The lancer

Bravo

Bring back optional antag objectives to help out.

A lot of people play necropolis security contractors. While people losing or retconning their characters should not stand in the way of progress, I believe that some balances should be met. I am of the opinion that Necropolis being in 3 departments isn't a thing that would justify cutting out security, the thing which most people play necropolis for.

Knives will not be legalised. You can already add utility knife stuff for cargo or jobs that make sense to have them, it would be perfectly legal to carry, like the botanist's hatchet. But carrying non utility knives around in sheathes and boots is not a good idea. It would not make sense for a secure research station, and would give everyone the ability to carry a weapon, a poor choice due to the usual powergaming and validhunting arguments. If you have a particular reason to worry about your personal safety, you can ask for a weapons permit.

Trial passed.

My question is what knives exist to make the change for. Switchblades, tatical knives and such have been ruled out, and if you make a knife out of materials it's essentially a kitchen knife, which falls under the same category the hatchet does with the botanist.

Trial started 30/3, will end upon completion of 2 IRs.

no

Interview with the applicant: https://pastebin.com/5GnfxiKs

I rest my case.

Hepatica is a good roleplayer and community member in general, with good characters and overall interaction with others. They could manage an IPC whitelist with no issue. Brick seems like an ok chap as well, with more backstory put into him than the average factory new IPC.

The CCIA record, Gonzales being on his last chance, the arrest history and the current incident of being drunk and assaulting a subordinate/visitor at the time. This is all behaviour very much not fit for a head of staff. I thus judged that the demotion should be unappealable.

Binning due to the character no longer existing.

Trial started 28/2 and will last until completion of 2 IRs

Trial started 28/2 and will last until completion of 2 IRs

Interview https://pastebin.com/9iRSBwPs

TO: Carlos Clarke, Visitor, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: The investigation of this incident has concluded, and appropriate action has been taken for affected individuals. This matter will now be considered resolved. -------------------- DTG: 17-21:39-TAU CETI STANDARD-02-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Carlos Clarke, Visitor, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that the investigation regarding your incident report has been reassigned to CCIABS Andrew Plastiras (the lancer). You may be contacted by the CCIAA for an interview, or you may contact them directly if you have any questions. -------------------- DTG: 13-13:55-TAU CETI STANDARD-02-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

Trial passed.

denied

I agree, this will make it easier to distinguish between the two.

Trial completed with success.

TO: Dar'kalh Raghragh-Jhun Mre[...], Research Director, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report will not be further processed due to multiple reasons. We remind you of your Non-Disclosure Agreement. If necessary, you will be contacted by Company authorities for further compensation. -------------------- DTG: 06-20:33-TAU CETI STANDARD-01-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS

trial has been a success