sonicgotnuked

Honestly, from what I have been witnessing and I mentioned to them, I will have to give them a -1. They simply show a little too much metagaming and valid hunting behavior while playing as Sara. They seem understanding to it, but I honestly wish for them to have more time playing security and improving their play before they make another head of staff whitelist.

Game ID for this round is bQU-aFDm Alright, first of all the short story is, I am not unbanning you for your blatant lying that is easily able to be logged and proven against. Red and green text is not enough proof. First of all, you came on as a stereotypical black person and these are the events I witnessed in order. You went up to chemistry with something along the lines of where is my watermelon (In a black accented tone) You went down to hydroponics and entered through the broken window to I assume you growing water melons. (He didn't) You went up to the chef and ordered him to grow you water melons, then proceeded to call him a "disrespecfal cracker" (something along those lines) while emoting you smacking your lips. You went down to the bar and got alcohol, chugged it, then went back to the chef and threw the cup at him before calling him a cracker. I decided to step in and talk to you, as you are obviously very new to the server. You went up to an officer without a word and took their ID while I was talking to you. Back and forward running around. I winded you to talk to you. I was only going to give you a talk, place a note on you (standard for verbal warnings) and unwind. I told you to tone down the black stereotype and read the rules (that you admitted to not have took a look at) Yes I made one little mistake but I have told you it was my bad while I tried to act like a respectful person towards you. I told you I was going to place a temporary server ban when you said this while even telling you I don't want to permanently ban you. Do you think I should continue to be reasonable with you and try to allow you to learn a new environment? I want to help players, I don't like banning them but it needs to be done at times and this is when I contacted prat to place a permanent ban on you. Then you decided to continue. And your last one gave me a good laugh, thank you for that. Don't lie dude, really- honestly, it is easily found out and it does not make you look good.

Alright, I posted that quickly and I am sorry about that. Keep in mind that everyone has their own opinions on this and I will respond to your points with my opinions. The only department that would become an issue that comes in mind is medical and I haven't really seen any mice on shoulders or issues with that. It would fall under the CMOs authority. If someone does throw a massive tantrum over a mouse that no sain person will act in that way, I highly suggest you ahelp them and it would end up a OOC issue and staff will talk to them. It depends on the intent and actions they take. I don't find a problem if they argue about it and call the head of staff lame behind their backs but if they are completely ignoring orders and/or neglecting their job duty (as medical especially) when they are not an antag. I understand the pains of dealing with a dude sometimes but if it turns repetitive, then make a player complaint or ahelp. The actions of a few should not ruin the entire thing.

Why is there more threads about mice. Why, why.... why This is like the thread with people wearing skrell hard suits. Who cares if someone wears a mouse on their shoulder. If they cause any issues that are against the rules or the mouse is spamming the squeak verbs, ahelp. IC issue, it honestly is just a IC issue.

The ban was applied on game ID bQD-aTYD and the game ID for his warning and supposed actions was bQd-au2A if someone wishes to database swim. I am 90 percent sure Nursie notified the OP about their ban before placing it.

To be clear, here is the rule the OP broke when they continued to argue with staff about their warning after the server REBOOTED, I was a witness to that. Nursie applied the tempary ban over the OPs continued argument over the warning with the Trial Mod TheDocOct. Secondly, I was the malfunctioning AI during that round and I have not witnessed the fight at all and I turned off my attack logs to cut me off as much as possible from meta information that comes with staff permissions.

Honestly, I don't think this is a good idea. We don't need mechanics to force people to roleplay.

Oh boy, people getting pissy about local engineering wearing skrell hard suits. I mean, I have zero clue why people care so much about it, like come on... Just ignore the snowflakes.

I seen them do well, they have my +1 Side note... GMOD... why does everyone (including me) end up coming from gmod...

This is a simple thing involving the thermal drill. I think the damage it gives is fine... but it auto aims at the target. Its bypasses the point of you being bolted down and stun locked while you can't move the beam. Please remove the auto aim because it can kill people so easily it isn't even funny.

I honestly am highly against this. It will limit Roleplay and a "screaming nearby" will cause people to investigate. Sometimes as an antag you want your victims to speak to you while you murder them.

Per sharps announcement, I wish to continue.

Now what happens when your local AI breaks and goes a little nutty? It 9/10 goes secret mode while spending most of its time hacking APCs for an hour and a half. I will split this in two- MALF and Traitor. Yes the updates made with synthetic domination for the fourth tree and hacking IPCs and APCs not going blue right when hacked is useful. But it is still not really enough sadly from what I feel. MALFUNCTIONING AI! Oh how much everyone loves this term, your local station AI going a little nutty and then valid hunted when it spends most of its time hacking APCs to actually do the cool things in life that every malfunctioning AI loves to do. Those APCs add up when each takes a minute to hack so I will give some suggestions to what should be added or changed. Make a auto hacker verb.- This in general would be nice to cut the level of micro managing you need to do. It will randomly pick an APC to hack, hack it, then pick a new APC straight when it is open or when enough CPU has built up. Can be toggled on or off, and no one has the right to complain about their lack of CPU because of it. Add the ability for malfunctioning AI to remove its borgs from the cameras and console- And mappers once said, "Let us add three robotics consoles for easy blowing the borgs and rendering a malfunctioning AI without a way to physically interact with things." Like this is a thing that forces malfunctioning AIs to stealth 90 percent of the time. Do you think that is fun for the AI when the borgs blow apart? They already have to deal with the second AI bug that binds half the borgs to the AI that soon gets deleted while begging robotics to link them. I would wish for a research that an AI can get to unlink borgs one at a time with a CPU cost and minute time to remove its units from the console. RnD 9/10 is active and able to make more consoles, there is a spare board inside tech storage, and there is three consoles on the map. TRAITOR AI Now this AI has other antags backing it up and that is fine. It shouldn't unlink borgs from the console completely. I don't think much change is needed for the AI itself when it is rouge. TRAITOR BORG Oh the most powerless traitor with one wrong move causing it to have a console blowing it up. Don't you love baymeme removing the ability for the borg to click a magical verb called, "Scramble Identification Codes"? I do miss this verb and the ability for the borg to hack itself while unlinking from the console. Please, please, please add it back and it will not make traitor borgs useless against a station full of guns with THREE robotic consoles able to instantly blow it in one click of a button from anywhere.

I agree with hive, security is getting a massive trend. Now, that can be understood because new people and all. Now if the HoS does this, they need to be slapped hard.

Mark Syion gives a few snow-flaky- power game red flags to me but I think cool is improving with defining his character less CEO of his company mary sue style to something more mellow. He shows improvement in my eyes. Powergaming is a strong thing I look for when someone applies to IPC, but I am sure your level of being open to feedback will help that. Now, the application itself: LOADER is an interesting concept, it is acceptable and it didn't give me red flags. That works, just don't make a literal metal human with full blown emotions or another HELPER... I am having flashbacks IPCs don't really need to be slow learning and fully mechanical. Just think, "I act out that I have emotions but those emotions just hide my true scrap self" IPCs are decently much fast learners, learning off the crew with every little interaction while asking what a penis is. You have the freedom to tune the level of 'acting human' towards it as long as it does not have full blown emotions. You have a mild +1 from me as long as you don't power game the species to death. Lastly, I agree

Goodbye cloud! I'll miss you. Good luck in the real world.

He did pretty well when I decided to choose him instead of Lukas as the interim HoS. You have my +1 my dude.

The only problem I have with this is some chaplains will litterly rush you as a cultest and spam the null rod so cult should have a choice of yes or no. If the de-conversion works, the cultest will have a chance for a fucking limb to pop off their body some how. That and the slapping should be removed.

What? Am I hearing we should restrict antags from you know... Being antags? I enjoyed their loyalist rounds. A loyalist captain can litterly be Hitler killing xenos on the station. Just because you are loyalist does not mean you have to follow NT orders perfectly. If the captain and HoS is a loose end, then they have the full power to try and remove them. If people are punished for this, this would make Rev rounds be more extended.

I am sorry, I got the massive urge to post this video right here after I saw what Biabri posted. Joking aside, cussing people out is extremely inmuture thing to handle situations. If you did this when you screwed up on a job, you would be fired in a heartbeat.

HI! I was the Head of Security that round, let us delve into the depths of this player complaint. And yes, I would like the IR I made dropped in favor of the complaint after reading on this OOC complaint. Really nice thing to read, shows your passive aggressive behavior towards criticism that we all see when you got your medical ban that is outlined inside this complaint! https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=8868&start=10 It is sadly not the case, surprising you will say this when there is plenty of evidence and record of your behavior. No no, that wasn't want the warrant was about. The warrant was about your argumentative nature that the captain told me to arrest you for and stating that you where told to stop. Keep in mind: I was just going to say, I find this really hilarious when the warrant came up and you told me that if I tried to cuff you, you would arrest me for battery. Your boss mind you, why would NT hire a character who threatens to arrest their boss for doing their job? I tried to cuff you and I told you to stand down, you pulled out your stun stick and people rushed in. You then proceeded to take the problem into LOOC. I am questioning your ability to keep LOOC and OOC out of each other. He did, he really did and he was the one who told me. The player in questioning does not seem to be able to handle criticism for their actions well. Yes, I was going to keep this IC but then I learned this is repetitive.

Reporting Personnel: Ekasoz Aele Rank of Reporting Personnel: Head Of Security Game ID: bQi-cHDw Personnel Involved: (Name, Rank: Offender/Witness/Other (Ckey)) - Sabbia Fiore - Security Officer (Offender) - Izkal'sil Zaoh - Security Cadet (Witness) - Vincent LeChiffre - Captain (Witness) ((UnknownMurderer)) Time of Incident: bQi-cHDw Real time: 9/4/17 Location of Incident: Departures Nature of Incident: []Workplace Hazard []Accident/Injury []Destruction of Property []Neglect of Duty []Harassment []Assault []Misconduct [X]Other Failure to Execute an order, Assault on a head of staff, resisting arrest. Overview of the Incident: Ms. Sabbia the entire shift shown to be defiant on simple orders from me and the captain. Close to the end of the shift while the Crew Transfer Shuttle was coming to the station, I had to tell her multiple times to bring the Laser Rifle back to the armory that was issued for the suspect of spiders and a few space carp around the station that I could easily take out with my laser pistol fully charged. That is when the captain Vincent LeChiffre told me that he has ordered her to stop being defiant towards chain of command and ordered her arrest for Failure to Execute an order. I told her to immediately bring the rifle back and it took her five minutes with defiance over security communications until she finally brought it back. I wished to secure the guns before leaving as I didn't wish to miss the crew transfer. Before I left the brig, I have placed a warrant up for her arrest then detain at Departures where she was currently. I went up to her and showed her the warrant and told her to allow me to place cuffs on her person. She then proceeded to grow hostile towards that idea, telling me she will arrest me for battery and the captain has no authorization for arrests. I have warned her multiple times, but it was futile while she turned to the rest of the crew and asked, "Who thinks I shouldn't be arrested?" I then proceed to attempt to cuff her. She pulled out her baton and stunned me to the ground, causing me to pass out. When I awoke, I saw the other officers and the captain have put her to the floor and I witnessed through my blurry vision the cuffs being slapped on her wrists. When I told the cadet this is why I teach him the experience of the non-lethal weapons being used, That was the reason why. She then proceeded to call me a 'wus' inside security communication channels while inside the shuttle prisoner holding. [/hr]Did you report it to a Head of Department or IAA? If so, who?: N/A Actions taken: Was detained and brought to Odin. Additional notes:

Honestly, I think this was more of a IC issue for Jones. The comms thing can be IRed. I was never really part of the piano side but I started the comms thing by doing something along the lines of "Oita beeps in annoying tones in diffrent patterns and pitches" It caused everyone to ;!beep in response as it soon turned into physisofical questions about diffrent things from me. Anyway, the comms thing should be considered IC and there was no antag interaction to my knowledge with it.

The vampire should not be rolled back. Secondly the chaplain is immune to mind powers except when the vampire is at full power. I don't want the chaplain to be some unstoppable force to the vampire. "lol he can kill them every time," is just a little lame. Cower, hide, and run.

Only way to get cyanide is really lucky cargo spawn for a container or cyanide apples that you mutate from regular apples.