Scheveningen

make this de jure shitcoder a de facto shitcoder NOW but seriously they've done a significant amount of small changes which add up pretty well. i support this app wholeheartedly

hells yes please expand this to the unspeakably shitty looking walls too

More like power gaymers LMAOOO Nah I love this. Live free in the NT.

yes

stoip telling me to play plinketto w you

Suggest stuff that already exists that you want to see and want to use, and not stuff-that-isn't-there, as a reminder.

port techomancers now

Oh god this app has been up for too long I'm very supportive of this. SiG is very knowledgeable about Vaurca, and has been very helpful in the regard of answering questions about them - and would be a great writer for the species too.

Fully agreed. Only problem is having enough equipment for two, but with departmental security inching towards an evermore complete and foreseeably permanent state, the more I'd like to see this issue addressed.

yes. entirely yes. if "blobcurity bad" then actions need to be taken to ensure the amount of occasions where sec turns into a blob of baton-waving crayon munchers needs to be minimal.

1. Warrants cannot reasonably exist in a sequence of roleplay events without reasonable cause attached to them. Abusing the ability to write warrants for an arbitrary reason inevitably leads to a non-negotiable secban. Ergo, pointless clarification, as literally no one writes up warrants for no reason lest they desire to no longer play the security department. Warrants are supposed to and/or get written up as a result of something happening. 2. Interesting red herring, I'm not biting, however. Yes, it does matter where you socialize. There exist inappropriate places to socialize. Two officers who are responsible for two completely different departments that are chatting in a departmental security office, is a pretty big deal considering it pertains to one's dereliction of post whereas the other is tolerating their colleague's dereliction of post. Likewise, if an antag does something nearby, those two officers will most likely instantly respond. And a problem such as this is what departmental security was supposed to defeat from an OOC standpoint, was it not?

having a warrant. Two officers from completely different departments should not be having a social visit in a work office in another department. They should be having a social visit somewhere else in a place where relaxing is appropriate.

Spending a spell point for it is pretty silly, is the major issue.

What's considered a worse outcome in your mind, getting your hat pulled off as a wizard to disable you from casting most of your spells, or sec deciding to escalate to lethals if they see that they can't catch and contain you? Actually curious, not a rhetorical question. The containment bit seems to be centered around the fact jaunt exists as an "oh shit" button that doesn't have enough of a cooldown to justify its power. Escape methods should still exist in my mind, but jaunt's very powerful.

Gonna stab kyres with a foam sword

This is technically a massive buff, which is why I don't have a PR up for it yet and want to gauge feedback first. Justification for the suggestion: to prevent anyone from metagaming the wizard and pulling off their hat to prevent them from using their more powerful spells. It's kind of lame this mechanic exists anyway on an HRP server where you cannot know that magical clothing is somehow the source of a wizard's power. Said wizard would not tell you this anyway. Adverse effect is that wizards flinging off spells while in cuffs will get gunned down faster. Most wizard spells are extremely powerful, however. I'm sure most wizards would rather go down flinging spells like a mad(wo)man instead of being left to languish in a cell muzzled all shift.

based

Dept sec seems okay but warrants need to be more heavily enforced instead of the department sec officers giving skeleton key access to respective departments.

Sure, fair enough.

Ad hominem. You assume to know what my intent is behind this policy suggestion beyond that which was already posted. Recall for a moment you speak to human beings on a daily basis who probably appreciate it when they are not jerked around or aren't accused of conspiracy-theory tier woo. Maybe maintain that level of courtesy here, whether you can distinguish humanity over a screen or not. Survey answer fields in human research generally avoid potential non-answers and unrealistic hypotheticals wherever possible, so as to not render eventual data completely unusable. There is also quite a bit more to it than gathering information in regards to surveys. Unless you are referring merely to your own perception of what surveys are. In which case, sure. Interesting, except the two game modes in particular have specific themes as a result of their execution or features-as-present. The ambitious ideal of "can we poll the community if they want a rework or removal of X" needs to take a backseat to pragmatic foresight of "do we have anyone who wants to rework X", first. Polling for whether or not people want to keep and rework a game mode is rather pointless if no developer will step up to do it in the first place, whatever their reasons. The only thing you need to add to that list is "Don't add stupid nothingburger answers to surveys." That is in essence all that is being asked above anything else. Do you have to make this so difficult to level with you?

I kind of preferred when security was this blob of a conflicting interest to other departments. As I predicted, it seems like antagonists have an eyewitness plus an officer to worry about in every department instead of just the eyewitness alone. It's kind of difficult to do much when an officer in each department is accounting for who is who, and who is where, and who hasn't spoken up in awhile (being quiet = automatically suspicious). While this does theoretically open up opportunities for team antags to pick apart departments piece by piece and absorb people into a rabble a lot easier, individual antagonists have to worry about a gun in every department. Avoiding the blob of security was much easier, since sec has to navigate over and around themselves when they were grouped in the old version. "Got a warrant?" doesn't seem as powerful as a statement at the moment.

The preferred option seems more sensible, it would lower case scenario frequency where all nymphs of a gestalt die when said gestalt decides to emergency eject or when they've sustained enough damage to break apart.

Also >butterfly knives doing 15 Somebody hasn't learned of plasteel/diamond butterfly meta. J U S T