Alberyk

There are already enough effects related to brain damage, such as pain messages, falling down and more. A hud element is clearly not needed. Voting for dismissal.

The brand and the rest if fluff information can already be found in the description, where they do belong, there is no real reason to clutter the weapon's names when said function already exist. Voting for dismissal.

I will get you a last chance, take in mind that any similar behavior will end in a permaban under the conditions already explained. Appeal Accepted.

Custom items can be locked behind the job of the character.

Accepted.

As I said, I am pretty sure that the person that found the room was using mesons, and did notice the titles being added as you said, which is an indication that someone was inside the room before and coupled with the airlocks being locked down, and since it was one of the room in the maintenance, I did not see any issue with the case. However, if other admin find my reasoning faulty, I will speak to the individual in question about this behavior.

Alright, so, please describe me what is the main issue of the behavior that caused you to be banned and how do you plan to correct and avoid it?

No, we don't need to discourage writing and reading in a roleplay ambient. Voting for dismissal.

This is your second ban, you got a lot of notes and warning during a really short stay, if I am to lift this, it will be your last chance, do you understand this?

I will give you one last chance, even if you have a lot of notes, warnings and bans. Read the server rules and take in mind that more of this behavior will result in another ban. Appeal accepted.

IJ is one of the most interesting roleplayers to interact with, I had good experiences with Senri Ishikawa and Damian del Prado mostly. I believe he could roleplay a tajara without any issues, speaking as someone that did help him with the backstory and character's concept. +1, it has my support.

There was two merchants at the time, which seems security did take little time to investigate who was selling weapons to the crew. And I did not take being an antag in consideration because you did not explain, neither it did show, that arresting the merchant was related to any agenda that the loyalists were trying to push at the time, and as I said, lack of communication and the decision being rushed as the hos was one of the main issues here as well. Also, the warning was also motivated due to your past notes related to being a head of staff.

Except the arrest of the merchant happened, and it caused a clusterfuck at the time. Besides, the merchant is indeed allowed to sell whatever they can into their ship, which you could have just sent a message to central command if you saw any issue. And the directives were really clear about this, you can't arrest the merchant for having the crew, you could have arrested the people buying it or just sent a cc message and we could have recalled/handle the merchant doing it. The directives we put in place were pretty much set to avoid this kind of thing, and it seems there was a confusion between the first and the second merchant that also contributed to the arrest, that is why the little investigation part was also added. And I am sure it is a regular warning, not a major one.

There was clear signs that someone modified that area of maintenance, and since found that the airlocks would not open, I see no issues with them trying to look for other entrances. If the officer was running around the maintenance by touching all doors because something might have been there, that would be an issue. Now, I was wrong about the mesons, because, if I am not wrong, the tajaran offier had them at the time. Now, the AI reported you moving to that area. I did investigate further by talking to the player that found the place in question, I was pretty much alone at the time mod-wise, and since I work at home, I had to leave for a moment to deal with something. As I said in dms, if you told me they said that in looc, I would probably look into it more at the time, which you only did far later, it is impossible to staff to see everything at once or take in consideration everything. Later the player told me that he was looking for other entrances, which I do believe that is a fine case in this situation where they could believe there was suspect in a place they can't reach, that they could clearly in regular conditions. Anyway, I doubt that fake walls, mostly to security, would be some sort of hidden knowledge, like some antags tools are, and it is fine for them to take such in consideration.

I will give you another chance, but take in mind you have a lot of notes, warnings and even bans for validhunting behavior. Any more of this might end being punished in the same manner. Appeal Accepted.

Merchants were supossed to be something rare, that would not happen every round, in the same vein of the cargo warehouse, making them a regular job that will happens all the time will defeat most of the planning related to the role. RNG itself is not bad because it adds variety to those cases. +1 dismissal

Did you not change/transfer/retconn him to the research department, [mention]stickydragon[/mention] ?

Okay, I have missed the comment in the screenshoot and I applied a strike due to it. Still, you kept as well carrying on with the discussion on the matter even after being told to stop, two wrongs does not equal a right.

There are maglights on the tables, and spare headsets on the lockers. if you need more things, get to cargo or somewhere else to print. +1 dismissal

No, we already have secret, and I see no point in a gamemode that does the same thing, with the only differences being a high chance of extended and less antags options. +1 dismissal.

This is something you should ahelp about. And no, people lobby sitting or ghosting should not be kicked, they are free to stay around without issues. +1 dismissal

Application accepted.

What... reasons? This seems to mostly be people having ideas on how to work this, not saying we shouldn't do it. I don't understand what 'stated reason' you're offering for dismissing this.

Mostly an ic issue. But if any loadout restriction is being put on the jobs, it would not be only for security.

+1 dismissal due to the reasons already stated.