The lancer

Commendation Report Rules and Guidelines Commendation Reports are a way for Heads of Staff to give deserving employees the aknowledgement for great acts of achievement, bravery/sacrifice, service to crew/company and anything else that is considered commendable. Upon review, if the acts in question are deemed worthy of a commendation, the employee will receive one in their CCIA records, as well as any other IC rewards. Commendation Reports must strictly be in IC format. Commendation Reports must be made using the format provided below. Commendation Reports may not be submitted in favour of non station characters or non-canon situations. Before submitting, make sure that the situation is being accepted as canon by the involved parties and server rules. Commendation Reports may only be submitted by Command Staff or a Nanotrasen Liaison. Commendation Reports themselves are not public knowledge. Any commendations, mentions or awards are, once they are granted. Do not file Commendation Reports for minor things or for people simply doing their jobs. The procedure will be relatively simple and will generally not involve IC interviews bar extraordinary circumstances. At most, witnesses will be asked their input either through a forum message or discord. Format: Title your report as: Commendation Report [Date] (Example: Incident Report 12/25/2460) [b]Reporting Personnel:[/b] xxxReportedBy [b]Job Title of Reporting Personnel:[/b] xxxTitle [b]Game ID:[/b] (Game ID of the round on which the incident took place. If you don't remember the exact one, then the round after or the round before works as well. Found in the chat log once you log in, under the status tab above station time, and the lobby tab) [b]Commended Personnel:[/b] (Name, Job Title) - xxxCommendedPersons - [b]Witnesses:[/b] (Name, Job Title: Short description of what they witnessed) - xxxWitnesses - [b]Time of Commendable Act:[/b] (If unable to provide, leave blank) [b]Real Time:[/b] (E.g 0500GMT 3/25/18) [b]Location of Act:[/b] xxxLocation [b]Overview:[/b] (General description of what the employee did to deserve a commendation, including as much detail as is deemed necessary) [b]Additional Notes:[/b]

TO: IRU-Zenith, Detective, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIABS Andrew Plastiras, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: The investigation of this incident has concluded, and appropriate action has been taken for affected individuals. This matter will now be considered resolved. -------------------- DTG: 04-11:52-TAU CETI STANDARD-08-2462 SIGN: Andrew P.

Haydizzle shows that they can roleplay well in game, and has recently picked up the pace and plays regularly on the server. They also act fine oocly and are a great person to interact with in the community, so I see no issue with them getting a whitelist in those regards.

TO: Layla Starr, Cook, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 24-12:26-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Song Sun, Chief Medical Officer, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 24-12:18-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Jose Dean, Station Engineer, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 24-12:07-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: IRU-Zenith, Detective, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that an investigation has now been opened regarding your incident report, and assigned to CCIABS Andrew Plastiras (the lancer). You may be contacted by the CCIAA for an interview, or you may contact them directly if you have any questions. -------------------- DTG: 18-13:26-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: IRU-Zenith, Detective, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 16-10:42-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

We do have a charge called "use of excessive force" which is aimed for security. Brandishing weapons is also covered by the station alert system. If need be we can just add that into the charge.

Nope is ICly and OOCly a good player, who recently made a warden character that seems a bit more serious than Mens, which is good for the whole whitelist situation. Even then, his roleplaying is great and has played long enough to know how things work.

Half of the reason people are in ccia are to actually play a ccia agent. If you just take it to the discord as a default, you remove the main appeal of the job, if there are any to begin with. Discord interviews are also less reliable, and can more easily be manipulated, which of course wouldn't be the norm, rather something to think about. Using borealis is also not great, as ccia doesn't get that much of a technical support to start with. We only have arrow rarely coding WI things. This isn't to bash arrow by any means, as he's been very helpful already. It's just that if we had a consistent coder support for the WI, we could port everything there. Which brings me to the next point. What takes time is not the scheduling of the interviews, or the interviews themselves. It is the mind numbing volume of dumb things that need to be done in order to log and process the IR. You need to juggle between the WI, the public IR forums and the internal ccia IR forums. You have to go find a bajillion different formats for logging, IC messages and all that. While the process can be finished in a reasonable timeframe, it gets tedious after so many IRs. It usually takes someone brave to go and devote time to log every IR that has been sitting there in one sweep. You then have to wait for the admin liaisons to clear the IR. Arrow recently coded a WI thing where we can check for antags ourselves, but this does not solve the issues of let's say, the offender receiving an ooc punishment, which would render the IR unpersuadable. Liaisons themselves do have lives, and we usually have to wait for a while. After going through all that, you need to find someone to take the IR. People do have jobs and lives, and taking an IR is kind of a long term commitment, unless you really put your back into it and go through everyone rapidly. Discord interviews would cut the time for that final stage, but honestly while that last stage is what everyone sees, it's the only stage where we get to do something that's not staring at the forums. As for what geeves said, that is a whole different can of worms. How will the liaison do that? What stops an offender from going "he's bullying me"? If someone does something stupid in a round and gets reported, I believe they should face the consequences of their actions.

Lowpop may have its issues, but everyone should still be able to vote what they want to play.

TO: Chris Dumm, Forensic Technician, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report is unable to be pursued. The offender in question is not under our employment anymore. -------------------- DTG: 14-12:38-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Chris Dumm, Forensic Technician, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 14-11:48-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Lin Dyslioth, Forensic Technician, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 14-11:48-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Valentine Kassel, Forensic Technician, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 14-11:31-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: IRU-Sentiment, Forensic Technician, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 14-11:31-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

I do not believe that more security regulations are needed. I already pulled the wiki guides on security (responding, arresting, etc) and placed them as official station procedures, I suppose I could add something that tells them not to mob up a place and leave the rest of the station unguarded. It ultimately falls to the Head of Security to police their officers though, as that's still the most effective way.

I don't believe that command should be forced to do it at this point. It would be better as a notice reminder. Maybe organise assistants under the service department too, in order to have a dedicated head of staff.

We could start referencing the station procedures articles to cut down on the length, and see how it goes from there.

I see no issue with this.

The pains of getting it through command are real, for it requires more people and time. On rounds where there is an antag, the above are ever more strained. Furthermore, command staff usually don't know what happened themselves, and defer the case to IRs. I'm not saying that command should do that, but if we want to make IRs more command centric, some things will need to be approached differently.

Trial passed.

trial completed

trial completed