AmoryBlaine

Competent, capable. I don't know Vaurca lore but I can support this.

Looks great, add it.

How about we don't try to make Expeditions into a Science exclusive thing. How about we not have all of Sec make new characters so they can play soldier boy. Why exactly would the NSS Aurora require third-party exterior security when a) we have the Icarus and b) A security team already present. Why would we make a role specifically for fucking around EVA and doing expeditions? What is the point of this other than to further limit security involvement outside patrols and dealing with antagonists, while complicating the antagonist-station dynamic for the worst?

Why not a modified vendor?

It's unrelated to the HoS' tactical shield. The ballistic shield shown here previously existed in our build, but was not used. I don't think it had a in-hand apeite either. So, this is something new essentially. The old tact shield sprite was fine IMO. So I won't change it.

I don't like the new ones, so I made updated versions of the old one. A ballistic shield made of metal, and a riot shield made of polycarbonate. Thoughts and questions go here.

Depends on where and what part of said faction. @kyres1 Has covered a good number of faction specific weapons, so maybe he could tell you better.

Could you elaborate as to why the standard uniform should be more intense? Why it should stand in contrast to all the faction specific suits that you can access as merc and why it shouldn't do it's best to blend in with anything.

They aren't suppose to pop. They're suppose to be bland, they're the standard mercenary uniforms. They don't fall under a specific faction.

The suits are yellow bronze and orange and brown with black chests. They've got helmet lights. If you cannot see them, it's more a you problem them a suit problem.

The only thing that gives a HoS an edge in authority is having his team back him. But if he does not have that, he has no power. If we're talking about 3D characters, you'll find a good chunk of Sec regulars are not automatons that will back up the HoS if they're trying to push against the rest of command. Sure, they have access to all the guns, but I'm really interested in hearing of some situations not regarding antagonism that result with a Head of Security grabbing guns to fight the rest of command that hasn't ended with bans and complaints. The suggestion that the HoS is this character to be feared because he can overpower the rest of command is only legitimatized by the size of the department he heads. No department, no power.

There's now a shorts alt for CTs and overalls alt for Miners.

"Well, see, we were going to capture the Merc, but since the others were still around and it was dangerous- we had to kill him- there just wasn't time to send him over to ISD- it was going to put our lives on the line to do that."

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck- it's a duck. Just because you stamp NOT A MILITARY FORCE on it, does not change the fact that this is designed to separate Security into two camps- the ones with the guns, and the ones without.

i217 - Illegal Blocking of Areas i211 - Sedition Those are your charges. Resisting arrest if you shoved any of them or tried to walk away. Being prodded is not harm- it's a stun weapon. You were stunned for committing at least two medium level infractions, specifically in protest of Command and refusing to come with Security. Should they try to slap cuffs on you first? Probably. This specific instance should have been backed up with logs in order to determine if their behavior was correct. Why wasn't this situation ahelp'd? If you feel that the security team was validhunting, you should have done so. See, this is why logs is better. Who said this? What was their rank? Were these actions being influenced by antagonism? If it was an Officer refusing to inform you your charges, it's really not their responsibility to have that information unless they processed you. They should get that info, though- but it's on whoever processed you to give it to you first and foremost. You got prodded for protesting and trying to block the bridge. We already have IC and OOC rules for poor conduct on the part of Security, you should have ahelped this specific instance that has prompted you to make this.

Behind this. Security specific mid-tier regulation for failure to do complete a callout, and/or failure to adhear to response directives. So, if you're rolling up to a scene after someone reports it and another officer has already verified on comms that they're responding, you can be reprimanded if the Command team and/or majority security team agree. Not that you will be every time, but that when you are, it's a kick in the pants- specifically the wallet, and maybe time in a cell or temporary suspension if it's a repeat issue, which would rope neglect of duty in as well so you could compound this new regulation and neglect of duty, then also file an IR. Just the looming threat of being fucked if you aren't properly coordinating and instead just sprinting to every situation like a validhound. Mind you, I have zero issue with Officers just checking situations out if it's in the main halls, but standing around when it's already been handled is just plain and simple not doing your job.

I could try, but my focus for now is on uniforms. RIGs and Voidsuits are a real bitch to sprite because there's so many sprite sides and versions for each race. Maybe @kyres1 would be interested in respriting the Industrial suit?

No round in specific, but yes, I have about the same experiences.

I was under the impression you already had one. I think that's enough to warrant support. You gave Watson to Rosetango?

Bumping this.

Any questions

Probably going to darken the browns. I think that shade of yellow is fine, though.

Did you have a different colour in mind?

Add this.