Garnascus

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh I am sure this happens because i personally have seen it too. I am super skeptical of it happening enough to warrant removing the clothes requirement because that IS a massive buff. You can wear a space suit without buying the gemstone spacesuit for example and no matter how many times you evade sec you can always jaunt away. So they will have to kill you and this might inadvertently make sec kill the wizard quicker because in the back of our minds we will know "there is no possible way i can contain this guy".

Ok, archiving.

Archiving

Ok, archiving.

I actually really like the concept of renegade. We are just experiencing growing pains with it as its not what we traditionally expect of an antagonist. It is your character given a specific flaw to work with in the case of extreme and irrational paranoia.

You're being very rude and incredibly aggressive so I do not think I will be lifting the ban at this time.

Lol, mate i PMed you a good 3-4 times. You just kept walking around the station so....yes i permabanned you. Administrator PMs are not optional to respond to and if you cannot do that then you cannot play here.

Locking and archiving.

This is so wholesome i have no prepared snark.

TRUUUUUUE

No real time limit. That would be kiiiiinda RP breaking im sorry to say.

No i am sorry but i think this is too recent.

Well when you're an antag you're allowed to begin with the motivation to fuck someone or something's day up for... almost any reason you want for your character. This is almost always going to pit you against security so circumstance depending you can justify some pre-emptive strikes. Destroying beepsky is an easy one. So for example if your goal is to rob the vault you could first take out beepsky because it could arrest you later.

We have a certain standard for what we consider to be believable characters here. Going back and destroying company property over this is simply not believable in a corporate setting. I am saying that this specific behavior does not meet the standards implied by our rules. I do not think it creates a healthy RP setting. I could of course understand destroying it in self-defense in the moment or if you where an antag you can easily justify destroying it.

I have spoke to read about this. He understands it was wrong and it shouldn't happen again. I will lock and archive this now with a note on him.

Yeah i am really sorry to say man i do have to agree with @Alberyk original judgement. You have to understand a similar line is fed to us from players a lot involving "convenient" series of events. The ban here is the line as far as our white-list rules go. At the very least it is all something you can earn back. It is not an albatross around your neck or anything.

Alright but as i understand it alberyk says he would have removed your whitelist even if he did not ban you. This is from your original ban appeal. I understand you tried to re-link them later but im afraid that does not really excuse the mistake you made to begin with. A bug is not to blame here. You missed a click to get a bludgeoning weapon in your hand. You mis pressed a key to switch hands. You forgot that a crowbar would start to open his chassi You also somewhere in this acidentally slid your ID on the borg to unlock his chassi to be crowbared? This is an absolutely insane series of mistakes man. Its pretty hard to believe man.

I will look at this tonight.

Enabling players to opt out of rounds before they even begin is in my opinion very unhealthy. The idea that the existence of one type of antagonist completely nullifies any fun you would have really raises some questions for me. Aurora's premise is a HRP server with antagonists enabled. So at any point an antagonist could show up and cause some chaos in your day or your friend's day. The idea that you can be in charge as to when this happens or even how it happens is simply incompatible with our server. I would really need to ask what you mean when you say "doing what i want". What is it that you want that a certain round type prohibits you from getting?

Locking and archiving this as the thread was re-submitted with corrections.

No i am sorry i will never support this. I have never understood the strange fascination for flavor text and character records. Its fine if you want to use them to add some depth to your character but making them a requirement would just be annoying.