Jump to content

Coalf

Members
  • Posts

    1,060
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Coalf

  1. If I'm not wrong the companies that have made these vendors aren't actually NT itself but rather their respective name brands. Chipco etc. I mean it's a nice theory but I don't see where it would really fit in. Note: I am currently unable to kill you upon your request, I apologise for the inconvenience.
  2. Completely fine, feel free to re-apply when you're ready. Locking and Archiving.
  3. To elaborate, I've realized that what you've said might have seemed way too preachy to me due to the controversial argument from someone else it came with, thus I do apologise for the seemingly agressive assumption of you being a lazy weiner. Further having a solution ISN'T REQUIRED to bring up an issue we might not potentially see, we've been involved in this process for about a year and thus can miss critical stuff other people have easier view of. So for everyone reading this, pick up your bag and give feedback to us and to Geeves.
  4. So I obtained chatlogs from a certain half-public server, not officially affiliated with Aurora but with admins and moderators present. In there I had witnessed behaviour which I would call as "bad", simply said as this because I lack a better word. You've complained, quite vocally with a certain group of other players about the trial system in place for the selection of heads, the reason I'm a bit miffed at this is because I've never witnessed these complaints being raised anywhere in the public discord, the head of staff forums, the policy suggestion forums or as a private message to any member of the whitelist team. So it was quite the donkey punch. Now the main driving force behind CCIA is the abillity to make decisions and confront issues of others. How do you plan to do that when you'd rather take an issue you have and privately complain about it rather then using the NUMEROUS devices we have to solve it, or even trying to communicate with the team responsible when you plan to work with them in the future?
  5. OP cannot post and told me to lock. So locking and archiving.
  6. Alright, locking and archiving sorry for the pings to everyone.
  7. Roger roger, locking and archiving.
  8. [mention]Senpai Jackboot[/mention][mention]Zundy[/mention][mention]Snake2512[/mention][mention]Pegasus[/mention] rise from your grave thread, this still need a yes or no and possibly even more talking.
  9. [mention]Zundy[/mention] need a yes or no on this el capitao.
  10. Zero responses since conception and multiple people in this thread are either not active or resigned from their post, thus I'll put this under denied and archive. Locking and archiving.
  11. Zero activity from OP since the last question, putting under denied. Locking and archiving.
  12. [mention]Scheveningen[/mention][mention]Zundy[/mention] please elaborate if this thread is to be continued, mi amores.
  13. [mention]Jakers457[/mention][mention]Senpai Jackboot[/mention] this thread is a tale as old as time, would be nice to come to a resolution.
  14. Accepted, locking and archiving.
  15. Denied, locking and archiving.
  16. This has been here since March, [mention]Resilynn[/mention][mention]Senpai Jackboot[/mention]. Can I just archive this or is there any further elaboration from either side?
  17. No activity since Feb 16th, locking and archiving.
  18. Since Skull said we won't add more languages until seriously required, this can be put under denied. Locking and archiving.
  19. Neither Muncorn nor Loow are on the team anymore, I'll put this under processed. Locking and archiving.
  20. You are unbanned, locking and archiving.
×
×
  • Create New...