Alberyk

I will look into this.

I guess not then. Appeal denied.

Sorry for taking this long, it was a lot to read and investigate, and life got on the way. Now, there are two points which we must address here; First, the cyborgification and the revolt part. We believe that the concret threat of cyborgification was enough to allow people to act against command staff and their new security force. The rules are clear on this, you can do start conflict as long there is enough escalation and reason, and we believe that this is the case. The main theme of the revolution round, as the name say, is to cause some kind of revolt, and not only antags should be able to do this. So, we believe that garn is wrong in this aspect. However, we also noticed another issue. From what we could gather, you were doing your best to attempt to poke holes in their story, even if they had an announcement at some point; It is not really unbelievable that NanoTrasen may make use of third parties as security. They do right now with contractors, or mercenary teams answering as ert, or even during that week event where we had most of security being replaced with eridani forces. This pretty much falls in line with the guy suggesting that the AI is subverted somehow, and when taking in consideration that people have little to no reason to don't trust central command announcements, since their subvertion is reserved to antag interactions. We do believe that you were acting in bad faith, taking in consideration your notes, by trying to find any excuse to just bust the supossed mercenary team. A delay in communications is not really that unfeasable, taking also in consideration the situation setup by the antag's gimmicks. As result of this, we are rewording the ban reason to don't include the attack and the borging, but your overall behavior towards the team as explained above. I will also have a talk with all the team about the revolution case and possible motivations for conflict as a non antag. The ban reason will be changed to this:

You can remove yourself from cryo by right clicking it when you are inside the cryo pod.

This is pretty great and it is a big improvement from what we have.

Your answers are satisfactory and you have good feedback. Application accepted.

While the backstory is kinda short, I believe it display enough knowledge about the lore. But I have some questions. How old is this character? What job are they working on station? What degree are they after in human space? How does he sees the war and the other two tajaran faction?

That is a thing already. It is a feature that engineering, by messing with the ries, or the AI can toggle.

You can remove that, unlike the loadout system name change.

Pr for it https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/7436

Trial passed.

They only had non human sprites due to species restrictions on rigs that do not exist anymore, it could be easily made human only.

I also believe that this should be a rule for somewhat the same reasons that the initial post has described. It is kinda immersion breaking, and gets worse when it comes to stuff like ninja and wizards.

I am going to make this clear before someone tries to abuse this screenshoot. There is no such thing as gank policy, I have spoken with prate about this. The rules explain; you need a reason to kill someone, even as antag. And in the case that a security officer is going to bust you for something that will just get you locked behind cells, yes it is fine. In the same way it is fine for an officer to use lethal force against someone going at them with a energy sword. The only guidelines in this case are going to be the rules. Prate just poorly worded this, so, the rules are going to be used here, not some unwritten policy. Admins and moderators should apply the rules to each situation.

I will look into it.

https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/7351

https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/7353

Trial starting today until 13/11.

Bay removed it. Also, mutiny was bad. It was like rev, but with a limited choice of background stories, that needed a captain and another head of staff. It also had objectives, which was something we kinda removed years ago. My experiences with it were rarely positive. Most of the time, it was a rush to see who could recruit security first to arrest the captain or obey the directive. Few times the crew would get involved, with most of the stuff happening between command staff and some officers. I am really against us trying it again.

I am the headmin, I am literally one of the heads of the administrator team, of course I can decide this stuff. You have been permabanned three times, you have wasted all of our chances. That is why I am against unbanning you. If anything, drago did not understand or there was misscommunication error here. Now, I guess this is the best time to ask you to read this: https://forum.ss13.co/showthread.php?tid=5175&pid=60279#pid60279 I also believe that this complaint is already solved.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_vult On the top of that; you need a first and second name, you had three. Do you understand how is this breaking the server rules or not?

You have around seven notes just about the name rule. Coupled with other stuff. The name rule is the following: Being named deus vult moris is an obvious reference/joke, on the top of being three names in theory. So, taking in consideration that you either do not understand or care to follow the rules, why should I give you a another chance after two permabans here?

This is a really hard decision for me. But, I will have to decline your application due to the team being full. I am not really sure on adding a new subgroup of tajara, at least not for now, as I plan to focus more on developing our factions. But, in the case I do, I will contact you about this. Thank you for applying.

This is a really hard decision for me. But, I will have to decline your application due to the team being full. But, I can still add what you wrote to the wiki and lore if you want, and I am also open if you want to contribute or give me feedback. Thank you for applying.

This is a really hard decision for me. But, I will have to decline your application due to the team being full. Like I have told you, I appreciate your contributions, and I will also work to add what you wrote to the wiki and lore. Thank you for applying.