-
Posts
2,178 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Garnascus
-
Character Complaint - Alex Eriksson
Garnascus replied to La Villa Strangiato's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
Actions have been doled out. This complaint is now resolved. Locking and archiving. -
@Spartan2548 Sure, unbanned. Make sure you read our rules too when you get a chance. We are a heavy RP server so we can be pretty strict as far as what your character is allowed to do. If that appeals to you you're welcome to stay. If not that is fine too. Either way the ban is so old there is no reason to think twice about this.
-
Character Complaint - Alex Eriksson
Garnascus replied to La Villa Strangiato's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
Alrighty, so just an update on all of this. TLDR is i see no reason to punish the HoS for anything he has done and i have discussed this issue at length with fellow staffmembers on our staff discord. If the HoS tells you not to grab a gun and you grab a gun anyway you are going to get shot. End of discussion. Ose was given a chance to surrender after being shot and he did not. Ose instigated this situation by grabbing a gun and not following the HoS's orders. The fact that the HoS responded with justified lethal force does NOT give any crew the right to shoot the HoS and everyone involved in shooting the HoS is probably going to have some action taken against them. @Drooling Cowboy There is a universe where taking a gun from the armory despite the HoS's order is an acceptable IC action. This would depend on the severity of the ghosts attacking the ship. It is almost impossible for me to actually determine how bad the situation was just from logs. You where incredibly verbally aggressive during your prison sentence, you did threaten the HoS and all of security, you did take a lethal weapon when ordered not to, you where given more than once chance to surrender as @Flpfs screenshots show. Whatever "the line" is for rulebreaking character behavior you are DEFINITELY on it and you may even be over it. @Axton_Wake As i explained in my previous post I think your actions where fine. You definitely displayed the nuances of IPC behavior here by "swiping away" your emotions and doing your job. @Minzeyes Attacking the HoS was absolutely inappropriate. When a member of the crew antagonizes security and forces a particular response you cannot use that as justification to kill them. Action will be taken against you @MadMurky Based on your own testimony you saw @Minzeyes character fire upon the HoS and the HoS returned fire. The HoS defended themselves against emma pessic and you shot them for it. Completely unnaceptable and the Ohse situation starting this all does not justify you shooting the HoS either. Action will be taken against you. @La Villa Strangiato As i understand it you did not shoot the HoS at all and only refused to treat him later. Your character is a pharmacist and generally there isnt really an expectation for pharmacists to treat people. You make medicines and maybe have first aid training but thats about it. Our team as a whole takes a very dim view of any player who refuses to do their job for any reason, you need a really good reason it since our entire server relies on various crew doing their jobs at all times. I think you have a reason here so i do not feel action needs to be taken against you. I am not listing the specific action taken against people because its going to depend on various note/warnings/ban histories and this complaint would go on for another week if i waited to do all of that. -
Character Complaint - Alex Eriksson
Garnascus replied to La Villa Strangiato's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
So based on @Axton_Wake's post here it seems he did all he could to try and treat you. Do you have any issues with his post? I will say that at the very least "hanging out with the corpse" is actually totally reasonable if it was someone you cared about deeply and if its true he made a good effort attempt to treat you then its completely his character's prerogative. -
Character Complaint - Alex Eriksson
Garnascus replied to La Villa Strangiato's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
I just don't buy it, frankly. We never have this discussion during any of the 12 horrendously violent merc rounds we have a week. We never have this discussion during any of Alb's or the lore teams events when they get violent. Hell this round itself had ghosts flying around breaking stuff and i certainly do not see any character in this thread justifying not doing their job because of it. It is theoretically possible for your character to reasonably roleplay being unable to do their job for X reasons but it seems to be so rarely and inconsistently applied in our community it makes me question it. I'm not necessarily saying either of you are breaking rules (you and the IPC). I don't know and this is only a small part of this overall complaint. This is even more of a reason to not involve yourself. If none of your characters have the context for an order the HoS is giving then you dont interfere. Disallowing certain crew members from accessing the crew armory IS the HoS's call to make. Full stop. If you disobey that order the consequences are on your character. You dont have the right to rear end someone and then complain that they stopped. -
Character Complaint - Alex Eriksson
Garnascus replied to La Villa Strangiato's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
Discussed this with a lot of staff on discord. The general consensus is this, the HoS absolutely had the right to shoot @Drooling Cowboy and kill him given the circumstances. If a head of security orders you not to pick up a lethal firearm and you do it anyway you are getting shot. End of discussion. This does not give any crew the right to involve themselves in the situation and attack the HoS and i am currently looking through logs to get a better picture. The HoS gave Ohse multiple chances to surrender and ohse did not. You are not permitted to involve yourself in security situations like this. I am personally not keen on medical players EVER refusing to treat people regardless of the circumstances. Its the same as killing someone because you're literally letting them die in my mind. That being said i understand being incredibly grief-stricken over your girlfriend having just been killed. EVEN IF your girlfriend was in the wrong i dont know how reasonable it is to expect your character to act totally rational in that situation. As far as refusing to treat someone who killed someone you where friendly with....frankly, its your JOB to treat crew. It is a server rule that your character must be able to perform your job to an acceptable standard. We really cannot have medical players picking and choosing who they treat because their friend was just killed by the janitor or someone else in the crew. Treat them, cuff them even and then hand them off to security so they can be tried and investigated for any wrong doings. -
Character Complaint - Alex Eriksson
Garnascus replied to La Villa Strangiato's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
Will read this over later today. So if i am tracking correctly nobody involved was an antag? Does not immediately make anyone guilty. -
Sorry for the late response. Was not aware this existed. My fault. Anyways, warning seems justified to me. Alb is correct that event volunteers are held to a higher standard due to the potential to really mess up a lot of work people put in to run events. A warning is exactly that "Hey you should not do this please dont do this again".
-
No, sorry man. Stuff like this is wildly inappropriate and essentially ensures you can never be unbanned. You will need to find some place else to play unfortunately.
-
Alrighty. locking and archiving.
-
Ok, so basically the claim is that @Scheveningen is instigating all of these fights IC and is motivated by OOC grudge? If this is true i would expect the majority of these IC fights to be instigated by @Scheveningen and not @Sputnik5927. Does ANYONE have logs to support either of these claims? I see some singular messages being posted here but its hard to understand the relationship here without larger conversation logs.
-
Staff Complaint - Roostercat12
Garnascus replied to TrickingTrapster's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
Its absurd of you to even suggest we want stickmen because we wont allow you to play a character with big breasts. If you genuinely think this is what makes aurora bad server then you're free to go play somewhere else. Either way this complaint is locked and archived. Now and forever. -
Staff Complaint - Roostercat12
Garnascus replied to TrickingTrapster's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
Trick, man we have NEVER in the history of aurora allowed FTs depicting anything to do with breast sizes. Full stop. End of discussion. I myself told you not to use a particular flavor text picture of your character depicting it with large breasts YEARS ago when you where still on staff. I really have no intention of dogpiling you or insulting you here. The overwhelming majority of flavor texts never get read. It is entirely possible for someone to slip through the cracks for years with FTs that break the rules. Its overall not that big of a deal. When someone finally notices as is what happened here all we do is ask them to change it. -
Again, we do not allow ANY descriptions of busts within flavor texts. Full stop. It is just not something we allow here and matt explained this to you. I am afraid there is nothing else to say here. Locking and archiving.
-
Descriptions of busts are unfortunately not really allowed here. I am not trying to imply you where trying to ERP or anything like that, i do not think thats the case here at all. It is just something we generally do not allow in flavor texts. It seems based on the logs here all Matt did was say "hey man you cant do this" and did not punish you further. So it seems to me thats as far as this needs to go?
-
Why did it need to mention your "bust"?
-
-1 voting for dismissal. Always had enjoyable experiences playing alongside a borg.
-
The ban is like 6 years old and from someone who is no longer a staff member. Not gonna ask any questions. You're unbanned.
-
Locking and archiving.
-
Staff Complaint - Head Administrator Alberyk
Garnascus replied to Marlon P.'s topic in Staff Complaints Archive
And it was dealt with. And it was handled. And it will be handled. Anyone can make a complaint. As i have said i have access to all of the staff channels. Alberyk had nothing to do with the judgement on your player complaint, It was independently investigated. I do not believe he abused the system to retaliate against you. All i think you are showing is that Alberyk had issues with you he wanted to bring up officially (In a complaint) and he broke a couple of rules. This does not change the outcome. -
Mack asked you in the DMs if your raging was ironic or not. You told him "No im fucking pissed you're dumb as shit and you should feel bad". You also said to him "I wish i could strangle you". This is legitimately the most textbook form of harassment I have ever seen. You do not have a place in our community. Sorry man.
-
Staff Complaint - Head Administrator Alberyk
Garnascus replied to Marlon P.'s topic in Staff Complaints Archive
Yah id say so. At least in spirit. I just dont see how he retaliated against you. The strike he issued you was not a reason for your ban. -
Staff Complaint - Head Administrator Alberyk
Garnascus replied to Marlon P.'s topic in Staff Complaints Archive
From my perspective Alberyk did not use the complaint system to retaliate against you. Alberyk had absolutely nothing to do with the judgement against you on that complaint. The staff member who banned you brought up a multitude of issues. I dont think its fair to say Alberyk was re-litigating the strike. I do think its weird that Alberyk posted your play time though. We shouldn't be trying to invalidate opinions based on play time. Our positions should be able to handle a little scrutiny. -
Staff Complaint - Head Administrator Alberyk
Garnascus replied to Marlon P.'s topic in Staff Complaints Archive
No