Garnascus

Yeah i mean that all sounds pretty reasonable to me. I guess i can do a vote from now on for highlander?

Fair enough. As the staff member in question has retired i will handle this. Your ban is lifted. Please read the rules upon logging into the server and feel free to ahelp about any and all questions you might have.

Yeah, sounds fair to me. I will expunge the ban from your record.

Give me a day or two to get @Shadow7889 to provide their context here. I do have to say though that if you need to deal with any player in the capacity of staff you PM them. Full stop. A player cannot and is not expected to recognize you from LOOC.

We are allowed to admin-bus at round end. I haven't done a highlander thing in a while so i figured it would be fun. I am slightly empathetic to it interrupting you during your round end RP but it does not change my opinion of "we might do some silly things at round end". Turning everyone into a highlander is pretty rarely done.

you need to provide a brief description of the event. Its a little hard to piece together what happened from your remarks. also for the love of god relax with your tone. You're way more likely to get a desirable outcome if you dont rage at us.

obviously i know this.....

Solo interaction is not a bad thing. Neither is "chairrp". Its just role play you personally do not like. Embracing off the bat could probably work. I do not see too many players willing to roll with suddenly becoming a vampire. A lot of you nerds purposefully resist cult conversions to death as it is. Make thralling a cheaper power and unlocked earlier imo.

Vampire is easily the most well designed and interesting mode we currently have. You have the tools and incentives to create conflict and RP without killing people. Right now it is definitely very difficult and time consuming to create another vampire. You need at least two people. One person to become the vampire and then another person to have their blood sucked by the new vampire. I do not know if i fully understand your suggestion. If you want people to become a vampire just from being bitten and regardless of the volume of blood sucked i think that will ruin the mode. You're not slaved or allied to whoever turns you into a vampire. You're creating a potential enemy for.... what gain exactly? Why would i do this?

alright, appeal accepted. Please read the rules and do not multi-key again.

sure Dont post bad memes anymore Ban lifted

locking and archiving.

What kind of health concerns disallow them from being these command positions but still allow them to be security? Looks cool to me though.

I actually think the collateral damage part is the best part of it. It makes them a lot harder to use effectively than a simple flash bang. Tossing em out willy nilly is a good way to get bwoinked. Though i can definitely see the issue where both a heavily armed merc team and an ERT team start lobbing grenades at each other. Dunno how big of an issue it is or is not since i never see merc rounds anymore. Traitors having access to cheap frags is fine imo. The rules already cover general abuse of them and i feel egregious situations are way too niche to warrant nerfing the availability of frags for traitors.

Confirmed. People have been antag banned for this. Good guide. Thank you delta! Very cool!

I will not lie, no you do not. Listen i am gonna unban you. If you want to make a complaint over the original issue i can look into it. @Dathouse

Then i have nothing further to say to you. I conceded it was a bad move and that delta probably broke it first.

Its a little annoying to be accused of not caring about your problems and playing video games instead of looking into them. If all of that is true what do you hope to get out of this complaint? Its impossible for me to respond to an OP who already has his mind made up. I will just state a few things. 1. I will never make a "deal" like that again. Or at least communicate it better. All it did was create confusing PMs from people "hey garn does this break your deal". Bad move. Would not do again. 2. I probably should have banned delta in the past. 3. I strongly dislike engaging with both of you. You're both fine human beings. When its all problems that a specific person brings me i just end up associating them as the problem. I dunno what else to say. I did not and still do not think either of you where the innocent party in both of your original complaints. It is not, hasnt been and never will be my job to make two or more people get along. if i could go back in time i would probably have banned the both of you instead of that "deal".

Will you do that again if i unban you?

So like, do you have anything to say about spamming our discord and ahelps?

I dunno, i dont remember. The only thing i do remember is why i banned you. I banned you for being a weeny. That is all.

Sorry dude, appeal denied. I do not generally unban ban evaders.

REMOVE THEM Only malf should be able to deploy them. they are too fast. too powerful.

So if you successfully evaded the ban why are you just now appealing it? Why should i unban someone who ban evaded?

So, before i give a verdict on this have you attempted to evade the original ban i set at all?