MattAtlas

The story the game tells is not about your character and your character alone, but about the station as a whole. Telling a story requires sacrifice. You are inciting people to believe the opposite of what they should be. A story with no tension isn't what SS13 is about, nor does it make for an interesting one. You might like to chairRP, for lack of a better term, but you can't expect antagonists to conform to your weird "nobody should die" ideas. Cloning should die in a ditch and I agree there. Also nothing prevents MDs or surgeons from cloning other than CMO players. The issue is a mechanical issue, so this feels more like a "me no like antag" vent.

I've known you for a while and you've been a pretty solid roleplayer in my experience. +1

TO: Urzkrauzi Vizili, Head of Security, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that an investigation has now been opened regarding your incident report, and assigned to Lyla Faris (MattAtlas). You may be contacted by the CCIAA for an interview, or you may contact them directly if you have any questions. -------------------- DTG: 11-02:29-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Kaden, Security Officer, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 22-11-TAU CETI STANDARD-MONTH-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS

This sprite would not look very good in game. Not only are most colours unrelated to the departments, they're also WAY too bright.

aka just click examine on the person you dont know and you get added to the list automatically

@ReadThisNamePlz please lock this before people start going off on tangents

TO: Urzkrauzi Vizili, Head of Security, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 18-10:49-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS

I was originally against IPCs getting the chance to be HoP/HoS - I still am, I don't believe a robot should be commanding sec or having as much power as a HoP. Why? Because this reinforces machines not being considered a full "species". I don't like the basically almost human free reign that IPCs have nowadays, job-wise. Is it bad? Not really. Would I rather have the opposite? Yes.

You need to put in more effort into trying to act reasonably tame if you want people to know your character more for actual feedback. Most of the time I see you around I'm driven off by the kinda shit that makes me think "this feels like a 12 year old kid, not an unathi". So basically what Paradox said. Just dial down the "haha random humor" and you'll be fine. I'm sure you can make a good character, but the way you play kinda undermines it.

Many people would rather shut up and suffer rather than go through the process of dealing with you, if this is your attitude. Maybe it's not everyone that's wrong, but rather you.

Unable to pin their name and voice down until they get examined with an ID, maybe? It would be relatively simple to do, I think.

We do have a database though. Pretty sure this can be done. I really like the idea regardless, but it's gonna be real funny when the sec mains use 'Grizzled Voice'.

This is unnecessarily hostile. I've been courteous to you and I've laid out my facts in an objective manner. I've not gotten mad throughout this complaint. I ask you do the same, if you want a good discussion. I will not argue something that has already been handled by an admin. I only brought up that round as evidence of there being a problem, considering the ticket WAS handled. As such, this is not really a reply to the complaint, nor does it help your case. Once again, you're relying on people seeing your outbursts and getting pity points. I don't like that.

Unlike you, I cannot say I've met a worse HoS recently. Most people I've spoken to about Lin end up saying that they don't want to play security under them and just skip the round. Which is unfortunate, but this is the case when the player plays HoS for 10+ hours at a time. Every other HoS I've seen in recent times has outclassed them by far and large, simply because of effective communication and because they don't do the things I said Lin Dyslioth does in this complaint. This is a complaint and I'm outlining why I think the character should not be allowed to be in a command position. If you looked into my complaint for more than five seconds and reversed what I said, you would find what I think is wrong. This is an issue of their validhunty behaviour and Lin Dyslioth's insane tendencies IC. The solution is to not make Lin Dyslioth a HoS. It is that simple. Saying I shouldn't be complaining in a complaint is... pretty funny.

"In the end it's a game" is not a valid argument against a complaint. I'm arguing for making a character unable to be a HoS for the betterment of the game. If that's seriously your only argument, perhaps the original complaint is right.

I have already provided an example of this exact thing happening: the merc round she was punished in. Clearly, if she was punished, there is an issue. I wouldn't have made this complaint if that behaviour had stopped, which is why I provided another round ID where the exact same thing happens. @Cnaym, I think you misunderstand - I provide the round IDs, the admins provide the logs. I do not have any way to get logs as a player, because I do not save them and my own logs do not encompass the whole situation. Posting your own logs is downright deceptive and a shitty way of furthering an argument with subjective evidence, so please don't try to get me to do something like that, thank you. Natcula, I am in all honesty not interested in hearing a sob story. I'm not here shitting on you as a player. Everything I have said is what I have observed about your character with the evidence needed for the admins to reach a conclusion. I've not called you garbage, I've not called you a shithead, nor have I ever insulted you. There is no reason for you to go off on me like that. I do not appreciate trying to sway my argument with what is essentially just a sob story. I could not care less about people harassing you, I would have made this complaint regardless. Considering you won't be saying anything anymore, it'd be pointless to reply to you. Are you seriously implying I made a complaint because I have an OOC grudge? This is downright grasping at straws. I have provided objective evidence, including an entire round ID and the events from my side of the story - how is this an OOC grudge? If I had an OOC grudge I wouldn't have made a complaint in the first place, because I wouldn't have had hard evidence. The latter half of what you just posted makes absolutely no sense anyways. Of course, if I complain about the character, and the character vanishes and gets replaced by a better one, why would I complain? I can flip your own style of argument around too: your argument seems to be one you made purely because your friend's standing on hot coal. A metabuddy grudge, perhaps? I'm pretty sure you don't like being accused of having a metaclique, so keep that in mind. In addition, please don't try to undermine my complaint based on what others that are not me say. You can't go and say "This complaint has flipped its entire premise!" then the original poster hasn't actually made a post acknowledging what someone else says as true. I gave proof - the round IDs. I need nothing other than logs to prove my point. For the reason, see above. Note: "He did it, so I can do it!" is not a valid excuse to play a completely nuts head of security.

BYOND Key: MattAtlas Game ID: Not applicable - this is a complaint about overall behaviour on the character and player. Player Byond Key/Character name: Lin Dyslioth, MissNatcula Staff involved: None. Reason for complaint: Unreasonable character that should not be in a head of staff position, let alone be allowed to exist as is. To understand this complaint, you must understand the typical round that Lin plays in. Any antagonist whose gimmick does not entirely revolve around Lin gets immediately shutdown by her - be it via profusely denying their gimmick or immediately having them annihilated on the spot. This is extremely validhunty behaviour that, to my knowledge, is explained as her character being this way, which is absolutely unacceptable. I've had this described to me as "if they don't get the spotlight, they go nuts ICly" - which is very true, because this is exactly what has happened and keeps happening as long as this character keeps being allowed to be this way. Lin oftentimes takes completely unreasonable courses of action to shutdown antags. Prime example: b2-ce0j, where they almost went chasing an armed antag out of the bridge with a softsuit on, which didn't happen only because security pleaded her to. Later in the round, they armed themselves with a hazard hardsuit and every single weapon in the armoury except a shotgun with about three officers on-shift to focus on taking down the antag alone. This was all because the spotlight was not on her. This behaviour completely changes when they're made a hostage or the antag's gimmick revolves around them. A character that behaves this way, and is justified as this being a character trait, should not be allowed. I have been told that this is their character's behaviour. Delving more into their issues as a player, it can be very easily noticed how much their validhunting tendencies show themselves in the average round. Very often they'll use the excuse of "I'm implanted and therefore I would die for Nanotrasen" to shut down many antagonists - they use their role as head of security to use the armoury for themselves rather than actually coordinate the department. This is not what heads of staff should be about, and I refuse to believe that someone who chooses to behave this way should be allowed to hold, let alone GET, a head of staff whitelist. Did you attempt to adminhelp the issue at the time? If so, what was the known action taken by administration/moderation? It was not ahelped. This is the culmination of many rounds of complaints. Approximate Date/Time: Unapplicable. This complaint is about total character behaviour.

yes +1 he a good man and i don't think he'll clash with staff anymore.

TO: Muhawir Nawfal, Assistant, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 13-13:45-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2019 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Finley Greyson, Surgeon, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 13-10:39-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2019 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Miei Liau Moon, Medical Doctor, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 13-11:06-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2019 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Qaeio Tii'Aei, Security Officer, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 13-10:39-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS