Jump to content

TishinaStalker

Members
  • Posts

    1,586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TishinaStalker

  1. Alright then, I have no further questions or lines of discussion to pursue until Analyst and Nur'Sie give us more insight on the situation. I'll make sure they're aware of this complaint.
  2. Do you still have a staff complaint then? It sounds more like you have a lore question and not a staff complaint.
  3. Lemme just ask a different question because I didn't really mean to say you were hands down accusing her of it because I can read the part where you said "seems like". Would you still consider it seeming like a personal vendetta at that point? Nur'Sie pursuing the way she did seemed reasonable off of how that part of the wiki could've been interpreted. Erm, you're talking about non-sentient creatures that can come back and will always be hostile to you. This doesn't really hold any water for the situation. I never said they were incapable of violence. I'm pretty sure a species being incapable of violence is impossible. But lets get more to the point. I'm going to assume you are playing a bound Vaurca, please correct me if you weren't. Unless your hive is telling you "Literally go kill that dude for hurting you", then you're not going to do it. Self-defense, like we've already determined, is a natural, immediate respond. If you attack me, then I'm going to either run or defend myself. If you attack me and then I managed to get away or you run away, then I, out of my own free will (and free will is incredibly important when you are playing a bound Vaurca), have to make the conscious decision (two more, important words) to decide to go after you and try to hurt you.
  4. From the Vaurca wiki page. My best guess, based on this is no, they would not have a concept of revenge. Unless you very oft. see cyborgs attacking people out of revenge; which we don't as far as I'm aware. I can definitely see why Nur'Sie would've stopped and asked you about the situation before. You explicitly asked to "hunt him down and kill him" as a drone. This would not be okay. The wiki states that you could fight back in self defense if they were in the process of attacking you, but them having left, and you hunting them down would not be aligned with drone lore for Vaurca. I would've personally stopped you for the same thing based on the same interpretation. Where exactly is Nur'Sie's personal vendetta against you outside of a reasonable ahelp?
  5. Moved to appropriate sub.
  6. Application approved. Glory to Aurora
  7. Please get more feedback. You can advertise your application once per round on OOC.
  8. Application approved. Glory to Aurora
  9. Please try to get more feedback. You can advertise your whitelist once per round on OOC.
  10. Fine by me. Appeal denied. Good luck with your studies.
  11. No you weren't. After this, there was no logs of you on the server until the failed access log today. Well you didn't. At all. From yesterday This was all the CCIA and Captain logs leading up to the disarming. This is not only a harsh lesson in EoR grief, but also a harsh lesson on being security. If they tell you "Go detain X", then you don't roll up and start wordlessly attacking them if they're not a threat. That is literally not how Security works. You only have yourself to blame here once again. From yesterday That's not what this is telling me. This is telling me the exact opposite. Look at Skull for that one. His last note, previous to the ban, called for a week ban. Although, to be fair, it more explicitly says "If similar situation repeats" with said similar situation being completely ignoring pain RP in order to robust. Seemed more fitting to get week banned for EoR as opposed to bad RP in this sense though. Would you rather be week banned for bad RP or for EoR? I'd choose the latter because it makes the most sense in-terms of the ban length ordered by Skull.
  12. You were not caught by staff before the round reset for some unknown reason. I had to come in from off server during class after being messagedby Sierra. Usually when this happens, people have the common sense to stay on the server the next round in case staff need to talk to them because they understand they broke the rules. You were observing the round, but logged off when I finished gathering information from logs. That is a blatant lie. The next day after the round would be today. From today It is impossible for you to have played today because you were banned in the round after the EoR grief. Soooo, you stunned him because he cut in line? From yesterday's round This is every log that involved you on the Odin. You didn't try anything. All you did was wordlessly go up and start disarming people, stunning Houssam, and then throwing a flashbang. In fact, here is your second lie, nobody ordered Houssam to the brig. Not a single time was an attempt at communication made with him before you resorted to disarming and stunning. I don't know what's going through your head that's telling you "Yeah, this was okay for me to do on the Odin or at all as Security personnel." That is your last lie. The flashbang was primed as shown above. Whether you threw one or a dozen flashbangs is irrelevant. You shouldn't be throwing flashbangs at all on the Odin because of the rule that you should know very well as a long standing player. I did not make a hasty ruling. I gathered information first and I acted from there. You were guilty of end of round grief and you were banned for it. I never said any IC reports would be coming. Do not put words in my mouth. Lastly, do not misrepresent/lie about any facts. You are forgetting that I have access to the server logs. If you misrepresent or lie about a fact, then I will find out. I am the last person you want to lie or misrepresent facts to, and I am now very reluctant to unban you for it.
  13. Huh, was not aware that it was disabled. I don't normally vote game mode. The premise of Mutiny is that there's a comms blackout with Central Command after they send an emergency directive to be followed; and that's where loyalists and mutineers come from with the head loyalist (usually captain) and head mutineer having disks for the emergency auth. device in the vault. Messages to Central are completely ignored by staff and ERT cannot be called.
  14. Central Command will not respond during the mutiny game mode.
  15. Whatever admin did this deserves to beloved and appreciated; it was me.
  16. Where can I get this game?
  17. Then no, you can stay as a player for all I care. I will not support your app.
  18. I already asked Skull for it. Waiting on a reply.
  19. Don't give a fuck. Be safe. That is possibly a stupid idea because you will breach your lab and fuck yourself, but doable. Mixing room is not plasma fire proof and relies on you knowing when to vent. That is a stupid idea because you will breach your lab and fuck yourself. Xenobiology pen is not plasma fire proof. Don't give a fuck. Be safe.
  20. Hrm, fair enough. How would we stop this new sub from getting cluttered with lore stuff though?
  21. Not anymore.
  22. What about the wiki? If it's life on earth, then just make a section on the page called Life on Earth (which I'm surprised this doesn't exist on its page yet), and you win. War story or unrest in a frontier world sounds like news. Boom, news.
  23. Hueh. I'm fully aware of what you wrote. I want who you're applying with to be 30 in the application. Set his age to 30 in the application since you plan on aging him anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...