Jump to content

Gem

Developers
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    201

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Gem

  1. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  2. Gem
    implemented. locking and archiving.
  3. Gem
    implemented. locking and archiving.
  4. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  5. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  6. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  7. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  8. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  9. Gem
    implemented. locking and archiving.
  10. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  11. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  12. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  13. Gem
    old/stale thread. locking and archiving.
  14. Gem
    i think it's fine as-is.
  15. Gem
    i disagree with this suggestion. while i like the concept of overmap antagonists, i don't think putting the raiders on the overmap is a good idea as this will remove focus from the ship whereas right now they are forced to go to the ship. locking raiders to the overmap also implies removing their choice of boarding stealthily, which is also a minus. (edit: unless turning off the IFF lets them be invisible.)
  16. Gem
    we used to have this, but it ended up with, for example, roboticists taking the biomechanical engineer role and refusing to repair or work on robots, and vice versa. if the foundation and their duties differ, it should be a different job. if the foundation is the same but the duties differ, it should be an alt title. machinists, whether they would be "specialized" in robots or biomechanics, both work with the same thing, thus there is no need for an alt-title imo.
  17. Gem
    this use case is pretty much already covered by code blue and code red. voting for dismissal.
  18. Gem
    locking and archiving as this suggestion has been dismissed.
  19. Gem
    i don't think unwhitelisted players should be able to play whitelisted roles, because it kind of defeats the purpose of whitelisting them in the first place. if this is the case for away sites (which i think it is?) it shouldn't be a thing anymore.
  20. Gem
    locking and archiving since the suggestion has been PR'd and implemented.
  21. Gem
    locking and archiving as this suggestion has been dismissed.
  22. Gem
    i second this. voting for dismissal.
  23. Gem
    locking and archiving since the suggestion has been PR'd and implemented.
  24. Gem

    Add Runespeak

    Gem replied to Butterrobber202's topic in Archive

    cult already has runespeak.
  25. Gem
    afaik staff wants factions in departments to be the whole department and not just singular roles.
×
×
  • Create New...