Jump to content

Garnascus

Whitelisted Players
  • Posts

    2,194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Garnascus

  1. I am looking in the administration control panel at our "board settings" panel. All i see is a variable to control how long until a warning expires. There does not appear to be a system ban once a user reaches X amount of warnings. I really do not see the issue here man.
  2. So Here is the thread https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=11529 Here is the post you made The projects and suggestions side of the forums is the devs domain. They reserve the ability to remove posts that violate our conduct rules. Shitposting in a work area like this isn't really tolerated as much as it is elsewhere. You where given the lightest form of punishment possible for it. A reminder to please not do this again. Your argument against this is that i say the word nigga every now and then? Wouldn't a reasonable human being go "oh alright in the future i will not shitpost in these threads!". I am not really seeing how this is an abuse of authority because skull doesn't like you.
  3. A welcome change. Theres essentially no reason to care about the different groups in a race if they can all be the same jobs anyway. I still kinda disagree with letting M'sai be HoS because functionally it ends up being one of if not the most important head of staff during any round with an antag in it. i understand this group is way more likely to be involved in fighting and security related fields due to all the civil war stuff. All in all i cant really complain.
  4. You where told no the previous time. That has not changed. You where given many chances on the discord and you broke all of them. sorry dude.
  5. Great. thats about as far as this one needs to go.
  6. You over reacted resilynn. In fact everyone involved in this complaint is kind of dumb. sooooo [mention]Resilynn[/mention] dont chloral and jacket your own staff like that. Call security or something [mention]Kappa[/mention] dont tell jokes like that. its going to get you into trouble. Resilynns actions are a little more reasonable with the logs.
  7. so.... Was kieran sedated and jacketed before or after he broke into medical? I assume before since his ID was gone? Heres what grinds my gears about this complaint though. "im stressed" is essentially a convenient excuse to self-antag. Sometimes its reasonable but its so absurdly overused and theres never any consequence for flagrantly disobeying regulations because antag rounds are not canon. Wait.. you where aware IC that kieran was just making jokes and you and read both decided it was a good idea to sedate and jacket him? You're gonna have to walk me through this series of events step by step because i really really hope i am missing something. Otherwise this sounds like super shit behavior.
  8. Hey I wasn't there I dont know what staff said and i dont necessarily condone it.
  9. In the former case we have to explain why NT metagames and in the latter case we have to explain why the roles that are normally implanted would be resistant to cult conversion and vamp shenanigans. It would require a lot of work for a payout im not convinced of.
  10. > This could be a staff complaint.
  11. I get it. I mean im not trying to be a dickhole its just how the chat is viewed and its GENERALLY what goes down in that channel. you arent there unless you died or ghosted and picking between salt and legitimate criticism from dead chat is real difficult with the log spam of the rest of the round plus dealing with the event itself. Thats why i said its better done in a format like this thread. Was this topic prompted by a single event? You all seem to be referencing it. Do we know who ran it or who handled it? i can bring them here for a dialogue.
  12. Admin run events or alberyk's events? You gotta understand that taking criticism for an event DURING the round is almost impossible. A vote at the end is really all the meaningful feedback you could get. Chat moves too quick and deadchat is and always has been salt chat. Its hard to sift through it all. Way easier to do after the fact in a format like this thread. There is ALMOST ZERO policy around doing an event. other than a vote the round before.
  13. Against an opponent like you im gonna have to go all out.... I CALL UPON THE POWER OF THE AURORASTATION WIKI https://wiki.aurorastation.org/index.php?title=Nanotrasen_Corporation BEHOLD! OUR CANON FOR LOYALTY IMPLANTS! Courtesty of [mention]nursiekitty[/mention] . I reject the argument that a loyalty implant makes your decision making un-fun. They simply alter your judgement a little bit. The important part is the bit i put in bold. This provides a logical basis for a loyalty implanted individual to do something extraordinary. There is a logical basis to strangle a murderer to death if he just killed your significant other for example. Its an out. It is not a perfect mind control device.
  14. I have given you every reason as to why i am not ruling against ezuo in this complaint. Whether you choose to accept it or not is not really my problem. Locking and archiving.
  15. (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ I do not know what else to tell you man. I just could not disagree more with your entire perspective here. Gonna have to rule against you.
  16. ITS NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO ANSWER YOUR AHELP I TOLD YOU ITS HOW WE ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS DEAL WITH THOSE SPECIFIC AHELPS THERE IS NUANCE TO "BEING INVOLVED" JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE PLAYING IN ROUND DOESN'T MEAN YOU ARE ALWAYS INVOLVED DO YOU UNDERSTAND?!
  17. Right, and im telling you for this question they do not NEED to notify anyone else and there is no official staff policy on managing things you're involved in. Its discouraged and 99% of the time staff disclose it and hand it off to someone else anyway. This isn't a case where he should have.
  18. So since theres no OFFICIAL WRITTEN DOWN POLICY of how to get an event adopted its irrelevant how lore devs have done it in the past? Even if i accept this you either dont understand or you do not agree why lore devs getting events done is different from a player ahelping and asking "for the round to be spiced up". I am saying that when lore devs HAVE gotten events done its never been ONLY an ahelp during the round "HEY CAN I RUN A LORE EVENT".
  19. Lore devs are a slight exception. Almost every time its been done theres some sort of communication before hand or a thread or some sort of administrator adoption behind it. There is an enormous difference between asking to spice up the round as a player and approaching an administrator as a lore dev and going "i want to run a lore event". Every mod and admin can see an ahelp when it arrives and they all hear the magical bwoink sound. It is certainly within the realm of possibility that an administrator could decide to over rule ezuo and add something to the round but is not the norm and it is not really how we operate I just do not agree this is a hostile response either. You asked a simple question "would anyone want to spice up the round if its extended" and he responded "the round type is the round type. if it is extended you will need to live with that fact".
  20. By default asking in ahelps for extra antagonists or things to "spice up the round" is a hard no. Anyone can and will tell you that. Sure there have been times when the stars have aligned and we've added some things or affected the round in some way. You basically should never ask for them.
  21. Ok, locking and archiving as OP has withdrawn their appeal. You're free to make an another in the future.
  22. STOP MAKING ME DO WORK archived
  23. I am not going to bwoink someone for making a weed joke after i play a weed meme song at round end. Thats just not gonna happen. Only rule around MIDIS is do them before the round starts and after the shuttle leaves. Round start and round basically. This is all i was involved with.
  24. Yeah thats about what happened.
  25. I always feel like i have to wring the smallest amount of acknowledgement for your bad behavior out of you. I get the feeling you think this ban against you was totally in the wrong. The goal here is to try to convince me you have genuine remorse or something.
×
×
  • Create New...