The lancer

TO: Himari Kitaru, Captain, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that the investigation regarding your incident report has been reassigned to CCIABS Andrew Plastiras (the lancer). You may be contacted by the CCIABS for an interview, or you may contact them directly if you have any questions. -------------------- DTG: 02-17:22-TAU CETI STANDARD-01-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

Come to brasil

I'm shaking right now

Employee in question has terminated his employment with our company.

TO: Anna Clifford, Head of Personnel, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 25-16:56-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS

Barnacle Boy

15/12 trial started, will last upon completion of 2 IRs

15/12 trial started, will last upon completion of 2 IRs

Trial started 15/12 and will end upon completion of two IRs

Trial retracted

Bear is an ok lad that can rp properly, his characters are good and he could make a head easily.

I will be voting for dismissal. The current wording already conveys intent and clarity, describing that security uniforms should not include personal clothing, but only what is provided in your officer wardrobe.

Voting for dismissal. You shouldn't be able to carry around defence tools on your secure workplace. And with the recent artery additions blades become even more dangerous.

Voting for dismissal. It over complicates things and our current system works fine.

Voting for dismissal

Voting for dismissal. We don't need a new charge like this.

Voting for dismissal. There are already rules on escalation for security. If you witness bad behaviour you should IR or adminhelp.

Voting for dismissal, as per all the above and the previous policy suggestion to remove it.

Voting for dismissal. Micromanaging dresscode at this level is too tedious for a game. CMOs can enforce it themselves.

TO: Avery Dawkins, Captain, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: Due to unforseen circumstances, this report will be closed. Thank you for your understanding. -------------------- DTG: 29-23:31-TAU CETI STANDARD-11-2461 SIGN: CCIAMS

no............................................

Application denied. Applicant was informed in DMs.

Perhaps a cyber warfare focus thing the commander chooses that lets him hack doors or interact with station machinery would be cool.

will the commander be somewhere on the map in a different z level, on the station, or AI like presence?

accepted