Let me just go down a short laundry list of all the important points made in this thread. I have spent a number of hours reviewing all the screenshots, logs and evidence provided to me. I have read all the evidence posted here more than once.
Is it ok to play a problematic character to the point of upsetting people?
The short answer to this question is yes. The longer answer to this rightfully demands an explanation. menowns character is accurately described as homophobic, transphobic and generally not as progressive as most crew who find themselves aboard the aurora. A number of screenshots are linked here in this thread detailing interactions menown's character has over the relay and the general radio on station. They generally follow the pattern of someone bringing up the topic of relationships, homosexuality or transgenderism in some way, shape or form. Menown's character responds with "can we not" or "can we please not do this". Then of course either or an argument starts, or other player's characters insult him. That of course is justified. I think its fairly reasonable to say that menown's character is engaging in transphobia and homophobia. Our species page for tajaran does justify this sort of mindset with the following
https://wiki.aurorastation.org/index.php?title=Tajara
I can absolutely understand why menown's character is upsetting to people. I am not a trans person. I am a straight white male and I cannot pretend to speak for issues the LGBT community faces. I imagine your existence as a member of this particular member is constantly challenged. Either by a good portion of society who think being gay is immoral and all transgendered individuals are mentally ill or your loved ones who think you are "just going through a phase". Oppression does not always come with sticks and stones. It can come with smiles and nice words. Do you mind "cooling it" for thanksgiving with the family? Why do always have to make this about politics? I’m just trying to help you.
Again, I can only speculate but I imagine oppression felt by our players mirrors the kind of things menown has said. Hey, do you mind not being gay at the dinner table? Can you not bring up your trans stuff at thanksgiving? I think I can understand why this would be upsetting to people. I have always felt in my tenure as staff here that we have a duty to the rules. We should the kind of rules that foster an appropriate environment. It should enable our players to act in good faith and should always be what we use to assess a player's actions. It is impossible for me to create a consistent framework by which we analyze the harm done to an individual by actions that are not against the rules. If this is all this complaint centered on I would lift the ban right now.
Unfortunately, there is more. First I want to explain a little bit of how our philosophy works. Let’s say we have two players new to the server. The first player joins as an engineer during deadhour and fixates on the lofty goal of setting up the supermatter engine. Unfortunately, the player makes a few critical mistakes and the engine starts to delaminate. Nobody is around to help him, and all the available staff are busy playing warhammer 2. The engine explodes and an emergency shuttle has to be called. Do we ban this player for causing an extreme amount of harm to the rest of the server? Of course not. He made a mistake, a genuine one. He did not intend to ruin the round for the rest of the player base. He was simply trying to learn. We can teach this kind of player and thus we are very lenient with this type of player.
Let’s move on to the second player. This player joins in much the same way and also decides he is going to set up the supermatter. A similar series of events plays out. The engine starts to delaminate and the emergency shuttle has to be called once more. Luckily this time a particular admin had just been caught in forced march by grimgor's WAAAGH so he rage quit just in time to notice the ahelps pop in from the engine exploding. He PMs the player and asks what happened? It’s generally assumed engines explode as a result of an accident. This player however responds "FUCK HRP YOU'RE ALL SHIT HAHA I HAD FUN SEEING YOU KIDS RAGE". He gets banned. Do not pass go do not collect 200$. These two situations are similar in that both players caused the engine to delaminate. Both players caused the round to end pre-maturely. An equal amount of harm was done in both cases. The deciding factor and what spared the first player was intent. The first player did not intend to cause anyone harm and the second player did. Thus, he is a griffon and we ban them on sight.
I apologize for such a long-winded explanation of why we ban griefers but i want to be thorough here. Your intent, menown I believe is inappropriate. You yourself admit that you portray your character in this manner solely to bring attention the lore and to motivate change. I do not think you can in one sentence claim this and the next sentence say "well its just roleplay" when players tell you it upsets them. You're tacitly admitting to upsetting people being the goal here. You're attempting to generate outrage, controversy and opposition in the hopes this particular piece of lore is changed. This is far outside the established bounds we have of altering the lore and it is disrespectful to the team that writes the lore. Essentially, your intentions are inappropriate and you are playing in bad faith. I am afraid that based on this alone the ban is legitimate. You where on your "last chance" after your last permaban.