UnknownMurder

I would like to propose an idea in favor of giving merchant a bank account. As we know, the crew only has NT Bank Accounts. Perhaps we can give the merchant a personal account and allow the merchant to access the ATM with charging for using a NT ATM. So to speak, ATM usage fees are the fees that many banks and interbank networks charge for the use of their ATMS. In most cases, these fees are assessed solely for non-members of the bank; in other cases, they apply to all users. I am in favor of this suggestion as it gives both mechanically & RP advantages and disadvantages to merchants. [mention]ben10083[/mention][mention]Alberyk[/mention][mention]Synnono[/mention][mention]DatBerry[/mention] What do you think?

Pretty much the tl;dr.

Like an IT which is already in underwork?

100% in agreement. Whilst irrelevant contribution to the suggestion, this is a continuous behavior that needs to be stopped. Detectives do not work in the lab, Forensics Technicians do. Although, Forensics Technicians do need some tweaks as well as the ones listed. Although, "Medical Examiner" should already fall under Forensics Technician. Access to the morgue needs to be granted to FT as well.

To begin with, I am a man of RP. I will do anything to make the story interesting for both side, even if it puts me at a disadvantage. For this, I am hoping to provide Security a little improved roleplay considering the selection of two interrogation methods. Criminals loves to be interrogated by anyone, even if from a lousy cadet to a professional robuster Head of Security with amazing energy gun. Any attention given to the criminal will keep both parties satisfied to prolong deeper into the round Essentially, there will be little to medium effort in map change for this suggestion. I propose a suggestion to improve our RP for interrogation. The interrogator will have two method of interviewing. The first method is interrogate as normal, face to face with the interviewee with a universal recorder in front of the desk. Just as how as it always has been. The second method would have interrogating the interviewee behind the windows, masking his own identity leaving for the interviewee to figure out who the interrogator is. The interrogator will have three advantages to this. One as already stated, to figure out who the interrogator is. Two, the output of the communication will be broadcasted as unknown to the interviewee. Lastly, hopefully the windows will change to one sided window rather to use the cameras. The interrogator can perhaps make the RP more interesting by revealing who the interrogator actually is and try to pull more information from interviewee. The URL below is a summarized version of the second method except the numbers and interviewee going crazy. . Thoughts?

I'm very frustrated with Incompetent Security Department. They can never get the job done right. Can we have a change and overhaul in the security system while doubling Research Director's authority?

This does truly make sense. I should not have to swap back and forth to hear people and to see my body while my body is simply right there hearing people around me. +1

I believe someone had this argument a while ago. I do not recall where and why. I'm cool with this right now.

I have looked at the suggestion before I started to spare my time playing this game. I used to be in a support of this suggestion until I gave plentiful amount of time playing this, I am not in support of this suggestion. Cloning is essential and is part of space station 13 tradition, I could call people out for being a hypocrite for not agreeing with suggestion involving red shirt for assistants to be as a reference to Star Trek because space station 13 tradition. Unfortunately, you cannot use the excuse to cover up the cloning because people can respawn, it doesn't work like that; cloning has been with us for many years and so has the respawns. We're in 2459, everyone as been cloned before and is harder to retcon; we have the knowledge to change genetic codes, change DNA and RNA, etc. We (the skrells) have strong knowledge and capabilities to do many things. Knowledge is power. If you truly desire to "remove" a character from the round then you should put some thinking and your back into it, do some effort to finish the job. I can relate with you that it is not easy to "remove" the character completely from the round. However, players cannot "remove" players out of the round and ensures it stays that well (unless you bomb everything and resort to pissing people off). I guarantee you, the players who play on the server without looking at the forum will be utterly disappointed that cloning has been removed and will not try to give the server a chance to play with cloning. I will have to agree with [mention]Senpai Jackboot[/mention], people are dying much faster than you think; why hasn't this suggestion been dismissed yet? Removing cloning helps to kill roleplay. Like Rainbow Six: Siege or any other video game titles with one respawn per match, people will resort to using more tactical thinking for the duration of the round including trust issues. Variety of people already has enough OOC and IC trust issues counting myself as one of them. At the moment, I am interested in Arrow's project. Arrow's projects have never failed to surprise us. -1

Reporting Personnel: Drake Bond Rank of Reporting Personnel: Security Officer, Level Two Game ID: bQP-avX9 (EXTENDED ROUND Pretty amazing, huh?) Personnel Involved: - Opamator-3.0, Head of Security, Witness (Promanguy1223) - Albert Wolfe, Detective, Witness - Bjorn Karlsson, Security Officer, Offender - Kal Dietrich, Paramedic, Witness Time of Incident: 8:50 Real time: 10/7/2459 Location of Incident: Interrogation Room, Security Department Nature of Incident: []Workplace Hazard []Accident/Injury []Destruction of Property [X]Neglect of Duty [X]Harassment []Assault []Misconduct []Other _____ (Place an x in the box that applies. If other, replace line and specify.) Overview of the Incident: (General description of the incident, to include as much detail as is deemed necessary) To start with, "As a level two security officer, I have offered my assistance long before this interrogation. Detective Wolfe and I have been working together on the investigation regarding reported missing dead bodies. Detective Wolfe was thrilled when I've given him our lead suspect, Kal Dietrich , the impersonator impersonating as Parker McClymonds, a janitor who has died to being crushed by elevator in early shift. We took Kal Dietrich to the interrogation room and interrogate her, I've done little paperwork for Detective Wolfe to make his interrogation flow through easily. I believe that's all need to be said here following up to Officer Karlsson's interruption of the interrogation wherein I called for the Commander. The Commander has ordered Officer Karlsson to exit the interrogation while I was standing in interrogation, being an aide to Detective Wolfe. Detective Wolfe has exploded (metaphorically) and scolded Officer Karlsson for ruining the interrogation and leaving the culprit, Kal Dietrich in state of confused of what is occurring, one thing led to another and interrogation room was somewhat in chaos. Detective Wolfe pulled Officer Karlsson out and scolded him some more and told him to back off and never to come back, along these lines. Whilst I feel as Detective Wolfe needs his space, I decide to without a word leave the investigation team and patrol around on my own. I hoped this would be the end of it until Officer Karlsson decides to act as one of those high school jocks cliche, drag you to the security equipment locker room, he would then say to me in extreme hostilities, "Do we have a problem between us?". I knew it was the best not to answer this question and ignore Officer Karlsson until he decides to stalk and scream at you in the hallway in the public that he is trying to talk to me. I knew the situation was falling apart, I grabbed my PDA to contact the Commander that I am this close to arrest Officer Karlsson for battery (touching and trying to stop me from ignoring me) and hooliganism then I asked him for his audience. Commander shows up and finds out for himself that Officer Karlsson is indeed following me and screaming at my face. I receive a work call and pursuit a suspect reportedly possibly killing a security cadet, Jane Sarie. I lose the pursuit of the suspect, Head of Security pulls me and Officer Karlsson to the briefing room and we have a seat. I give my short side of the story to satisfy the Commander's question and expectations as Karlsson gives his side of the story. Captain asks me over Security channel if I am occupied at the moment, I do not say anything and look to the Commander. The Commander speaks over the Security channel that I am not occupied and dismisses me. I inform the Commander that I will be filling out a complaint form and send it toward to him to make decision. Unfortunately, that did not occur as I sat down with Internal Affairs Agent, Carter LaFontaine, an internal affairs investigation regarding a missing satchel. The crew transfer vessel was called and I decided on my own that I would fill out an incident report. I have considered checking neglect of duty for interrupting the detective's interrogation and harassment for stalking me around the public areas whilst screaming at me. Did you report it to a Head of Department or IAA? If so, who?: Head of Security, Opamator-3.0 Actions taken:Attempted to get us together in groups but is unable to due to a murder, Captain and IAA requested for my attention immediately. Head of Security has appeared to have done nothing. Additional notes: (OOC: I may be busy over the weekdays. Contact me immediately as I can try to fit interview in my schedule.)

I'm loving bold changes I see on this thread. I hope the changes is easier to accustom to on the server. Keep it up, folks!

I wish you a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

Feel free to remove this post because it may appear to be irrelevant to the current case and I may have no "say" in what happens next after my testimony. I was present during this case and I'll testify as an attacker along with juggernaut and Hashu. Xander was not "bumrushed"/powergamed. We had planned for this to happen. Although, you ghosted the moment you were sharded. You took IC issues to LOOC. The cultists were unhappy with the result and I do remember you were spoken to by Garn on both cases. However... On good faith, I believe that this should not be used against to shoot down Xander's reasoning in this staff complaint, and staff complaint should only be focused on Delta's behavior, not Xander's otherwise make a player complaint against Xander.

I'll riddle you with BULLETS.

First of all, if you believe that our story is incorrect, care to provide a story of your own of what really happened? Second, I have no objections to handing this issue to an administrator if this is alright with @[mention]Scheveningen[/mention], with an administrator, I believe we can get closer to the truth. Usually in the past, administrators handles reports involving both parties accusing each other of lying. Again, up to Scheveningen.

Coming from you, right!? That's right, I'm accusing you of lying in your response. What about those screenshots we have of you? Not a single thing. What are you hoping to see what you've done wrong? You're already guilty enough, you can just plea the fifth. Untrue. Character wasn't really annoying, however character was scolded about his actions on newscaster. We had a conversation about that. Head of Personnel was present in the conversation. Admins can review the conversation we had. (Admins, just search "2017" in your log detector, you'll find the appropriate conversation.) Let's not also forget that you also received a punishment by given a hard talking to. You were told to cease and desist with acting smugness over crisis reporter. You were given a yes or a no question that you understand to cease and desist, you said as I quote, "Sure". This implies strongly that you do not care about the conversation we just had. I kicked you out of the room and hoped to have never deal with you again. I saw you carry around the laser gun in your hand, you brought it to the Library and ran around the public hallway in which I slapped you with one "Failure to execute an order" on both basis. Don't lie to me. I know you were there clearly while we were dealing with an assistant crowbaring up the wooden floors and attacking crisis reporter. I've witnessed you putting the wooden floors back to the library floor. It's actually evidence, it shows how your reactive behavior is toward to this issue. Testimony counts as an evidence. Again, anything you say can be and will be held against you. My testimony to ClearThoughts. Sonic's testimony to ClearThoughts. They are evidence. What are you implying? He was pretending to be extremely malicious? He has two player complaints against you now because you did something to him that you could have just let it go. But no... No... You just had to create more troubles and we're here because of your troubles. The reporting party will see it to that player complaint be done with accordingly. This is funny to all of us, I intentionally saved the best for the last. Why? This shows us what you are thinking right now, "Hey! He's probably lying... Hm. I better fight fire with fire. That's right, I'll just lie in my response and see what happens. OH YEAH! That's a wonderful plan! I can't see anything wrong with it! I better tell him that all of ClearThought's gyazos are fake and none of them are from in-game. None of them." And you tell me that without screenshot or anything to back your claims that we're lying while ClearThoughts have already provided screenshots to support my claim to prove that you are the only whom are lying in your rebuttal. We have screenshots, you don't. [mention]DatBerry[/mention], security officer as in running around with laser gun in hand. Not on the armor or on the hand. In hand. Like this detailed example picture but with a laser gun in hand. I have no comments for your second point as it stands well against the reported player. There is a real issue here. I applaud you for participating in this complaint.

This'll be pleasurable for the community to watch this complaint, undeniably. I'd like to enlighten the reported player that everything you voice will and can be held against you in this case. Fill out an incident report against me, I double dog dare you. I have read (terms and conditions) the complaint. I am Vincent LeChiffre, the Captain for the round. Everything I have to say about what I've perceived as already been involved in this player complaint with these durable evidence. I do not need to say anything else. I would like to accentuate that Biabri's approach to ClearThought's calm ambassadorial and has been insolent and brushed him off in a unsystematic manner. There are zero excuses for behaving this way for the entireness of the round, this is excruciating. This is close to the line of what we would call, a shitcurity. This conduct toward to Joseph Ward should not duplicate itself as it correspondingly did in aforementioned player complaint.

I use Captain's office very often as a meeting room for few amount of people and urgent privacy. On the bright side, it generates huge amount of RP because you should feel VERY honored to be in Captain's office. Very few people gets to be in Captain's office and have a sit down talk with the Captain. +1

Morty. Morty, listen *burp* to me. What I am doing is goi *burp* super complicated. You follow me, Morty? I am going to extract this DNA and insert this DNA into where your doo doo goes. You follow me, Morty? Morty, *burp* you listening? MORTY! Aw geez, Rick. +1

Am I the only person who is thinking of energy guns with a firing pin with similarities to Psycho Pass's Dominator Gun? At the same time, it would be neat although it disadvantages more people. Am I the only person who is thinking of energy guns with a firing pin with similarities to Psycho Pass's Dominator Gun? Anime reference aside, I want to say that [mention]Senpai Jackboot[/mention]'s statement pretty much ends this discussion, the only people supporting this suggestion are merely grasping at straws. I can say for sure by stalking credible people on discord, they have been disappointed at the trending security validhunting people.

Say no more.

What if Senri's the spy? What if I'm the spy? Or you? We can go all day.

Jack Wood no longer works as NanoTrasen employee and if Jack Wood does return to work as NanoTrasen employee, notify Central Command Internal Affairs Agent effectively (or IncognitoJesus). This incident report may now be closed.