-
Posts
2,194 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Garnascus
-
I will give this a proper reply tomorrow morning sometime. I think i am more keen on players themselves not being able to remove them. Its technically against the rules when people remove canon security incidents from their records. All parties involved must agree for any conflict to not be canon. Unfortunately theirs no system that notifies us when players do it and theirs no easy way to investigate it unless security regulars or HoPs are perusing records and notice an incident that was recorded is now gone. I do not even know if i like it yet though.
-
We will see what delta thinks when he wakes up.
-
The point i am making is you DID cause extreme collateral damage. You are responsible for that. Nearly the entirety of the middle level was vented. If you had just left it with the one bomb near engineering to get people scared that would have been fine. Three bombs is going to ruin the round regardless of how much you stagger them.
-
you did NOT get full permission for bombing man. You asked me where did disposals lead and i told you it leads to the trash compactor below the janitors closet. That is an area that is largely out of the way and should have been fine to bomb. You bombed the brig entrace, the library and maintenance near engineering storage. You completely ruined the round and caused a large amount of people to die due to low pressure.
-
The player in question has a large quantity of notes, warnings and even a few bans for all around awful behavior. They have had numerous chances to improve their behavior and have not done so. This situation is pretty clear cut grief. There is no reasonable explanation for their actions IC. A permanent ban will be applied to them which they are free to appeal at a later date. I will now consider this matter closed.
-
[Resolved] Alberyk, vampires and MG
Garnascus replied to Nebirots's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
the warning looks valid. I really feel like you watched them like a hawk just because you knew OOC they where vampires. That is not fun for anyone. -
[Accepted] Artyom21s 3 (nearly 4) year old ban appeal
Garnascus replied to Artyom21's topic in Unban Requests Archive
Ban lifted. No idea why your previous appeal was denied. Must have been a clerical error. Should have been lifted instantly because its so old. -
[Resolved] Character complaint against Alicia Forest
Garnascus replied to Knightroid's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
This thread specifically mentions a round on the 13th. Any info on that specific round to help me sort through the logs? -
[Resolved] Character complaint against Alicia Forest
Garnascus replied to Knightroid's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
As long as they are not setting it up and then causing it to be released i do not see an OOC issue. -
[Resolved] Character complaint against Alicia Forest
Garnascus replied to Knightroid's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
Shit, thats my bad. i meant "september". Misread the date on the warning. -
[Resolved] Character complaint against Alicia Forest
Garnascus replied to Knightroid's topic in Complaints Boards Archive
The player was warned on the 11th of august for constantly letting the tesla escape. Did they continue this behavior at all past this date? -
Warning looks pretty valid to me man. You cannot claim you're an "unwilling participant to ERP" when you give someone a safe word.
-
Delta could have definitely responded to this complaint better. The main issue in the OP has already been cleared up and while the screenshots you list are problematic they are very old. I do not really think its fair to save up issues with a person and then dump them all some time in the future. Added to that myself, abosh and delta recently had a conversation. Various issues where addressed and his conduct was one of them. Essentially its something we've already dealt with. That being said i really cannot condone how delta responded to this. staff complaints ideally exist as a dialogue between a staff member and a player. if a reasonable outcome cannot be reached then a higher up steps in and settles it. All that was really needed here was one post from delta somewhere along the lines of "i did what i thought was ok at the time and i am taking steps to improve on X" Hopefully in the future that is how this will go from now on. hopefully xander will report issues to another staff member when they initially crop up and not weeks or months from then. Unless there is anything else i will consider this resolved.
-
[Resolved] Unfair warning issue from a rescue attempt?
Garnascus replied to AnyaShimizu's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
Looks like the warning is valid based on datberry's and pisest's testimony. You appear to have gone a little too far. -
Discussed this with alb. Gonna go ahead and unban you. Please follow server rules and role play appropriately.
-
You where PMed by delta about your shitposted before i had made my statement about shitposting. Specifically when it is and isnt ok to do so. That is my opinion as head administrator and the post xander made on that thread is well within the guidelines i have established.
-
I definitely remember your ckey. Definitely some funky necromagic going around. Pretty sure all the OGs will be back and they will attempt a coup on me.
-
Definitely not happening man. The closest thing you will get to it is rev rounds. Loyalist captains and HoS's can be literal space hitlers. Like others have said theres merit to always being able to trust a certain role.
-
[Denied] I'm back (hopefully)
Garnascus replied to listendudeiwannadie's topic in Unban Requests Archive
Sorry man its not gonna happen. Your CID is constant in 60-70% of the bans so you either where not using a spoofer or you installed it incorrectly. There is basically no way for me to justify lifting this ban. I am afraid you will just have to move on. -
Im sorry man, I accept your resolution here but the ban is going to stick. Your defence was basically "its not technically ERP". Emoting literally whippin your dick out is just one of them things we cannot be lenient on. As much as i dont want to sound like an asshole "your actions have consequences". Just wait out the 72 hours and then you're welcome to comeback and have fun.
-
[Resolved] Staff Complaint: Scheveningen
Garnascus replied to Kaed's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
Myself, abosh and delta had a conversation about various issues. Chief among them being the need to distance yourself from issues you are directly involved in. This will be considered resolved and will be locked and archived. -
[Resolved] Staff Complaint: Scheveningen
Garnascus replied to Biabri's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
Yeah the attitude is gonna stop or i will be forced to lock this until delta can respond. -
[Resolved] Staff Complaint: Scheveningen
Garnascus replied to Kaed's topic in Staff Complaints Archive
The warning is completely and utterly invalid on one single base alone. We do not take action against issues we have a direct involvement in. Every staff member is taught this and learns it as part of their trial. It is entirely possible for an emergency situation to crop up that leaves you no other alternative. This situation is not one of them. I am going to remove the warning and delta, myself and abosh will discuss what happens next,