ben10083

Maint Drones can be pinged to go to a certain area via drone control console.

Well, ignoring all the needless grenade chatter, I agree with this idea. It is stupid that SAT and similar areas can be effectively locked down by a single person popping a squat on the ladder, with security being helpless (No, having to dig a tunnel to reach it is not a good compromise). It is honestly extremely annoying and I am honestly debating whether I should make a policy suggestion to have this behavior be explicitly power gaming, but now isn't the time for me to go into detail about it. If we add this, it will also enhance Z-level combat (Someone firing up a ladder in a standoff to prevent anyone from coming down) and will allow antags/sec more ways to catch their opponent off-guard +1

+1 to all of it Although please provide detail for the transport mech, will it require advanced materials? What tech level will their circuits be? How many can it fit? Also I recommend increasing the module limit for them to 3 or 4, 1-2 is just too little even if you specialize. Otherwise, this seems like a great service mech.

Imagine finally getting a avowal and working as a HoP for 3 months, only for a anti-synth captain or someone else revoking it because you forgot to carry the zero or some other small mistake. Avowls can be revoked as a punishment in IRs and other situations, and I feel this is sufficent. Giving the regular heads the power to ruin someone's character in one round for a mistake would be a horrible idea. Also I see no reason to make a avowal temporary, as I see no reason for people to give out temporary "Be A HoP pass".

TO: Hans Weber, Captain, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 19-08:59-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2460 SIGN: CCIAAMS

TO: Julius Parker, Chaplain, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 19-08:22-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-3460 SIGN: CCIAAMS

I like it, only thing I don't like is allowing 3-4 changlings to always spawn in changeling rounds, and I also feel that the min should at least decrease to 2.

The fact it ISNT included makes it excluded tho. He wants security to either have a smaller chance or no chance of being traitor. I agree with this idea for the smaller chance, I feel they should still have a small chance just in case there isn't enough traitors and/or dead hour. +1

"Can't kill what is already dead inside"

Thank you and sorry for that, I get busy in the winter

I understand what you are getting at, but if looc is being salty, you can ahelp and the admins can deal with it efficiently (or mute it globaly if it gets too bad). Why do you feel we should add selective looc instead of moderating it?

I don't like the idea of changing our style of sprites just so we "look like bay". I want us to be unique from other servers, yet having the same sprite style doesn't help things. -1

This will provide stimulating rp of people attempting to escape the sim, +1

Synthetics are the best waifus

@Elliot Might be best for in Directive 11 that number 3. be changed to "Recommended actions", aka something like "get to a secure location" or something. If you do "further steps to bet taken" That will just give antags a red carpet of what sec will do next, or the exception will be pulled. Either way I feel my replacement will be a better fit

I dont see how the standard uniform would "drive people away". Security needs to be easily identifiable so people know who to call on for protection. Plus this can be enforced or loosely enforced by the command staff. So its not like you are banned for adding some personal touches, just dont make them too big.

I agree with this idea, however I feel we should also encourage antags to not go terminator-mode and kill everyone once/if security is unavailable. I have seen many merc rounds where they rushed the station due to low to no security, and feel this can also ruin a round for many people depending on the gimic of the mercs. Onto security: I dislike the idea of a official militia, we should still have security, but to a less extent, any militas should be made by the players, not because that is your alt-role. SIDE NOTE: I will be VERY disapointed if people try to derail this and turn this thread into X complaining about Y for 3 pages. So don't.

Speaking of butts, although this is an interesting idea, I feel that this will end up having security be much more invasive in searches, and I am sure that no one wants the warden performing complimentary colonoscopies to people who are being searched. However I would like some clarification: What can be used to hide the objects What objects can be hidden How can they be revealed.

Thanks to me investing 15 points into necromancy, I roll a critical and revive this thread once more!

This needs to be in project subforum. Until someone moves it, I will ask a question, when you mean tell the truth, what do you mean? Will they mumble out that they are a traitor if they enter the Srom? Do you mean mumble out by whispering? Please clarify.

Now THAT sounds fantastic, I was talking with a moderator last night when they were asking how centcom would react to the announcements (We don't reply on malf). I was already interested in the round when the mod described it to me, and I regret that it was too late in the night for me to join. I know that I will be dming people asking for more detail about this round for awhile, as I wish to know more detail after the "Gorsh reveal"