Naturally, I'd agree. That some of these features suck dick and would be better off cordoned off by admin powers instead of being a part of actual gameplay.
However, the improve don't remove people are just a result of the vocal minority/silent majority.
Because in the end, we aren't like Bay or /tg/ where gameplay is everything : we're a little more HRP than other HRP servers, and our culture is that we usually don't need to mechanically enforce things - we just find a way around it (cryo-ing immediately after realising its cult/ling) or just RP it out, as usual.
So we've reached a status quo - where new, profound, game-changing updates are yelled at to be less offensive or something because the vocal minority will kick up a fuss (whereas the average player will just ignore it) (e.g. the tattoo trampstamp controversy, funny joke descriptions) like some kind of nanny state.
Honestly, we should trust and most of all, RESPECT our playerbase for being mature and being able to handle these kinds of things well.(although I agree, pregnant women should NOT be on station - that's an extreme, but a raunchy tattoo isn't going to cause any moral dilemmas)
Just give players the liberty to roleplay it out. This entire argument is just about what's best for the playerbase without even testing or asking about it like some overconcerned mother.