Azande

Captain is actually usually almost always on according to Arrow's statistics "Regarding that there is no hop and qm in most of the rounds: From the last 100 rounds, there was no hop AND no qm in 13. And the number where there is no hop, no qm and no captain is even lower." If a non-antag is being suspended, it is something CCIA should at least be glancing at and should be used more seriously than it is.

[mention]ForgottenTraveller[/mention] @ing you since you're the leading NCF decision maker.

At the moment, any Head of Staff is able to completely suspend the contract of any crew member in their department, suspension being the more serious form of a demotion, in which someone's ID is wiped of access, and their account is either frozen or has their pay withdrawn. I believe it would make more sense if the form required a Head of Staff's Signature and an IAA's signature, or a Head of Staff's and the Captain's, but not exclusively, so like the Avowal form it'd be like where either the Captain or an IAA can sign: Captain/Internal Affairs Signature: [field] This means a suspension must go through one of two trusted corporate officials as well as the department supervisor, rather than just that supervisor.

if people make spells like 'Fuckus Offus Secus' for shit like magic missile I assume staff will deal?

Thanks for your response, I was starting to wonder if this had been forgotten, I think you've addressed all the points.

I had SUGGESTIONS for changes, this is just an open discussion, better of in general.

This was completed, should probably be archived or moved to Completed Projects

Bump.

[mention]LordFowl[/mention] if you become Dev again, look at this. It would be very nice to be able to build these things.

Bump? this still seems cool.

You have incident reports to handle people who don't do their job, use them or talk to an onboard IAA. [mention]Lohikar[/mention] is this even a suggestion?

tl;dr But. This is a game, you can't force someone to do something they don't want. It also means you need to put EFFORT INTO GETTING SOMEONE rather than relying on your insta-rune to mean you never have to worry about someone calling for help.

You work on a small facility with the same 250-500 individuals again and again and again daily, you ride the same shuttles over, and back, you drink at the same bars and most of you will also live on the Odin together. Most people know one another by default because of this. I don't like this idea, it's a game.

Honestly, the lab needs a little desk-office space to do shit with, the last lab had a desk space to work at, I don't think this one does.

90% of a roboticists job is making robotic things, I'd say at least 45% of robots are cyborgs, it's only logical they can do a brain transplant into an MMI. We have always left it up to the roboticist for the most part on whether they can do so or not, but the title 'Biomechanical Engineer' should definitely know how. I see no reason to enforce changes.

1. You didn't use the format :/ 2. Enough Sol uniforms plz, it's very taboo to wear them in Tau Ceti's current political-social climate.

I think most dionae characters have their own sense of style and I can usually eyeball who is who as a result.

Suspension generators also do not fit in crates, but we can order those! Code can make it work.

Perhaps a compromise is in order, what if we followed in Goon's footsteps and made Merchant a 'job of the day', in which there is a 20% chance (the current Merchant probability for a round) that for the current day, the merchant job will be open all day, and an 80% chance that there will be no merchant for the day. This will mean we see more merchants, but less often - kind of bridging the gap. Thoughts?

As I have not interacted with Jaeger recently, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you have worked hard to improve, which is admirable. +1

However, because you did not notice this, I was left to defend myself from what I consider a very pointed insult - And note, my response to their comment was literally: Who even are you I've talked to this Furry once before I did not continue this discussion, I was talking to somebody else when they again, tried to engage with me, if you look above this comment of theirs, I was not speaking to them after the end of the previous discussion.

BYOND Key: XanderDox (Discord Name) Staff BYOND Key: Alberyk Reason for complaint: Giving a strike without explaining why did not strike people clearly attacking my person or ask them to stop. Additional remarks: There was a heated discussion between Sabbie and myself and others a few minutes before this. Alb stopped it, I stopped addressing Sabbie. I started talking with Pacman and made a joking comment, something we are all very used to here on Aurora and only literal idiots would think is serious, "Can we ban Pacman?" and when asked why I said "For being Pacman." , I think that is clearly a meme, I mean, how many times have we banned Voltage for being Voltage? Anyways, Sabbie chimed back in, despite not being involved in my conversation here, with: I responded by asking who they were, and saying I've spoken to this 'Furry' (their name is Fox so like??? Safe assumptions) once before now. I then said I would defend myself if staff were not going to enforce their rules of not being a dick. I was then striked for calling into questions staff's ability to enforce their rules, apparently but was not provided a strike reason.

Eh. I'm not at all a fan of Ashley Jaeger, and whether she is a reflection of your OOC abilities as a player or just a complete character, I'm not sure. I do enjoy your unathi officer however, so perhaps it is just a character issue. Withholding support or against for now!

Eh, I've rethought after discussion, I think this could work fine if devs implement it properly.

can we at least let some discussion happen before we vote for dismissal?