSS Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is a courtesy message to inform you I have been assigned to this incident report and will be proceeding with an investigation shortly. We will need to speak with you, and all other parties involved with this incident, prior to a final decision being reached. If we are unable to contact everyone within a week's time, we will have to make a decision without their input. -------------------- DTG: 11-10:12-TAU CETI STANDARD-10-2457 SIGN: Jonathan Rase

FROM: Jonathan Rase, Duty Officer, NMSS Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: Investigation closed: The original complaintant wishes to drop the Incident Report as they believe the offender did not act with hostile intentions. If no objections are raised, the IR can be closed.-------------------- DTG: 10-13:23-TAU CETI STANDARD-10-2457 SIGN: Jonathan Rase

TO: Elena Raschnikova, NSS Aurora FROM: Jonathan Rase, Duty Officer, NMSS Odin SUBJECT: Command Report -------------------- BODY: Due to a lack of response from both the filer of this incident report and the person being reported, we are concluding this investigation. As we have received witness testimony from multiple persons indicating a violation of Command staff orders and regulation, Desiree Green shall be suspended from the Robotics lab for two weeks, starting today, to expire on the 24th of October. -------------------- DTG: 10-13:19-TAU CETI STANDARD-10-2457 SIGN: Jonathan Rase

Muffet shouts, "ERROR. FREDDY DOES NOT FUCK A WATERMELON IN THIS BOOK. THIS BOOK IS NOTHING BUT LLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS- - AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--!!"

Willow [145.9] states, "Unit Willow will have to ask Mr. Callahan to stop wanking Roboticist Snyder."

TO: Elena Raschnikova, NSS Aurora FROM: Jonathan Rase, Duty Officer, NMSS Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is a courtesy message to inform you that I have been assigned to this incident report. Be aware that all parties have 1 week from the time this response is sent to meet with myself or another duty officer before a final decision is reached. -------------------- DTG: 04-0639-TAU CETI STANDARD-10-2457 SIGN: Jonathan Rase

TO: Chris Blade, NSS Aurora FROM: Jonathan Rase, Duty Officer, NMSS Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: Due to an inability to get ahold of Chris Watson and other parties involved, this incident report will be archived. In the event we are able to get into contact with Chris Watson in a reasonable amount of time, this incident report will be re-opened. -------------------- DTG: 04-0625-TAU CETI STANDARD-10-2457 SIGN: Jonathan Rase

I like option two. It gives me an ability to create one or two 'antag' slots whom Ican then name when and if the time comes around

This will be on tomorrow's pull request.

This will be on tomorrow's custom item pull request. Also, I decided to see what happens if you set force to 99999999999999999999999 and hit someone: http://bts.sierrabrown.me/asrge.PNG

Swat's making a sprite for when the item's worn, then it'll be tested. Code work's done.

Code work's done. This will be on the next pull request this saturday (October 3) And yes, the labcoat can be button/unbuttoned now since you provided the sprites for those two states

Hm, while I know this would require additional coding, a possible longer- term idea could be to have persons with both whitelists able to trade their tradeband+1 other language for a race specific language. (I.e., instead of having Tradeband and being able to select Gutter or Sign, you can have Siik'maas)

Hahaha those funny quotes and shenanigans from Aurora

Sprites done, code's done. This will be in the weekly pull request this upcoming saturday.

Just going to counter this by saying that when Rasul was cloned, the evacuation shuttle had already left the station. I /think/ we were already on the Odin for that matter when he got back on radio to talk with Miraj, so there wasn't really anywhere to evacuate to at that point. Plus, there's still the matter that the round was effectively over. I was on the Odin messing around more than doing any legitimate RP, like taking people on a tour of the Odin, showing them the 'complaints department' (A door that leads into space. No, it wasn't grief - Odin is unsimulated so there's no airflow and nobody was dumb enough to jump out. Except me.).

Well, admins permitting, I can make the sprite Baka suggested into a common item, and your custom item could get another sprite?

As a quick note, parts of that log (Not all of it though) were radio transmissions on science of them talking with Miraj. Mainly the parts about owing dinner and such.

I'd have to disagree with this. Letting him come on station with these grenades, even if it's only as a chemist and with them empty, has just undermined and put him about another character that's been ICly developing a similar device, and I think this would be used to imply 'I dont need approval or paperwork, the fact I can bring these materials means I'm pre-approved by Central'.

Should we be removing any possibility for third party contributions (and thus risk making complaints very one-sided), when posts could also be dealt with on a case-by-case basis? If the post someone has is actually relevant to the complaint thread - I.e. they were involved in some manner and can actually provide additional input/another side - I see no problems with them posting. When we get bandwagonning, shitposting, etc from people that were not involved in the incident in question at all, then it's a problem.

i think the rule's fine; You shouldn't be cluttering a player complaint thread with irrelevant things/opinions if you don't have anything to add to the thread.