Jump to content

Garnascus

Whitelisted Players
  • Posts

    2,194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Garnascus

  1. Sorry man, not gonna happen. I just feel like you think this is all one big joke.
  2. Unbanned. Meme role was pretty dumb to begin with. Its no longer a thing. Just read the rules and keep excessive shitposting/memes in the trashcan.
  3. You where given a warning for your actions which resulted in the server crashing. Thats really as far as this particular matter is going to go. You're notes are all tied together based on IP and CID so... we know. This ban request is invalid and a ban will not be placed on you.
  4. seconded. you still need to act as an atagonist. you're not allowed to just play as your regular crewmember "but i have super powers!!!!".
  5. I forgot about this, ill admit. Some stuff happened at work that made us all have to cover more shifts. Anyhoo Ive stuck a warning on the guy to review. The small pattern of behavior we have on him thus far indicates hes likely just a new player doing dumb things. THIS TIME leniency will be shown but should it happen again we will not hesitate to unsheathe our blades.
  6. i am going to need to make the assumption that you are arguing entirely IC here. My response changes a little based on this perspective. For the moment i will assume we are pretending that there isn't a human player sitting at a keyboard playing the IPC. It is unreasonable to completely disqualify IPCs from being security personnel just because they cannot feel pain. A machine is able to perfectly asses a threat and correctly determine the proper response based on the tools it has available and the programming it has received. They do not need to get tasered to understand "this really fucking hurts when i shoot it at organics". Same thing with pepper spray. In fact the practice of it being done in real life is kind of dubious. Most companies who manufacture Tasers DO NOT recommend they be used on cadet officers. Its just kind of accepted that officers will be think twice before using it if they themselves have experienced it. While pain is indeed hard to describe and probably impossible for a machine to understand i do not think it prevents them from understanding what excessive force is. As far as a machine's bedside manner is concerned, well im not sure. As i understand the medical profession has huge problems with "descriptions of pain". Theres been countless overhauls and suggestions and various standards to try to apply. i would argue that a machine could be programmed to scan for a set of variables and then attempt to make some educated hypothesis on how much pain the individual is in. Would they be as effective in that regard as a human doctor? I have no clue! I dont think thats enough to completely bar them from the field. Its weird though because i kiiiiiiinda agree with a part of your conclusion. My biggest problem with the lore has always been our lack of restrictions. our lore is not really the nicest universe at times. its full of racial tensions, civil wars, bigotry and amoral megacorps. A lot of this struggles to manifest on the station. We like to say "people are not their characters" but thats not really true. A part of ourselves will almost always bleed through in our role play. I like to think the vast majority of us are reasonable people and NOT racist or bigoted. Therefore everyone is totally cool with reptar being a CMO and mr. bigglesworth being a security guard. We have essentially no species restrictions when it comes to jobs available on the station. I think that is a problem.
  7. I have some issues with your reasoning here [mention]calion12[/mention] and i will attempt to explain them. The relevant server rule is this. Our goal is simply to asses whether there was a point or a reason behind a murder. Since this is a role play server we generally expect them to be a bit better than "i want the captains ID". Now by your testimony and that of the OP it seems to me this condition is reasonably fulfilled. Does it suck that someone was removed from the round? Yeah sure it does but we have to remember that death is part of the game. Either they killed someone to drive a story or they did not. I dont think his notes about similar situations are relevant here if he didn't break a rule. As i said it seems to me he had a good reason and a point to do what he did. Its kind of unreasonable to go "well normally this would be ok but you've went too far in situations really similar to this before". Now given these two points i feel the warning should be expunged entirely. If i am misrepresenting you or you do in fact feel he broke a rule please dont hesitate to argue it.
  8. Pretty much all of what we expect can be reasonably deduced. Its rare that it even affects the judgement call on punishing someone. [mention]Coalf[/mention] Might be able to elaborate in greater detail but as far as i am concerned heads of staff are just expected to be a little "better" at the game. Both in role playing and in various department mechanics. A research director consistently leaking phoron everywhere or a chief engineer blowing up the engine every other round would be looked at a lot harsher for example.
  9. No The captain is not trained nor expected to get physically involved in detaining or apprehending criminals.
  10. I completely understand this and i am empathetic to your feelings here dude. Regardless im going to have to side with abosh's original ruling here. You just need to apply with a fresh character and make a NEW application based on said character. you can still make Edgar an RD once you get your white-list.
  11. I agree with everything except this. you as an HoS do not get to order me to not wear a stab vest on green. You can order me to put it on if i am refusing for some silly reason. Security guards on our server have all the training of actual cops. the job title is just different. security guards in real life vary WILDLY in terms of experience and gear they carry. Generally security guards in real life are NOT trained to get involved physically. they are a physical deterrent and often dont even carry weapons. At least here in the US the training to become one is basically just a 40 hour course in a classroom. "observe and report" you dont get physical. thats for actual cops. You cannot really draw a fair comparison between security guards in real life and those on our server. Though you CAN find some security guards in real life that are almost or as well trained as cops.
  12. a station security officer is just as trained as a cop in biesal. they are trained to get involved and deal with physical situations. yes they are much less common in a workplace aboard a station but you STILL NEED TO BE PREPARED for situations you are TRAINED TO DEAL WITH. wearing a stab vest is a reasonable level of protection because in almost any situation where you would go "i need to go get my stab vest" you are already fucking dead. knives are fucking dangerous. you NEED to protect your vital organs in some way. No this doesnt mean we need to raid the armory every shift "because the crew might make guns". thats an absurd argument i hope we dont devolve into it. We are talking about a reasonable level of protection based on the duties and training of a job. You are absolutely a liability if you refuse to wear the vest and you are DEFINITELY wrong if you try to order your officers to not wear them on green.
  13. This implies that gank punishments cannot be applied if you are attacking someone that is armed and can harm you - I just want to know if this is still the staff's policy. In general yes but not always. You probably shouldnt try to monologue before you shoot at the detective wielding a shotgun yah know?
  14. Yeah i dont see a ban on your ckey so its gotta be a byond issue.
  15. Just dont break server rules.
  16. After some discussions in PM i am lifting this ban. Specifics of the discussion where mostly related to the OPs place of residence and other identifying information. That will of course remain confidential. You should be unbanned but if you arent just let me know and ill see what i can do.
  17. This is one of numerous niche situations you will find in this game. Making a set policy for every single one is impossible without subjecting our players to several novels to accompany the thesis of rules we already have. That being said we do make some attempt to form an understanding of sorts on the ethics of dominate. It bears repeating that we are not a hivemind and differing accounts of some staff allowing a certain thing while another staff member does not allow a certain thing will always be a constant battle we as a team will have to deal with. From the discussions we have had internally about this ability we have attempted to arrive at some general guidelines. The over riding philosophy here is that dominate is an absurdly overpowered ability and provides you with pretty much unlimited power in shaping a specific situation. With that in mind heres a few thoughts. Dominate orders must be short term There is no set time limit. Generally its around five or maybe ten minutes. Things you could reasonably accomplish in that time frame. The victim must make a good faith effort to follow it Dragging your feet, screwing up intentionally or "getting caught" are all examples of poor sportsmanship. Trust me you're not gonna get punished for playing badly. However it will raise some eyebrows if you receive a legitimate order to kill someone and you decide to toolbox them instead of shooting them in the head with your shotgun. Keep in mind you arent permitted to lawyer AI laws outside of egregious mistakes. It logically follows we do not allow it for dominate orders. Do not tell people to kill themselves Even in situations where you have a valid reason to kill someone this is super bad form on the part of the vampire. I cannot stress this enough. The ability is crazy strong. Put some effort into it and try to think of something a little more interesting. It is of course ok to make someone follow you so you can suck their blood. Vampires need blood to do things.
  18. Ill gather what i can and look through this monday. Aboshehab had somewhat of an eye on his behavior but it was during his break. Probably just a stern talking to if everything else is clear.
  19. I need you to tell me every ckey you have ever logged onto aurora with. This particular mirror ban has a spiderweb based on whatever ban evasion tools you used. Gimme that info + agree that you'll be permabanned pretty quickly if you screw up and ill unban you.
  20. Best way to get into character for me is to de-admin self.
  21. This looks to be resolved to me. Locking and archiving.
  22. yeah i remember you now. So heres your last unban appeal https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?t=8547 . you're basically asking me to believe you wherent ban dodging up until a few weeks until you appealed your ban. Any comment on that?
  23. Locking and archiving. Complaint is deemed resolved.
  24. Yeah, partially my bad here.
×
×
  • Create New...