The lancer

TO: IRU-Sentiment, Forensic Technician, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 14-11:31-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

I do not believe that more security regulations are needed. I already pulled the wiki guides on security (responding, arresting, etc) and placed them as official station procedures, I suppose I could add something that tells them not to mob up a place and leave the rest of the station unguarded. It ultimately falls to the Head of Security to police their officers though, as that's still the most effective way.

I don't believe that command should be forced to do it at this point. It would be better as a notice reminder. Maybe organise assistants under the service department too, in order to have a dedicated head of staff.

We could start referencing the station procedures articles to cut down on the length, and see how it goes from there.

I see no issue with this.

The pains of getting it through command are real, for it requires more people and time. On rounds where there is an antag, the above are ever more strained. Furthermore, command staff usually don't know what happened themselves, and defer the case to IRs. I'm not saying that command should do that, but if we want to make IRs more command centric, some things will need to be approached differently.

Trial passed.

trial completed

trial completed

Bravo

Bring back optional antag objectives to help out.

A lot of people play necropolis security contractors. While people losing or retconning their characters should not stand in the way of progress, I believe that some balances should be met. I am of the opinion that Necropolis being in 3 departments isn't a thing that would justify cutting out security, the thing which most people play necropolis for.

Knives will not be legalised. You can already add utility knife stuff for cargo or jobs that make sense to have them, it would be perfectly legal to carry, like the botanist's hatchet. But carrying non utility knives around in sheathes and boots is not a good idea. It would not make sense for a secure research station, and would give everyone the ability to carry a weapon, a poor choice due to the usual powergaming and validhunting arguments. If you have a particular reason to worry about your personal safety, you can ask for a weapons permit.

Trial passed.

My question is what knives exist to make the change for. Switchblades, tatical knives and such have been ruled out, and if you make a knife out of materials it's essentially a kitchen knife, which falls under the same category the hatchet does with the botanist.

Trial started 30/3, will end upon completion of 2 IRs.

no

Interview with the applicant: https://pastebin.com/5GnfxiKs

I rest my case.

Hepatica is a good roleplayer and community member in general, with good characters and overall interaction with others. They could manage an IPC whitelist with no issue. Brick seems like an ok chap as well, with more backstory put into him than the average factory new IPC.

The CCIA record, Gonzales being on his last chance, the arrest history and the current incident of being drunk and assaulting a subordinate/visitor at the time. This is all behaviour very much not fit for a head of staff. I thus judged that the demotion should be unappealable.

Binning due to the character no longer existing.

Trial started 28/2 and will last until completion of 2 IRs

Trial started 28/2 and will last until completion of 2 IRs

Interview https://pastebin.com/9iRSBwPs