Arrow768

has been implemented. moving to completed.

Has been implemented. Moving to completed.

I´m gonna revive that and like to hear your thoughts given the recent discussion regarding drones in policy suggestions.

Has been implemented here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/4970

Moved to the archive in favor of https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5263 after discussion with op.

Moving to completed as they have been removed.

Moving to completed as that has been implemented.

Has been merged. Moving to completed.

Moving to completed.

Atmos has recently been changed here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5178

They are still in shock and denial

Implemented here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5300 Lockers are already implemented.

Atmos has recently been changed again: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5178 Moving to the archive.

They were added for a few months as part of the rotating weapons and have been removed again. Might be added again in the future (or not since they are quite op).

Moving this to the archive as its already implemented and we received no response from the author.

No author response. Moved to the archive.

Implemented here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5299

Implemented here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5297

Mixed secret is gone. Into the bin it goes.

Has been implemented aswell

That has been completed quite a while ago.

Implemented here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5265 Moving it to completed projects.

Has been implemented here: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/5268 Moving to completed projects

I dont see an issue with maint drones as long as they don't actively interfere with the current actions of an antag. If you break cameras and a few minutes later the maint drone comes along and repairs them, then that's fine. If you are in the process of breaking cameras and the maint drone repairs them after you break them and uses tables and vents to avoid being destroyed, than that is active interference which should be punished.

A militia is definitely not something that you would want to have during standard operation and should be forbidden (it already is due to neglect of duty, trespassing, possession of contraband, assault, ...). During non-standard operation (i.e. shits fucked) there is enough wiggle-room to ignore certain existing regulations if it ensures the survival of the station. A official IC policy that determines if, when and how a "militia" can be formed would acknowledge that the station regularly faces threats that can wipe out the entire security department. Otherwise there would be no need for a official ic policy that regulates that. Therefore I am heavily opposed to the idea of a IC policy.