Zelmana

Ah, thank god you came to this conclusion. I think this is a bad update and will do absolutely nothing but start drama, and is pushing political shit for 4noraisin. I don't like this opinion. I don't like this opinion being held by a developer. I think that your suggested updates should be dismiss-able upon any arbitrary reason we come up with, if we come to a disagreement as a community.

Then I think we're at a good understanding. You create feedback threads, and believe a few things about the feedback you recieve: it is utterly useless, unwelcome, and is stale, boring, and negative. You do not tolerate "shitty" feedback. If you are unable to ignore said feedback, do not request it. Follow the advice that "everyone [...] including staff," says that you should- stop making feedback requests. When a fisherman casts his net into the sea, he should not complain when he catches weeds. You, the fisherman, should look only for the fish. If you are not catching fish, stop casting your net. There's nothing more I will be stating on this issue.

We will be looking into the constructive response guidelines on complaint threads to maybe lessen future incidents like this one in the future. This thread will be locked, archived, and marked as resolved in 24 hours from this post.

Hello! Sorry for the very long delay on this matter. Other things got in the way. Down to the meat and potatoes... This complaint seemed to had been handled a long while ago, and there were some legitimate grievances that were brought up in the original complaint. This is going to be very blunt and to the point, without sugarcoating anything. If certain parties are offended at us saying that you are easily offended, the point proves itself. Anyway- Burger has a tendency to dish out jokes and heated discussions, but often times complains or is offended when they or their projects are subject to similar jokes/discussion. Schev has a tendency to enter discussions they are not involved in at all and input their perspective. Commentary, although needed in some places, should be handled with tact. Advice to Burger: Some of these will relate to the original reasons / screen-grabs on the complaint. The Aurora Staff has an ability to moderate the community. That's usually always just the server, forums, and discord server. We step in sometimes on issues that come up about direct messages. For the ss13 Reddit community, if you feel there is an issue, please report it via the mods on r/ss13 If you feel that people are not contributing /providing feedback to the discussion yet complain about it on Reddit or general- this isn't against the rules. People complain all the time. There is no rule that states "you can only complain if you intend to fix the problem or work to help it". If people see something they don't like, they can say it without providing alternatives. There are a lot of issues that are best dealt with individually- between the person who you have an issue with and yourself. While we'd like you to continue reporting possible incidents, it may be best to deal with minor issues yourself. Advice to Schev: You should dial it back. I would highly suggest that you do not insert yourself into discussions that you're not involved with, i.e. a player complaining about something on a complaint thread. Those usually work by have person A complain about person B to staff. Person C should not insert their opinion in unless it is a general complaint and not about a specific event involving said people. It would be best practice to talk to the handling staff regarding the behavior you do not agree with instead of provide peanut gallery commentary. And as for the reopening of the ticket, I think it was already addressed previously. The only rules that Schev may possibly be breaking is rule 2 and that they are inserting themselves into discussions in complaint threads, as well as some of their jokes being ill-placed. Are you expecting someone to be punished for joking about things? It is best advised that if you do not like their conversation that you do not converse with them. Do as jackboot has done and simply block them. While this will not completely resolve the issue, it will decrease your interactions with them. If you still believe that you are being mistreated or offended at their toxicity after doing so, that's another issue.

I went back to review the relevant tickets, as well as the game-mode overall. To ensure privacy, I will not be posting the logs publicly but have put them within the staff discussion areas for transparency purposes. Validation of these logs may be requested by another staff if you wish. Here's a breakdown of the compiled logs in a format that does not disclose players ckeys or character names: Looking over all of this during the game-mode, including multiple tickets regarding your malpractice as a medical cyborg, prompts me to look into past incidents. 60% of said past incidents include the abuse or misuse of synthetic (cyborg, ai, drone) abilities or roleplay expectations. Due to a past of abuses of these roles, I thought I was being a bit lenient when only banning you from the cyborg role, in hopes that you would appeal with a reasonable explanation. Overall, I stand by my original reason- I do not believe that you have played the role with sufficient knowledge of your chosen medical module, and in doing so failed to properly play said role. Although you did not overdose the individual, pumping them with so many various things all at once as, dragging them from yellow dock to medbay with heavy wounds should be enough considering past incidents. (As well as considering the inability to clone, but that may have been due to issues outside of your control as a medical cyborg).

Thank you both, I'm flattered.

BYOND Key: Character Names:http://prntscr.com/j6lozq Species you are applying to play: IPC Have you read our lore section's page on this species?: Yes Please provide well articulated answers to the following questions in a paragraph format. One paragraph minimum per question Why do you wish to play this specific race: I want to play as an IPC because I find them interesting. I enjoy their interactions between the other races, and like the fact that they are different than all of them because they lack actual biology. In playing this race, I hope to be able to create some fun and interesting roleplay for others. I can achieve that via playing a realistic and believable IPC. I think that I would enjoy playing their robotic mannerisms, as well as provide commentary on the discussion about synthetic intelligence, and overall what it means to be "a person". Human and synthetic interaction is something that I would like to attempt at a more intelligent level than cyborgs. Identify what makes role-playing this species different than role-playing a Human: Playing an IPC is very different. The main reason is that they are non-biological, which presents a large amount of contrast. They are created with purpose, and act upon that purpose within their directives, protocols, or laws. Mechanically within the game, they are also very different for the same reason. Playing an IPC offers the ability, mechanically, to act differently that others in a variety of situations (or fall to them, if there are Ion weapons or EMPs). Their attempt to understand humanity or biology can impact their roleplay and interactions with others. They have mannerisms, or perhaps more accurately, a lack of certain mannerisms that may develop within other species. Character Name:Cerebel Please provide a short backstory for this character, approximately 2 paragraphs Cerebel's namesake comes from their eldest predecessor, a simple tool. Nameless and completely primitive in design, the software was used by the medical field to analyze the wavelengths and patterns within the brain to better understand emotion. Over time and through development cycles and processes, the tools began to become more and more complex. With the addition of artificial intelligence, the tools were better able to form hypothesis on the massive amounts of data they sifted through. This tool, however, was only that- a tool. At least, until Zeng-Hu's Psychology Research Department began working on the most recent predecessors of the Synth-Psych project. Cerebel is the designation of one of these IPCs. Developed and manufactured by Zeng-Hu, Cerebel's purpose is to assist or replace psychologists or neuroscientists. Their directive reflect their intent to perform research, with a focus on how the human mind functions and works. Just as humans must craft a mirror to look at their visage, so do humans need to develop tools such as Cerebel to look within. Since its manufacture date, Cerebel has been turing within Zeng-Hu's Research Department. Finally ready for deployment, they are looking forward to working within the research station. This specific model, bound for the NSS Aurora, is a shell chasis. They have been designed to look rather attractive, mimicking a male with a sharp jaw and short cut blond hair. Their protocols ensure that the following lay at the very base of their "being": Observe Everything. Question the mind. Reflect Humanity based on observations. What do you like about this character? I think that I will enjoy this character based on the fact that their purpose is to be curious. I have always enjoyed playing detective or investigative roles on the station, so I think making a more medically focused type of that investigation feel would be a nice change. The addition of playing this type of character as an IPC allows me to do a lot of commentary and character relation development in a different way, seeing that it compliments the investigative way I'll play the character. How would you rate your role-playing ability? Well. Notes: Thank you for reading and considering my application.

[mention]Eve[/mention] You took the words right out of my mouth. I agree with this wholeheartedly. I believe that delivery of constructive criticism is an area that Soviet could receive some guidance on. Yesterday, they received a warning in regards to how they delivered criticism and how things may sometimes go too far. However, they continually bring up points that are extremely valid, and imo should not be punished for doing so. Voicechat on discord should not require a helmet and bubble wrap. Banter, such as calling people "thots" is common place. People call each other names to a varying degree of banter. "Cuck", "Retard", etc. are all examples. It happens. Intent is what should be regulated. They have received both disciplinary action as well as continued guidance on this issue. While I am within the voice chat, things are often settled between groups of players. People go from arguing passionately and spite w/ malice to forgiving one another and going on about their night laughing together. Due to this, incidents like these are hard to moderate. Because of this, we need specificity and direct messages to properly handle situations. There have been numerous times where this has not occurred, and players simply fussily leave, with no reporting. In terms of voicechat, moderation and action requires a degree of reporting. Thanks.

I agree. It is very loud and annoying.

Hi Euan, I have looked over this unban request, and have decided, with the consult of other staff members, to lift your permanent ban. I would request that you read the rules in its entirety before playing on the server again. Please create / develop a well rounded and sane character. Furthermore, please attempt to roleplay with quality, and avoid self-inflicting yourself. When players are contacted or winded by members of staff, please wait a moment to reply, and we will usually get things sorted out in a fair and balanced manner. Please be aware that if you return to the server and attempt actions similar to this one you will have to wait a period of time before making another appeal. Welcome back to the server, please read the rules.

I did not ban you. Your ban reason is incorrect. You have posted a ban appeal during the same active round that the ban was made.

Hi Abo, My activity may seem sporadic and distant due to timezones, yes. I'm on EST timezone. My full schedule is listed above, but I can go into some more detail. Mondays I am free basically all day, Tuesday I have networking classes from 8-12, but I usually leave around 11am. Tuesday evening I may spend time with the girlfriend. Wednesday through Friday I have an internship program where I work 9am-3pm. Saturday I'm free, and do a mix of ss13 and studying. Sunday, I attend religious services and most of my day with my girlfriend and then at night (9pm-??) I am available. In brief, here's a general example of my activity. Monday: 2-3 rounds depending on study-load Tuesday: 1-3 Wed and Thurs you can expect 1-2 rounds each night. Friday I typically play 3-4 rounds Saturday 3-5 rounds (depending on schedule) Sunday night: 2-3 rounds. I'd also like to note that I am very very active in the Discord voice channels, as well as the text channels (though not movies, video games, or book channels). And am available via ping during most all my waking hours. My obligations are fairly standard: college, time with my girlfriend, my internship. Whenever I am on my PC (even during studying) I have a dedicated Discord monitor, and often times will have Aurora opened up to the lobby as well. I think the question of activity is infact due to timezones or mere coincidence.

After a few more conversations about this, I want to make it more clear that the xenophillia public record statement was a joke, intended to end / start the interview on a lighthearted note.

This sounds like something that should have been looked into via an adminhelp, or via a player complaint depending on the round type and other circumstances.

+1 I've been mistakenly attempting this a few times. We need to be able to transport bodies better with bags.

+1, Over the year or so that Hunter has been on Aurora I have seen him progress in Science operations. I feel that his roleplay capability is up to par with Command-level requirements. He show apt skill in various areas of the mechanics (except biomechanical repairs), and I feel that he has the science roleplay figured out. Looking at this application, however, it is clear that this is one of the situations where a character is made for application purposes to gain whitelist. I have not roleplayed or seen the character that is on this application, but I feel from prior experience with his main character and his officer character, Marcus, that the traits that are required of Command will translate over. Please note there may be a slight bias to this +1, but in honesty I feel that it is well earned and deserved. OOCly, I believe that Hunter is attempting their best to make situations better, and make roleplay interesting. They are passionate about anything they do, so I feel that they could take this and run with it if given the chance.

Hi Catnip! Sure thing. 1) My current thought on how the staff team operates? Well, I think that they operate fairly transparently and keep their project open to the community via discord or github. I think that I would choose to change the internal position changing or recruiting responsibilities in staff already. However, I think this is a complex issue that has more factors than staff, and I believe we try to combat this issue sufficiently. 2) For forum complaints, reports, and such I feel fine handling. I am not a very regular forum user but I feel that I can evaluate situations or complaints made on the forums with a fine tooth comb. Moderating Discord alongside server operations sounds like something I already do- being a regular voice / text channel user on the Aurora discord I find myself reminding players of the rules (mainly meta) or helping often. 3) The xenophillic tendencies of the ISD is an issue that I think can only be solved within character, as it is only an in character issue. As stated within the interview I did not wish for it to impact the interview and don't wish that statement to be taken seriously at all. As a position of staff I would not address this non-issue. 4) I would like to add that the response time on this is much quicker than I expected, and thanks to the multiple inspectors on this application.

Server Moderator Application Basic Information Byond Account: zelmana Character Name(s): Sean Brianne, Seb Quill, Hatius Black, Arnar Glint, Levi Fletcher AI Name(s): none or generic things like S73V3. I change them routinely. Discord username + tag: Zelm#5304 Age: 19 Timezone: EST (UTC - 4:00) When are you on Aurora?: Monday: randomly 10am - 11pm Tuesday: throughout the day after 1pm Wed-Fri: after 3:30pm Sat: Usually play a few rounds Sun: Late nights. All of this is a good guess as I also balance my time with schoolwork, studying, and social. Experience How long have you played SS13?: Since Aug 10, 2014 How long have you played on Aurora: 995 days How much do you know about SS13 (Baystation build) game mechanics?: A lot. Enough to be ROBUST if needed. I know the ins and outs of a lot of the minor mechanics. (Though, sometimes I may wish to check with staff if I am doing something risky). I am able to understand mechanics code but not write it. Do you have any experience moderating for an SS13 server?: No. Have you ever been banned, and if so, how long and why?: No. Personality Why do you play SS13?: I enjoy ss13 because the mechanics is very vast. A game with so many mechanics and processes, which are highly detailed, allow for a great roleplay environment. Roleplay on ss13 is great due to this amount of detail, as well as the sense of community and type of people who are interested in ss13. Why do you play on Aurora?: I play on Aurora because it is one of few good HRP servers. I found that Aurora's community allows for a lot of involvement in development. Whether it is lore, code, or general aspects of the server, the community is very involved. I feel that the ruleset is just in terms of roleplay and behavioral rules, and I've come to make a lot of friends here, as well as bring some of my own. What do moderators do?: I think being a moderator for the server is to act as an extension of higher staff. (Read: slaves) On a more serious note, I think that the moderator team serves a purpose to be the eyes and ears, as well as primary helpers and assistants to the community. Moderators and staff should not be an iron fist, but rather a guiding hand when dealing with players. What does it mean to be a moderator for our server?: A moderator for the Aurora server is a complex beast. They monitor the in game interactions, whether it be mechanics or roleplay. They compare what is going on within the round to the ruleset, and analyze how the round is playing to ensure that it is being played within those rules. Another responsibility is to deal with player reports given through adminhelp. When a player requests an issue to be looked into, it is up to the moderator and the extended team to address it. Moderators may also moderate the discord for metagaming and the compliance with Discord server rules. Above all, the most important aspect of a moderator on Aurora is communication. Communication with the staff team, as well as communication with the playerbase is paramount to success. Refer to my answer about the qualities of a good moderator for a more detailed description on why this is important. Why do you want to be a moderator?: As mentioned above, I'd like to help out the server where they need assistance. I find myself routinely reporting issues to the staff ingame or on external (like Discord) and believe that I would be able to assist these issues more directly. I believe that if I am able to work with the moderator and staff team I would be able to help staff more effectively. What qualities do you possess that would make you a good moderator?: I believe moderators should have tact. Although there are times where I can look back and see where I have not had it, generally, I feel that I am capable of handling situations tactfully. A good moderator should perform a self examination of their role- they are a moderator. They should moderate. To moderate successfully we must remain unbiased, and seek an outcome that is beneficial to all parties involved. Rules and protocols should be enforced, but those rules serve a purpose, and users should be properly instructed and disciplined with a solid judgement. How well do you handle stress, anger, or insults?: I deal with anger, stress, and insults fairly well. However, I believe that there is a fine line of just anger. There are certain things and topics that people should be angry about, or compassionate enough to object or discuss with passion. It is important to think meta-cognitively about how to properly handle stress and anger. There have been a few times where I have been angry about topics where I believe I have been wronged, but after discussion I find that me and the other party end up in good terms and a joint understanding. There has been one instance where this has not been the case, and it was an incident involving the NT-ISD discord, which I would like to put out there for transparency sake. Myself and the other individuals were unable to agree upon the governance of the affiliated Discord. Anything Else You Want to Add: Thanks for reading my application, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on Discord.

Reporting Personnel: Hatius C. Black Rank of Reporting Personnel: Internal Affairs Agent Game ID: bR2-cX16 Personnel Involved: - Lilah Novi, MD (Chemist): Offender (@LilahNovi) - Valorallen Vitellia, Captain: Other / Supervisor Time of Incident: Real time: 0900 GMT 20/12/17 Location of Incident: Medical Bay Nature of Incident: []Accident/Injury []Destruction of Property [x]Neglect of Duty []Harassment []Assault []Misconduct [x]Other: Medical Malpractice Overview of the Incident: Names redacted for privacy. Dr. Lilah Novi reanimated [REDACTED FOR PRIVACY] , an individual with a Do Not Clone (DNC) notation. When this individual was cloned, their mental state was distressed. They proceeded to rampage within the Medbay before an undisclosed Officer resolved the incident. [REDACTED FOR PRIVACY] was pronounced dead following the incident. Did you report it to a Head of Department or IAA? If so, who?: After arriving aboard the NSS AURORA, Captain Vitellia alerted me of the incident that had occurred before my arrival. I received the case paperwork and faxed them to the CCIA COMM RELAY promptly. Due to time limitations, a crew transfer shuttle was called, and I had to resume this case at a later time. No Chief Medical Officer was present during my time on board. Actions taken: During the shift, Dr. Lilah Novi was terminated from their position within the Medical Department. An injunction placed by Captain Vitellia barred them from medical practice or entering the Medbay in the shift. Captain Vitellia requested that I bring the matters of negligence and medical malpractice to the CCIA for review and investigation.

Head of Security Guide https://wiki.aurorastation.org/index.php?title=Head_of_Security | Requirements, Qualifications, and Role Overview The requirements of a Head of Security (sometimes referred to as Commander) are fairly simple. An individual must be at least thirty years of age, and meet the minimum of ten years of experience in security-related fields. A Bachelor’s or Master’s degree from a relevant University is also required. Further unlisted qualifications involve the ability to act under pressure, making quick decisions, and competency and understanding of the Command role. A Head of Security is one of the most impactful roles on a round, so it is extremely important that they are able to roleplay with tact and fullness of character. The role overview for a Commander is simple- you are responsible for maintaining the safety and assets of Nanotrasen via commanding your subordinates. The Internal Security Department (ISD) is a very diverse field, as it contains detectives, CSI, Officers, Warden, and of course, the lowly Cadet. In order to be successful HoS, you should be familiar with the interdependence of these roles, and how they operate- all while maintaining the composure to not do the roles themselves. Remember, you are the one who gives orders, not the one who does them. | Briefing / Start of Round At the round start, you will be met with the majority of your Security Department. Most ISD loathe briefings, but you can make them both fun and bearable if you keep it short, sweet, and fun. Quickly inform them of a briefing over Comms, to prevent people from rushing out. Next, state your overall requirements of your Officers such as labelling lockers or stating their response to ISD calls. Finally- wait, you’re done? Yes, a good briefing should be short, getting your orders across, all while maintaining a good roleplay environment. Orders or requirements for individuals, such as certain Officers or the Warden should be done after briefing, to allow everyone to gear up. | The Law You are not The Law. You enforce it. Corporate Regulations, albeit a contract, are the “law” of Nanotrasen. In order to properly act as HoS you must understand how the Corporate Regulations function. It is often up to your discretion on whether or not individuals gain leeway within the regulations. Which, of course, can be overruled by the Captain or Central Command. In some cases, you may have an Internal Affairs Agent onboard. They may help you interpret the regulations and advise the proper disciplinary or regulatory actions to take. | the Brig and Warden The Brig is the fortress that the ISD resides in. Yet, it is not the HoS who is in charge of it. That responsibility falls to The Warden. You must understand that the Warden is the keeper of the Brig, but the Warden must understand that you are their overseer. Due to this relationship, you may set certain expectations of your Warden and Brig. The relationship between the Head of Security and The Warden is an important one. The Warden, like all members of the ISD, fall under your command. Therefore, it is good practice that you request (via order) the Warden to do the following: Take full inventory of the armory, and have it faxed to both the Captain’s desk as well as your Office. Have badges from his storage at the ready for Officers Fill out and keep the appropriate paperwork for distribution of weapons and equipment Another thing to mention about the Brig is organization- it would be wise to request that the Warden and Officers keep the Brig in good, clean condition. Organization is also key- if possible, ensure that Officers label their lockers with their name. The CSI should also keep a labelled inventory of evidence based on case, etc. | A Situation Arises Due to the nature of SS13, there will be situations that require your attention. You may wish to coordinate with other members of Command to ensure that the station is on the appropriate alert-level depending on what threat may ail it. In the event that you need to have Officers retrieve weapons from the armory, a helpful Armory Doors button on your desk will raise the large doors in the armory. During certain situations like these, it is acceptable that the Warden not require Equipment / Weapons requisition papers to be filled out, at your discretion. Organization is also important for situation response. It is up to the Head of Security to rally his Officers to respond to situations. Note, the Head of Security should not always be the one launching themselves into battle, but should instead encourage and order your subordinates to do so on your behalf. There are, however, many situations and rounds that require you immediate action. In these circumstances, it is important that you act with the entirety of ISD, and not as a lone wolf. Governance during situations is what allows Nanotrasen to prevail. | Not Just an Order-Giver One of the most common reasons an individual may be unfit to be HoS is social. A Commander should wish to not only give orders, but to take part of the conversation roleplay going on. Your role is not only to be the leader of the ISD, but to further roleplay experiences, and overall increase the fun of the round. A HoS with a good character development, as well as social-ability is needed to be successful.

I'd like to be the first to personally vouch for the behavior and overall helpfulness of Amory. Note that I can be fairly biased due to friendship, but in this regards I believe that it is this friendship that gives him the merit needed for the moderator duty. Not only is Amory a kind and helpful individual, they will give their honest opinion despite bias. Furthermore, I believe that their helpfulness in both moderating disputes as well as grievances is suitable for helping as a mod. I'll support them. +1 (not that votes matter on moderator apps.)

I think that it would be beneficial to have the recently added old-code bar tending recipes taken off of the wiki once more. Yes, there may be some players that complained about the old recipes not being on the wiki, but the whole "cool" aspect of these special items like Mint Juleps are the fact that you either have to: be taught how to make them icly, or dive into the code to find the recipes in dream maker. Overall, I think it would benefit rp to have some of those recipes remain secretive or generally unknown to most.

While the times I have roleplayed with Ellie have been numbered, the interactions have been fantastic. They display a great understanding of roleplay and hold all of the qualities I would think make someone a good fit for head whitelist. +1

BYOND Key: Zelmana Character name: Sean Brianne Item name: Ceramic Teapot Why is your character carrying said item to work? Sean Brianne has always been a regulation man. It has been ten years since the Nanotrasen absorption and requisition of the private military company he previously worked for, and all of that time has been serving the internal security force of NT. As Sean rose the to the rank of Officer, he has developed a great pride and sense of gratitude towards the company. This loyal bond is sown in his dedicated work. As he finished his training and certification to be selected as a Head of Security, he sought out a symbolic representation of his loyalty to the company. As it came up in casual conversation, a superior at Central Command seemed to know just the right thing. Commissioned using a portion of the allotted funds for Years of Service Awards, Nanotrasen has given the blue ceramic pot to Sean Brianne as a welcoming gift to his new role. Made of alumina ceramic, a super-hard ceramic, this teapot is meant to symbolize the unbreakable loyalty found in some of NT's command staff. The piece is glazed in a shiny blue, reminiscent of traditional command and NT colors. Next, the abbreviated "NT" is gilded onto the teapot before a final clear coat. After its completion, the teapot was delivered to Sean Brianne in a small private ceremony, consisting of a CCIA and Nanotrasen representative. Item function(s): A container for tea. It works just like the current teapot ingame. Item description: "A blue ceramic teapot, gilded with the abbreviation for Nanotrasen." Item appearance: (This one also includes another variant on the left, which you should ignore.) real-scale .png: How will you use this to better interact with crew and/or stimulate RP? I will be using this to better interact with crew primarily as a discussion and roleplay "centerpiece" if you will. Sean Brianne uses his office quite regularly, and perhaps more than most Heads of Security. I would place it on my desk as a literal centerpiece, but also have it as a roleplay discussion starter. Sean Brianne's pride in his work and loyalty is already evident, and having such a piece would only allow him the opportunity for discussing his past, as well as the overall experience of Nanotrasen and the role security plays in the station. He may also choose to speak of it when meeting with individuals. Whether they be a misbehaving officer, expanding upon the duties required to achieve such an award, or to brighten and encourage an officer who is rising to the top, this item can be used for a number of conversations. Furthermore, this item can be used against Sean Brianne. Perhaps an antagonist may use it as leverage against him, or it may be added to exploitable information, and be an objective to be stolen, via the contract database. This item not only serves as a conversational piece, and target, but is functional. It may be used simply as its intended purpose- a teapot in which Sean may use it on outings, or even within his office. With an item of such importance to a character, it reflects its importance and character developing attributes to the crew and all who interact with Sean Brianne and this teapot. Additional comments: If you have any questions, suggestions, etc., please ask! Thanks for reading all of this. (.dmi file with teapot icon-state, etc. available on request. I also have a non-colored, non-NT branded teapot of similar shape, basically an alter of the original teapot available if anyone would like the model. Thanks!)

[mention]Garnascus[/mention][mention]TishinaStalker[/mention] I believe my whitelist app is ready to be reviewed at your availability, thanks!