TheSleepyCatmom

And blood suddenly doesn't soak into a cloth that's on an open wound? :thinking:

Tajara take up a large portion of one of the districts of Mendel. It was even dubbed unofficially as 'Little Adhomai'. It makes a bit of sense. It also doesn't give a full understanding, only very minimally. Besides, this was a request. People didn't request other languages, it's unfair to go 'Well here's one lets wait for six others before making it a thing if it's a neat idea.'

It does, yes. EDIT: Using the Zhan language also lets you know a little bit of Siik, since it's an offshoot.

You'll fall asleep in about ten-fifteen seconds from Chloral at the latest. It's about double that for Sopo as far as I'm aware, without the near-insta incapacitation.

It works by taking a random word of the sentence, and making it Tau Ceti, and doing another random work, and making it Siik. As far as I'm aware, anyway. I've used it and seen it used, and that's how it seems to be.

That's fair, yeah. The progress bar would be cool, in the end. Make it interesting, and gives nonlethal CQC stuff for non-sec (Even if it does require a lot of other steps). It'd be good for people with Antag Force Gloves too.

I do actually really like this idea. But maybe we should make it a sleep-choke instead of a disarm-while-choking. Like if you use help/disarm or something (anything besides harm) to tighten the grab to the throat, you'll do a sleep-choke instead of actually choking. That'd be interesting, I think. It'd take longer, but wouldn't do much (if any) oxygen damage.

I doubly aggressive bump. Maybe it'll cause less 'lets blow APCs for the warzone effect'.

Going through the comments here, I can see the points raised. While, some of which I may not agree with entirely (Like the assumption that my being casual is my entire outlook on the situation, and that this was reflecting my determination or want to do something.), I can understand the concerns and in the future hope to remedy them. However, for the time being, I'll be taking this feedback to heart. There's certainly things I can improve on both in my play, and in my personality that don't mesh well with a lot of people. Simply because my outlook changed, doesn't mean I can immediately improve everything I do. I don't claim to be perfect now, nor would I want to be. I'm simply human. Beyond this, I do appreciate the feedback from all parties, and I don't take it as a personal assault towards me or my character if you were worried about that [mention]Elliot[/mention] . After all, the time I've been back (and made mistakes in), is hardly enough to prove much at all. And while some of you stating my change was for the worse, which did give me a moment to rethink, I like to believe it's more of a learning experience than anything else. I'm definitely overly casual, sarcastic, and at many points in time abrasive. As a side-note, I didn't apply for 'power' over the playerbase in any way. If this was the assumption that was gotten from my responses, I apologize, as this was in no way my intent. While I understand things CCIA are given while interacting with crew round-to-round, (As stated both the CCIAA position and the ERT Commander position.) it was never my intention to shoot for this things as a way to move myself above everyone else. Or, even then, abuse it to get a power trip of some kind. While, yes, my behavior regarding how I speak has caused issues in the past, I didn't at all see it as problematic during an interview. In my opinion, if I were attempting to be overly formal during it, it'd make me seem like someone trying too hard. I don't mean this in a negative way, I simply mean it as I wasn't attempting to appear as the perfect candidate. I'm not, and I don't believe I ever would be. But I don't disagree that it may have come off the wrong way, which was something I didn't think about at the time. At any rate, to wrap this all up, I did read the feedback given, and I was taking the time to collect my thoughts in such a way to respond before posting, so my apologies for the delays. I see the points and concerns raised, and will try to at least, attempt, to remedy the problematic parts. Hopefully in the future, as Elliot stated, I'd be in a more centered position to be able to do this. Until then, however, I think it'd be a good idea to close this regardless if the feedback was positive or not. It's been a learning experience, and one I'm glad I had.

I mentioned in my interview I disagreed with how things were policed, and I'm simply afraid this was one of those times. While I do think a week's a little severe, I won't argue the matter, and I understand if it deems me unfit for the position. However, without going into much further detail about the entire thing, as I stated before this isn't the place for it, I'll simply state that I did have a history of these actions before, and it's an understandable punishment. Furthermore, while I hope the application isn't closed due it it, I understand the reasoning if it is. As Paradox said, and as I agreed with earlier, questioning my behavior is part of the process. I wouldn't expect this not to have repercussions, as I wouldn't expect people to simply skim over it and it not matter. I learned from the matter that my Modus Operandi regarding something was wrong, and it was changed. All I can really ask for from the experience, in the end.

Well I like your answers! Most of them. But I don't quite think your test results would get swapped around so easily. :thinking: You've got a tentative +1 from me. We'll see how people react to your character.

your app name should usually go along the lines of '(CKEY) (Species) Application' as far as I remember. Besides this, I think it's... interesting... how you chose to write your character, but I don't think it I enjoy the thought of them getting onto the station. Vaurca are required to do tests to match the proficiency of others in their field, in which no Vaurca has ever failed. In fact I'm pretty sure each Vaurca has passed it with flying colors. But I have a few questions for you. How would the recent events with the Liidra affect your character? Do they know about them at all, have they been informed? Do they know what's happened to this station regarding the Liidra? How would they interact with the other Hives? Would they be open, or condescending? Would they see themselves as superior to some, inferior to others, so on. If this character is an architect, did you intend to put them in Engineering? While Engineering would be fine for an Architect on a planet, it's likely not the same thing due to the separate qualifications needed. Engineers in SS13 are hands on, Architects are draw-on-paper. How, specifically, do you plan to RP this character as negatively knowledgeable? Intelligence doesn't mean they can simply pick up how to build a wall instantaneously. Or seal a breach, or run atmospherics. Or, set the engine (as I've seen people learn to do at the snap of a finger.) And, of course, how would you say your character scored on the tests given? ((Also Vaurca are more akin to ants than they are Bees... are you sure you read the lorepage in it's entirety? :thinking:))

TFW Abo steals my post almost word for word while I'm typing it. Feelsbadman.

Yes, and these two events were the main issues. Which, were the only ones being addressed via your original complaint.

+1 much rawr give plz wondr who will get joke

Bauser, you can use wirecutters on a poster to get it back.

I lowered my aim at the time, simply giving up on the ahelp and continuing the round as to not keep everyone waiting for a while. While I didn't agree with a no interaction (Yes, no interaction at all) dominate on me, I went along with it. I'd let them go, they weren't being charged with anything, and they willingly to that point complied. They didn't question the other trooper's request whatsoever, if they did I'd have stepped in. We weren't arresting them, simply securing them as I'd stated we'd do at the start of our arrival. (I believe I stated we'd fire on them, thinking back, but that didn't seem quite fair anyway.) I was operating on the assumption that a dominate works until the command is complete. As I'd let them go then, I presumed the dominate was complete. End of command, I've seen security do this to vampires. A dominated officer/warden lets someone go due to a dominate, they don't argue at all when they're immediately re-detained. But moving from this point, I originally had intended to have all of security in cuffs due to Command stating they were all guilty when we arrived. I didn't see it as problematic, even if they were innocent, to temporarily detain them until moved to the Odin where it's more than just me, a trooper, and an Engineer who nearly broke his legs in an elevator. If my information there is wrong, I'm truly sorry. If it's warning or ban-worthy I won't argue it, I simply didn't realize it was so problematic at the time due to the situation. So while if I could go back and react differently I would, I'm unable to. Beyond this, the complaint itself wasn't entirely about this, and I'd also like your view on the other half of the complaint [mention]Garnascus[/mention] , which was my reaction to the Research Director.

Edit: I'm an idiot he said this I just can't read. Anyway +1, this Skrell eats all my food as a Chef. Do you have anything thatsh not meat and dough?

I don't ever necessarily get along with Burger. I don't necessarily enjoy what they code in some cases. But that doesn't mean they're not a competent coder, or someone I extremely dislike. I don't really have an issue with him being a Developer, so long as it doesn't simply allow them to pass things into the game without a moderated portion somewhere to double check it. Which, I think that's the case with Github that it's all checked before implementation anyway, so I'm all for it.

Regarding my administrative actions, I did speak about this. I won't go into detail about the complaint here, as this isn't the place for it. However, doubts are part of the process. If you didn't doubt and took my word for truth immediately, it'd make me more question whether this was a place I'd put my time. Erring on the side of caution is good, it gives me something to prove myself rather than to take my words at face value. While yes, CCIA function as a 'customer service', always smile and make sure to keep in mind the person you're talking to. I never said, though, that they weren't critical to the server. They're equally as critical as they are ICly. Yet, I'm not always the best with my phrasing. (I even mentioned how this landed me in a little bit of heat on Polaris, a little bit ago.) My motivation can't be proven with words, nor would I expect it to be. If I simply stated that they're critical like I just did with nothing further, I'd be accused of telling you what you want to hear. While I don't view the role as a major staff role, I do believe it's relevant to how the server runs. Equally as relevant, if not moreso, than the playerbase itself. Without them, there'd be no server, no? My willingness can only be proven through action, at least in my opinion. Isn't that the point of Trials? While yes, I went inactive, that's because I was both dealing with work and hopping to and from other servers trying to find if I liked somewhere more than another. While I didn't try too much, I don't actually enjoy most of the reviews I hear about most of the places, so I skipped them entirely. But before I derail the topic, I'm going to say that I returned because I enjoyed the time here. While I enjoyed it in another way than I do now, I enjoy it equally as much if not moreso now. But either way, I can't determine determination off of talking to myself. I'm the kind of person who both learns through action, and thrives on the experience. Time will only tell, if it's accepted.

These things were purposely left out of the log, because they weren't relevant to Yugo. However, they're entirely relevant. I didn't simply kill them after them glaring at me. They purposely made it seem like I immediately got up and shot them, which wasn't the case. Not in the slightest.

If my own perspective on how I act in a round isn't good enough, what is? Am I meant to act entirely in a way that's acceptable to you? I was unfair to Amory in allowing a frag grenade to go off on him in crit, and he couldn't do anything about it. I contacted and apologized for it. I wasn't specific with it, but we moved on at least. Or at least I think so. Beyond this, moving back to your comment, I did misread. And I do have logs to prove he didn't say 'We have her again'. I got this from Coalf, who says there's absolutely nothing past 'tried to escape'. I read over it, while interacting with Yugo. Which, yes, caused me to be hasty in reading it, I read 'she tried and escaped.'. I do apologize for that, I wasn't intending to have to multitask a prisoner and what I was doing via the Troopers. It's the reason I didn't specifically go L/Tpr. I didn't /want/ to be in command, just noone else was. So yes, this is entirely my fault for giving the order. My misunderstanding here. However, Here's something for Drago. They then went down the ladder and blocked us, so I used the catwalk to go down and began this, aiming as I say it. However, disregarding my directive, while aimed at, she begins moving once more and gets shot. They then stand there, silently, waiting for an ahelp in hulked out mode. During this time, nothing happens and we sit silently. Until I speak with Trekker, who went to attempt to cuff them, and instead they run, getting them shot more as I was in aim mode still on their person. I ran out of ammunition, reloaded, and see they ran into the main hallway. So I begin firing down the main hallway, in turn killing them. You seeing them in cuffs happened after they were dead, as when they fell over the Engineer cuffed them. After screaming more, mostly due to the shrapnel of all the bullets I believe (as I have shot them several times, might be the pain too.) This begins them running away, to the cryodorms on the main level where they go into the hallway.

I didn't get the message of 'I have them again' in my chat. If I did, I wouldn't have ordered it. The issue comes with, even if it's there, it doesn't always appear for certain people. I have this problem, and I'm fairly certain everyone does at times. If it did come through, which I'm 95% sure it didn't, I do apologize. Yes, that's on me. But my argument is hinged from my point of view. My defense of myself is based entirely on what I saw and didn't see. I can't tell you any more honestly than that. We brought ballistics because we were told, very specifically, the HOS and security were attempting to murder the captain. That's how it went down, and that's how we prepared. Being as though the Captain is someone /critically/ important, I believed it justified. We had nonlethal (at least, I did) weapons, but based on the actions taken when we arrived I kept my Egun on lethal.

I wasn't told this, Shev. I was only told you'd escaped. My order was presumed you were out of cuffs and gone, as in poof. We watched Carmichael do this before when we shot at him. We didn't know if you could or not, and that proved it to me that you could, hence my order. I didn't know you were, at any point, detained again. I'm not saying ignorance is a reason to completely excuse it, but how was I supposed to know if I wasn't told? You complied with the other trooper. If you were innocent, what do you have to lose by complying? Absolutely nothing. That's exactly how I saw it. That's exactly how Security deals with it. 'If you're innocent, lets prove it. You've nothing to lose by complying in that case.' You're only making matters worse by resisting and adding a charge. Even if the first one is illegitimate. That's how the law works, you know. I don't see that as skirting around the dominate command. I had absolutely no frag grenades on me. I didn't know he took the entire box. I *Only knew* he had a single grenade in his underslung. That's it. You can argue this all you like, but I'm physically unable to tell you I knew about it when I didn't. frag grenades was overkill because it's much easier to catch people in the crossfire, I thought it was a last resort and only a single grenade. I didn't even have my underslung loaded.

Secondary post; regarding 'executed on the ground'. This isn't true. I was firing a three-round-burst rifle at you while you were running away. You wouldn't have been on the ground until you died, as you were hulked from lack of blood. Furthermore, that's not the entire post. If you're going to include logs, instead of starting where I fired, why don't you start at where I began aiming at you and the posts regarding you? That's not fair to me, or the other people involved where you purposely attempt to maneuver it in your own favor.