Jump to content

Faris

Members
  • Posts

    1,480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Faris

  1. I'll quote a few things from the rules. While I don't expect full memorization, some of the core concepts should have dawned on you by now, because I still believe this ban was justified. We don't really do other temporary bans durations. You were the second case, and I'll explain why. You have 36 staff entries, I'll say around 32 only really matter. Your first note was on the 27th of march, which happens to be your first day on the server, which is fine so far, people make mistakes. The primary issue with you is the continuous and repeated issues. I'll post a few. You received this note the 31st of March, this was your eight note so far, this shows up to this time you haven't paid much mind to the rules. This is entry number 12, a ban. Reviewing all this, the staff have been highly forgiving and receptive of you, with all these issues. Entry 15. Entry 17. You did something I told you to strictly not do, and even then we were forgiving. I could've left the ban permanent, but with Matt, I let it downgrade. Entry 20. I'm going to jump ahead now and quote the ones directly linked to my decision. And even with all this, I gave you another chance, not even your first. You've played vampire enough so you knew well enough. I still gave you a chance since I perceived this as improvement. Then you do the following. If I'll be blunt, it feels the chances I've given you were gone to waste, the same thing on and on. You have deliberately and intentionally went against what we've told you, you're not only guilty of breaking the rules and what we've told you not to do, you're also guilty of wasting the trust and effort we've put to cultivate your experience here. Had there been no chances, you'd have been banned back in May most likely. I am not accepting this appeal and won't permit any new appeals until the 1st of November. Any new appeals before then will be denied and result in your date pushed later. If you want to contest this, file a staff complaint.
  2. Didn't you handle this? [mention]Yonnimer[/mention]
  3. Bygone doesn't literally mean that the Lii'dra will be able to mechanically function like ghosts. He means that the channel would be a mixture of OOC and IC. I would probably say it's more like an in-character AOOC. Yeah, that's fine. We already have a language which is barely used that could function as such for Lii'dra or any other themes. Might just need a rename. I don't have the full name on hand.
  4. I'm handling this along with the CCIA Liaisons, Doc and Shame.
  5. Yes, but doesn't that permit people to see the map? Why not just give them one of our existing languages? We have one dark comms one, don't have the entire name, which could be renamed and used not just for this, but other avenues.
  6. This sat for a while and I've observed the rounds since then. I've seen more people request permission to delaminate the engine and get it approved than those that sabotaged communications without permission. Anything extremely spamming and annoying that is not supportive of a high-roleplay environment is interfered with. Seconding Garns dismissal. Locking and archiving.
  7. No issues pointed. Archiving this as accepted and implemented.
  8. Putting my seal of approval on this as well.
  9. Voting for dismissal. There are IC considerations already in place for this. Cloning is not a right for anyone, it's a privilege, which may or may not be granted depending on the circumstances at the time. Certain medical staff per the following linked policy, can handle some post cloning issues. https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?f=125&p=102386#p102386
  10. I like the idea, but I'm curious on how you want it to work? Like implementation and usage?
  11. There's no actual suggestion here, but rather a task. What do you propose?
  12. Just posting to say I'm handling this.
  13. I'll be handling this complaint as I'm oversight for the command whitelist team.
  14. I fixed your format.
  15. The player in question is permabanned now, so it won't add much if we keep it up. Locking and archiving.
  16. Locking and archiving.
  17. He didn't. He's mentioned exhaustion from the day, so hopefully a response tomorrow.
  18. Banned from Head of Security, Warden, Detective, Forensic Technician, Security Officer, Security Cadet - Employed more than permitted force on a hulked vampire, shooting at them lethally without any attempts to stun/detain. Excessive shooting also resulted in the venting of the brig. Per your previous entries, this is a clear case of you valid hunting and not thinking things appropriately. This is a permanent security department job ban, which you may appeal no date before 27/07. I had a look at your WI and these are the rounds you've played this month with present characters. Now, I do realize you played a few rounds the month before, the few days after the ban I applied, but that since you couldn't play security, your activity dropped down to these 3 rounds in the last 27 days. In addition to the fact you have 34 staff entries, 32 of them negative, practically every issue being a repeat. If I'll even be more specific, you have 6 warnings and 5 different bans. You don't have a large enough sample size for me to judge you to be suitable for an unban. I'm going to deny this, you can appeal tomorrow or a year from now, me accepting an appeal is dependent on whether you are able to abide with the rules and cause no issues while playing other jobs. Do note you actually even gained a negative staff entry after the ban itself. Appeal denied. Leaving this open for another 24 hours.
  19. Gave this two days. Locking and archiving.
  20. I'd need to dive into the food wiki to give a full answer, so maybe later. Generally when I played a cook, and if they were doing specific cuisines, I'd describe it by word, emote or menu, to give it that authentic style that players may understand.
  21. A post to confirm that I am personally tracking, as will Garn and Skull once they're aware of the issue. I hope people remain civil when writing their post and adhere to the forum rules.
  22. I've been reviewing for for the last day, even before my post. To summarize, I'm not fond of the idea of giving you a third chance at this time. And full disclosure, telling us about your time with Bay has helped, since we already look into this sort of thing, so neglecting to mention it, especially had we asked would have made it much worse. However, it was not enough. The issue with your time on the server, is that across a period of 5 months, you've received 23 staff entries, all in the negative. 7 of the 23 are warnings, 2 of which I personally gave you 2 days apart, the second not a ban, but a warning because I spoke to you and believed you had sincere intentions to reform in accordance to our rules. The truth of the matter, we have been extremely lenient with you and it has not paid off. While we don't regret for our lenience, it's not something I am willing to grant you once more. No. In order of most recent to oldest. Again, we have been extremely lenient with you, but there are limits. It is my opinion that unbaning you would yield us no benefit and there is very little chance of you improving. You'd be surprised with the mixed results we get. You had your chance the first time we unbanned you, you're not getting the second unban removed for a much longer while, if ever. Try again in 2019, if that's still denied, then you're most likely not being given another chance. Leaving this open for 24 hours unless something is added.
  23. Writing to say I'm taking this complaint.
  24. Not handling your appeal, but I agree with Yugo/Drak. You don't presently deserve nor are entitled to have this ban lifted at time time. Spend a while playing a regular character to show you understand how the server works. You've already acquired 2 staff entries since the ban was applied.
×
×
  • Create New...