MattAtlas

Accepted.

On trial until 13/07/2018.

Please give them some options for bags though, because I think backpacks are the ugilest things in the game and will cry if I can't have a satchel They'll get their selected backpack type in character prefs, but syndicate.

This changed recently. https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?f=125&p=101710#p101710

Fairly easy to implement. I will do this tomorrow.

On trial until 7/07/2018.

There are no stuns in the proposed changes. Yes, thus it doesn't really require any further change. Switching to what you proposed in the thread is pretty much a nerf-- increasing blindness and dizziness wouldn't make up for the loss in massive screen wide blanking, I'd think. Edit: Give me 10 hours until I wake up and I'll give a proper, clean breakdown of every change. Promise.

Keep the flash as is. I wouldn't mind the pepper spray stun being removed either-- moving to non-stun based combat is a GOOD thing.

I will be contacting you for an interview soon.

Should definitely have a timer yes. 2.5s should be fine.

Applicant's interview: https://pastebin.com/9HJUaL8e

As far as I can tell from deadminning, I can ahelp and then there's a close button via view tickets next to my ahelp, which works fine? Edit: Nevermind, doesn't work once the ticket is taken. Am dumb. I can support this, however.

I am fairly sure they can from view tickets.

This idea has merit. I will bring this up and formulate my own thoughts tomorrow. Thus far I like this.

After reviewing the evidence, Strudel and I have decided that in this context what Fernando did was acceptable to end the round, as the round had clearly run its course. However, chloraling the antag is still quite cheap and powergamey. We are considering this fine because of the future change in the hyposprays. As long as it is held as a last-last result however it will be fine. Satin will be spoken to about these kind of situations and other less-common powergaming situations and how to handle them. We are considering this resolved and locking this in 24h.

Alright, I've let this thread sit for too long. Apologies. The only remaining issue I find here is that Willow willingly went to an area with confirmed hostile presence by the AI to retrieve the medkit. Berry agrees me with in this. The ruling I'm about to give is that all Rosetango should do is avoid active situations such as raider presence unless they have a very good RP reason to be there-- and retrieving your medkit isn't a good reason. A verbal warning will suffice, I believe. Locking and arching, deemed resolved.

https://pastebin.com/unHTEKtk Interview.

Very good, I will contact you for an interview in the coming days.

Right. Our current thoughts on the situation are that there was no reason a janitor would go to an area with reported hostiles to acquire a medkit. It's frankly nonsensical. Furthermore, I completely disagree with the idea of a random crewmember ordering a medkit at roundstart to 'help out the medbay' or anything along those lines. It should be restricted to emergency situations. This applies to stocking up medical supplies as well-- it shouldn't be done in normal conditions. With the excuse given, it makes little sense to me that someone who fears blood would get themselves mixed in with blood by bandaging people's wounds. Berry agrees with my thoughts on the situation. Reply to my comment if you have anything else to say.

@DatBerry and I will be taking this complaint.

1. I do accept that if I go SSD again, I will either ahelp it or go off to cryo/dorms, and understand that failing to do so will result in further punishment. 2. I will keep my character in security, if there are no security positions I will either play as a visitor, or on another character. Thank you for considering this. Alright. Appeal resolved, security jobban lifted.

I can accept this appeal and lift your warden ban as well, provided that: 1) You strictly understand that if you SSD again without reasonable cause, without ahelping or going to cryo, the same punishment will be applied, except this time you won't be able to appeal for a long time. 2) You will keep your character in Security, you will not job hop with your security character. Reply to me when you accept these two terms and I'll lift your ban.

Skrell with helmets look completely retarded right now, so yes please.

Application denied due to lack of feedback. We also do not personally think you are ready to be a head of staff yet.

The "conditions" did not warrant absolutely any hostility. They were a simple set of questions to see whether or not you had improved from your Discord ban and if you changed your attitude. With your response, you confirmed that nothing changed, and so we extended the appeal period. Now, Aboshehab has gone over the complaint itself. I am going to go over why we banned you and why we denied your appeal. Let's take a look. - Why did we ban you from the Discord? Quite simply, it is because of the completely unacceptable attitude you displayed. You said you had 'good will' in mind, and that you argued, but a quick look at what you said tells a completely different story. In fact, I have some quotes. You even admitted to having the rules channel muted, it was you that said you 'enjoyed pissing on' Scheveningen. What you said was completely not out of good will, it was not an argument, it was just you throwing insults at someone else. This is completely unacceptable behaviour. But, even still, we did not ban you immediately. Coalf and I gave you SEVERAL warnings. Now, I do not have Coalf's warnings on hand: but I have mine. Let me show you how many times I've told you to quit your attitude: And you did not stop. You continued, until I had to have Abo ban you from the discord. Which you then appealed some time after-- I asked you some questions to see if you had improved in that span of time. With your response to Abo and I you showed that you didn't change, and thus we extended your appeal period.