Flamingo

I briefly glanced over the code and it does indeed check if the player in question is a staffmember, so it should be fine.

I will need you to respond before I can lift this ban. Thanks.

Locking and Archiving.

Alright sorry for the delays - going over logs is very time consuming and very mentally draining. Goret and I have nevertheless persisted and come to a conclusion on the matter. I will give a brief list of each point below for ease of reference: 1. It was actually their preferred course of action to use teargas grenades at the HoS' office and they were in the process of trying to get sec to do so when sec asked to just vent the room to force the traitors to surrender in order to avoid more damage. If they had jumped to this conclusion by themselves at the first sign of trouble then it would have been an issue, but it was something that came up later, and a better alternative was suggested anyways. We can't reasonably expect everyone to have every trick up their sleeve (N2O is rarely utilized after all and doesn't always come to mind immediately). 2. They didn't push for the cyborgification of both traitors. They only agreed for one of them it was probably okay, and the other they disagreed with. This is an acceptable form of punishment under regs, so we didn't really see an issue here. 3. They only punched someone in the face once after they were arrested, and after much taunting, and they were also not armed. They accepted charges when confronted about it. 4. Their being down in the AI core doesn't really matter, since they are authorized to be there, were unarmed, and initially went down to investigate after much sabotage had taken place. This one is the most difficult to determine through the logs but we didn't find any evidence of foul intent here and thus we deemed it fine. I think a lot of this complaint stems from the lack of information brought on by only having access to the radio and limited vision via cameras. Overall, while their IPC RP was not entirely up to snuff, it was a pretty stressful round, and the issues were addressed by the relevant parties (namely @kyres1, as they mentioned they spoke to them about the IPC play issues). A lot of their play would have been more acceptable had they been a stress-prone human, and thus we don't feel it requires additional action by administration. I think I have addressed all of the issues. I will be locking and archiving this in 24 hours if there are no objections. Feel free to contact me or @Goret directly if either party have further questions and don't wish to post here. Cheers.

Appeal accepted. Locking and archiving.

Please follow the format provided. I am willing to lift this ban, but you must make sure you ahelp if you need to leave quickly. It’s as easy as hitting F1 and saying you need to leave. Otherwise just go to cryo if you want to leave and it’s not urgent.

Application denied. You are encouraged to contact me directly if you have further questions than was already discussed.

Hello. This was a mirrored ban of bomboh12, yes. Do you live in the same house or something?

Locking and Archiving.

Interview: https://pastebin.com/tJP0nKfZ

I will contact you regarding an interview sometime soon.

I will be taking over for @Yonnimer. @Goretand I will be reviewing the logs for the next couple days. I encourage those involved to say their piece. If you are not involved, please do not post. Cheers.

Trial began as of June 17th, 2019. Trial will last for one month and end on July 17th, 2019.

Trial began as of June 17th, 2019. It will conclude in one month on July 17th, 2019.

Trial began as of June 17, 2019. It will last until July 17, 2019.

Oops. I forgot to actually close the app. Application accepted. Welcome to the team.

I will be handling this with @DRagO.

Interview: https://pastebin.com/NpKPvY84

I will be handling your interview in the coming days.

Echoing what Arrow said. Voting for dismissal.

Locking and archiving.

I have seen you ingame a few times, but have generally not interacted much due to IC circumstances. Regardless, I think he’s one of the more colorful and interesting characters to be around. I am always supportive of uncommon backstories.

Also going to voice my disagreement with this suggestion. Locking a species that is very rarely able to actually play behind a whitelist is just going to make it incredibly rare to actually see that species. I’d much rather see a blurb show up that gives some basic lore information on behavior and values. The loredev bit of this suggestion isn’t my department, but I wouldn’t really see it as necessary. Maybe something tacked on to another loredev’s duties if anything. They are already rarely seen, and since they don’t occupy a position in the station (other than the occasional merchant), their player base isn’t that large.

Clever, but combustion engines have been alternative forms of power dating back to before Aurora’s time. I can say matter-in-factly that’s I’ve seen it done in the spare chamber in atmospherics back in exodus days. As such, I’m not sure this incident is deserving of hall of fame status.

This application was accepted but a concluding post was never made. Welcome back to the team.