KingOfThePing

Late reply here, I think this is pretty cool

Zundy

Fastest Code in the west

You two are overshooting it. Whitelist apps are not as serious as you two seem to take them. You can just do the following: - ask people in OOC if they want to review your app prior to posting the app and give you feedback (preferably these people are whitelist holders themselves). - ask in the species discord for feedback prior or past posting the app. - ask for feedback or ask questions directly to the deputies or lore master prior to posting or writing the app. I can assure you 200% that many, many, many people are gladly willing to help, review your app and give you constructive feedback and criticism.

[Moved to archives]

Man, when i first applied for a whitelist I got denied, too and I was super pissed about. I wrote a /very/ long essay about how I felt mistreated and in hindsight I feel like an absolute idiot about it. Shout out to my homie @CakeIsOssim. What you have to try to understand is, that the requirements or let's say the expectations for whitelist apps is relatively high because the people in charge put the faith in you that you dont fuck it up, to put it bluntly. A HRP environment just has certain expectations of you. Because if you do, they get blamed, too, not just you. So they naturally want to avoid that. I agree, that @niennab has a strict ruling (personal opinion here) but that's nothing bad. She gives constructive criticism and really cares about the apps that are posted. Dont be angry about it, see it as a challenge and maybe ask her in DMs or on Discord on how to improve and what is important to her. I would be surprised if she wouldn't give you more input in private. Tl;dr I know it can feel "unfair" that your app gets denied but the people in charge have nothing malicious in mind when they do, quite the contrary

they would probably just automatically take a cut off your wage by default instead of charging it per case basis then, probably maybe I guess. and why this doesn't really do anything the two posters before me explained pretty well. Sorry Zundy, can't agree with this one

Is this something I am too european to understand? Why would WORK related medical care, done AT YOUR WORKPLACE where you WORK and injuries and accidents are 100% WORK RELATED cost money? ?? ?? ??

Beepsky was our best man

I may not had the time to play the past few weeks so I did not have the opportunity to check it out, but I support this nontheless because of the reasons stated above. I think it's a good change, despite the top-down vision a player has as a default and the reduced vision the cone gives. I like it and will try it out this weekend, hopefully.

Weapons are deadly, bleeding out can happen fast. Taking fights is a risk. I dont see the problem

2501

It is cool. Why not, let's go

All pretty cool. Good work. Would love to see them in game

Dont worry, if you wouldn't have bumped it, I am sure Dronz would have. Eventually. And yes, the weapon exists and I disagree that SMGs are harder to improvise than shotguns, e.g. Modern Luty style SMGs are (partially) 3D printable. Really easy to assemble (they suck but thats not the point here). Problem nowadays, in some countries at least, is more the ammo than the gun itself. So not unrealistic to improvise with the help of some tools in a future setting! ?

Blessed

I like what Winter and Dronz say. A compromise would be the best thing here. The holo glasses also sound like a plausible solution and adding "normal" glasses of different variety also sound great.

I gave this suggestion some thought. While I still do not agree that the scenarios presented by Paradox are a problem since you can mute LOOC when they clog up your screen or do not feel to deal with it (no one is obliged to answer LOOC). I do agree though, that ghosts do not need it, since ghosts cannot contribute to anything IC, except helping new players or people new to a role, but in that case that should be dealt ICly or with an ahelp or their coworkers can answer in LOOC if there is no other way.

I think something like that was being worked on by @wowzewow some time ago

The english translation of the german source also leaves out one important detail on why this should be done (or at leats considered): To translate it freely it means that this project is intended to prevent one part of society from having knowledge that can be used for political purposes ahead of the other, thereby blackmailing the latter. I am not saying this would not be relevant in the future, I am just pointing it out. To the PR I am rather indifferent. Depends on how it looks I guess.

Like it is in any other Discord server: moderate it properly

someday, there'll be a reckoning, Zundy