Coalf

Overspecification is a real issue and the chaplain is already over-westernized. Having pretty much everything resemble the Christian style of worshipp rather than trying for any kind of variety. I couldn't support a crucifix unless the new update covers all the major religions.

Thank you very much.

If I remember correctly there were about 4 yes answers. Did arrow give you the specific selection and could it be posted here so we can see what people wanted.

That's not the issue. You can kill someone within a minute of statuing them if you like, you just break the statue. The problem is that it's not fun for you to be stuck like that for so long, unable to do anything. It should be a disable spell, not a 'write you out of the round' spell You misunderstood. I meant you can ESSENTIALLY kill someone with it. What I meant to imply that you can very easily keep someone frozen for the entire duration of the round with an upgraded Flesh to Stone.

Maybe instead of applying disarm. How about instead we use the "Pull Punches" verb to specifically give the chokehold a non-lethal method.

It's called Flesh to Stone. And I believe it lasts 3 minute un-upgraded(not sure measured this a long time ago) but upgrades can stretch it to what I measured was 6 minutes. The main issue is that during those 6 minutes the spell recovers again, meaning you can essentially kill someone with it.

After watching the resolution of your complaint. The whitelist team has decided to deny this application as of now. We recommend you apply again after your ban has expired.

Trial period is starting effective now, people are free to comment on this app until it's judged fully on the 4th of October.

I give you a better solution. Put the printing computer outside of the librarians office or make the "search" computers be able to print books for a

Or, maybe the outcome controllable, temporary and with a drastically longer cooldown. That way it becomes a very effective control tool similar to flesh to stone or wizard cuffs.

Application accepted, starting Trial period of one week from now.

Fully, thank you.

Just a heads up we haven't forgoten about you. However the recent complaint that has cropped up will postpone your eventual acceptance or denial and will have impact on our decision. Thus we would encourage you to work on debunking that and then proceed with your heads of staff application so you don't end up swarmed. Thank you for understanding.

I've had good interactions with your Doxx, some very fun interactions. I've seen you in other jobs than civilian showing you aren't afraid to step out of your box and experience new things. Always important, always important. One issue, might be minor, might be great. This phrase: "She is the type to demand respect, present herself at her best, and be a definite narcissist. Despite her demanding attitude, she quietly cares for her workers" The "her workers" is the phrase I want specified. Mainly due to the fact that in recent moths the issue of people being shit at communicating has gotten so bad that during an event we've had a 4 way complaint which escalated into two whitelists being removed and a stern warning. Thus I would like to specific what exactly "her workers" mean as departmental elitism and favoritism only ultimately harm the game. Otherwise good application, so far has my support.

So I wanted to look at you closer and give feedback, read feedback etc. Now there isn't much feedback here, so I elected to ask around in whitelist chat. Sadly with the summer vacation ending nobody has had much time and I haven't gotten much back about your playstyle. So I decided to just be simply technical and check the WI. The output the WI gave me are two rounds as Liemz and about 5 rounds as assistants (and chef) after your whitelist was removed. One of the main concerns during the incident was that there was an issue with character consistency and breaking character. In order to perpetuates ones ideas, gimmicks or round plans. The very, very low amount of actual feedback, besides +1's, reinforces this idea that nobody has really met you or know any of your characters enough to give constructive feedback. We don't rely on player feedback only of course, but you have promised to play Jawdat in his non-command form which I believe is detective looking at the round history. Playing Jawdat in his non-command job for at least a week or two would honestly be 100% satisfactory. Mainly due to the fact that such a job is very RP centric and noticable making it easy to garner proper feedback. But besides the amount of playtime, I have no issue with the rest of the application. I like the importance you put on player engagement and which you tone down by saying "within reason" (although sometimes reasonable is debatable). Lore is on point but that is expected really. Yeah, increase in playtime and there'll be no issue really.

Note, while I did provide the logs I am not taking over the complaint. I just happened to be online and on server when DasFox was around. Further all OOC/LOOC/AHELPS were censored along with all Ckeys not relevant to this complaint. DasFox did not receive the entire server log.

Denying and Archiving on the request of the original author.

Archiving due to lack of replies.

Archiving.

Resolved, locking and archiving.

Closing and archiving.

Why add it then. Whoops pushed button too soon. I meant with that statement you kinda confirmed it's not actually doing anything? I mean if it debiliated faster it would make some difference? But this just means I'll buy a snack from the vendor and get a glass of water aswell. Which makes making food vendor snacks saltier no-debuff at all. So really I mean why? Just add the hunger mechanics that seems fine enough.

So I read the code nice nice, hunger rework okay make it more important sure sure. But why thirst? Because you forgot a major concern, sinks. Sinks are effectively everywhere, they provide water in unlimited amounts with the only disadvantage being you need a drink container. Something easily bought from a vendor. So what does it do really? At most, as I mentioned in my previous question, it'll make everyone bring a glass of water with them in the pocket for CQH (Close Quarters Hydratation). I mean aurora isn't really a survival horror game so resource management won't add anything to it. There is no resources to fight for if they're infinite. Sure you could make sinks finite but the amount of water present in a water dispenser would honestly most likely last the entire crew for the entire 2 hours. If anything there'll be an annoying 3 minute break in the middle of RP for me to run to a sink, get a sip of water and run back to sit down. Immersion could be made the case, yes, but so could adding a blink or breathe command. This seems to only affect IPC's really, with the fact there is only one lube dispenser? Addendum: Oh and miners, while I'm happy mining stopped being "smack rocks until you get enough points for the AoE upgrade and job finished", making them take a break every 10-20 minutes to go on station, drink something and go back out into space. Well that just seems fist-clenching annoying.

Are salty foods and salt in general going to make characters more dehydrated?

Hello. We've taken some time to review logs and discuss this along with Tailson and Aboshehab and came to this conclusion. Record keeping of this detailed can be called into questions by other individuals, however it is not against the rules unless it's used to infringe on the anonymity of the player, revealing information they do not wish to be revealed or outright stalking them, none of this has been done by Judge. It is perfectly okay to show off these logs if you feel like they would help an investigation. To the appropriate staff. Showing off or talking about the fact you hold logs to the people you plan on eventually using them against is intimidation. To define intimidation: "to compel or deter by or as if by threats". Intimidation is included within the "Don't be a dick" rule. Thus the resolution is as follows: [mention]JKJudgeX[/mention], stop showing or talking about this document in public. We aren't forbidding you from showing it to a staff member who is currently investigating an issue and you feel like your logs could help. PRIVATELY. If people want to go and laugh at you, deconstruct your arguments or in general dangle this above your head in the aurora discord, contact staff since that is also included in the "Don't be a dick rule." We however can't ban total discussion of previous issues, keep that in mind. Most points in this thread have been exaggarated and we discourage that in the future when making a report in order to remain objective. We don't believe [mention]ParadoxSpace[/mention] or anyone else in the chat stepped out of line with their agressivity, however it would be welcome if people stopped using "banter" as an excuse to be abrassive and disrespectful to each other. You don't win arguments by making fun of the other side. If you want to have an argument, respect each other. This complaint will be closed in 24 hours if no other issues arise.